6.35 Epistemic Modals

Keywords: zif, supposition, semantics, raining, modal, supposed, stalnaker, compatible, semantic, possibilities, statements, acts, clause, utterance, evaluation

Number of articles: 23
Weighted number of articles: 21.47218

Figure 6.145: Raw number of articles in topic 35, epistemic modals.

Figure 6.146: Weighted number of articles in topic 35, epistemic modals.

Figure 6.147: Percentage of philosophy articles in topic 35, epistemic modals.

Figure 6.148: Percentage of epistemology articles in topic 35, epistemic modals.

Characteristic Articles

1. Anthony S. Gillies, 2004, “Epistemic Conditionals and Conditional Epistemics,” Noûs 38:585–616.
2. K. Derose, 1998, “Simple ’Might’s, Indicative Possibilities and the Open Future,” The Philosophical Quarterly 48:67–82.
3. Cian Dorr and John Hawthorne, 2013, “Embedding Epistemic Modals,” Mind 122:867–913.
4. Benjamin Schnieder, 2010, “Expressivism Concerning Epistemic Modals,” The Philosophical Quarterly 60:601–15.
5. Roy Sorensen, 2009, “Meta-Agnosticism: Higher Order Epistemic Possibility,” Mind 118:777–84.
6. David Barnett, 2010, “zif Would Have Been If: A Suppositional View of Counterfactuals,” Noûs 44:269–304.
7. David Barnett, 2006, “Zif is if,” Mind 115:519–65.
8. David Barnett, 2009, “Yalcin on ‘Might’,” Mind 118:771–5.
9. Seth Yalcin, 2007, “Epistemic Modals,” Mind 116:983–1026.
10. Seth Yalcin, 2009, “More on Epistemic Modals,” Mind 118:785–93.

Highly Cited Articles

1. Seth Yalcin, 2007, “Epistemic Modals,” Mind 116:983–1026. (0.9925313)
2. Kai Von Fintel and Anthony S. Gillies, 2008, “Cia Leaks,” Philosophical Review 117:77–98. (0.4499682)
3. Johan Van Benthem, 2004, “What One May Come to Know,” Analysis 64:95–105. (0.2983386)