2.76 Justification

Category: Epistemology

Keywords: believing, beliefs, epistemically, belief, justification, reliable, justified, reliability, epistemic, goldman, forming, believe, believed, accepting, warrant

Number of Articles: 515
Percentage of Total: 1.6%
Rank: 11th

Weighted Number of Articles: 468.9
Percentage of Total: 1.5%
Rank: 14th

Mean Publication Year: 1991.3
Weighted Mean Publication Year: 1987.2
Median Publication Year: 1994
Modal Publication Year: 1996

Topic with Most Overlap: Knowledge (0.0603)
Topic this Overlaps Most With: Knowledge (0.0734)
Topic with Least Overlap: Beauty (0.00046)
Topic this Overlaps Least With: Classical Space and Time (0.00091)

Justification

Figure 2.170: Justification

Justification Articles in Each Journal

Figure 2.171: Justification Articles in Each Journal

Comments

The model separates out the theory of Knowledge from the theory of Justification, but they end up with the very same graph. And it’s not like the division is particularly clean; some of the main papers from the Analysis of Knowledge debate end up here.

This topic has even fewer papers from the early years that are clearly in the topic. The first paper that gets a topic probability above one-third is by Harry Frankfurt! This tells us something interesting about the background to Gettier’s 1963 paper. Just a few years before that paper, there was virtually no discussion of beliefs being justified. It wasn’t that Gettier showed that a familiar concept couldn’t play a role in the analysis of knowledge. He effectively introduced the concept of justification.

Another way to think about the division the model is making here is that the earlier topic is Knowledge-first epistemology, this is Belief-first epistemology, and the upcoming topic on Formal Epistemology is credence-first epistemology. The model thinks ‘justified’ and ‘justification’ are, respectively, \(10^5\) and \(10^8\) times more likely to appear in this topic than in Knowledge. But it also thinks ‘believe’, ‘believing’, ‘beliefs’ and ‘believed’ are, respectively, \(10^3\), \(10^5\), \(10^{14}\) and \(10^{15}\) times more likely to be here. On the other hand, it thinks ‘know’ and ‘knows’ are \(10^6\) and \(10^{14}\) times less likely to be here than in Knowledge, while ‘skeptic’ and ‘williamson’ are also \(10^{14}\) and \(10^{20}\) times less likely. Obviously a lot of these words are used in a lot of the articles you seee above, which is why the model has ambivalent verdicts about the papers. But that’s the distinction it is drawing.

With that in mind, the trends over the last few years of the three main epistemology topics are interesting.

Trends in Epistemology in the Last 25 years of the study

Figure 2.172: Trends in Epistemology in the Last 25 years of the study

Justification was for a while the biggest of the three topics. But while it didn’t fall, it also hasn’t shared in the rapid rise of Knowledge or, especially, Formal Epistemology. The dip in Knowledge in the last few years looks to me like a blip, but that will be interesting to check back on in a little while.