Bach's schematic, as it appears on the page, © Bradley Lehman, 2005-14, all rights reserved.
All musical/historical analysis here on the web site is the personal opinion of the author,
as a researcher of historical temperaments and a performer of Bach's music.

Outlines of academic articles

Outline of "Bach's extraordinary temperament: Our Rosetta Stone"

My main scholarly article about this discovery is published in the February and May 2005 issues of Early Music. That article describes the historical context and provides musical and mathematical analysis.

All of these sections are integral parts of my musicological argument, with some interdependencies across the seven portions: two in print and five as "supplementary" PDF files on Oxford's web site. Download these seven PDF files free from the links here marked with ***.

In Oxford's copy-edited version for publication, my manuscript was reorganized into two main halves for print, and they eliminated three sections (marked A, B, C here). The remaining sections of closer musical analysis, plus the detailed mathematical comparisons among temperaments, became "supplemental" web-only files to save space in the printed journal.

  • Printed portion of Part 1, February 2005 [Read PDF file] *** (Links updated here 3/28/18 to local addresses, because Oxford's service of free courtesy links has been broken for more than a year.)
    • Introduction (originally preceded by four epigrams - A)
    • Background: the commas and other problems to be solved
    • Bach's diagram
    • Translation of the diagram: the practical recipe
    • Mathematical modelling of the same: scientific reproducibility
    • Why hasn't this been found before? (originally included the discovery section also - B)
    • Origins and destinations
    • Ensemble music (vocal music clarified further here later in 2005)
    • Acknowledgments and footnotes
  • Web portion of Part 1, February 2005 [Download/Read "Supplementary Data" four PDF files] ***
    • Illustration: the complete WTC autograph title page
    • Comparing the qualities of major 3rds (see also errata on several Neidhardt temperaments -- download the corrected version here)
    • Appendix: Comparison of Bach's method with other temperaments. Two summary charts, explanation of the included temperaments, and 44 full-page analyses of these competing layouts. (Later errata in the Neidhardt temperaments)
  • Printed portion of Part 2, May 2005 [Read PDF file] ***
    • Melodic and harmonic characteristics: overview
    • Playability of Bach's keyboard repertory (expanded and clarified here later in 2005)
    • Three different 'equal' temperaments joined into one
    • Enharmonics (originally included the cube model also - C)
    • Recognizable scales through the distinct intonation of their steps
    • Major 3rds, minor 3rds, and mean accidentals
    • Musical illustrations of Bach's temperament in WTC
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
  • Web portion of Part 2, May 2005 [Download/Read "Case Study Supplement" PDF file] ***
    • Case study: O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde gross, BWV 622
    • Case study: Kleines harmonisches Labyrinth, BWV 591
    • Case study: Clavierübung III
    • Further observations about the Four Duetti
    • Duetto 1, E minor
    • Duetto 2, F major
    • Duetto 3, G major
    • Duetto 4, A minor
    • Appendix: A quick and practical tuning method, by ear
    • Footnotes
  • Six listening examples belong with that complete multi-part article, and those are hosted at Oxford's web site as [Music Clips (the link is sometimes broken)] *** (registration required, free). [Download 32MB ZIP file]

    They are all in MP3 format. Their details:

    • Track 1 (organ) - Kleine harmonisches Labyrinth, BWV 591, C major - as analyzed in the Case Study noted above
    • Track 3 (harpsichord) - Modulation Canon of the Musical Offering, BWV 1079 - as mentioned in part 1 of the article, page 17
    • Track 7 (harpsichord) - F minor fugue from WTC book 1, BWV 857 - use of many flats, and a chromatic subject
    • Track 10 (harpsichord) - F# minor fugue from WTC book 1, BWV 859 - use of many sharps
    • Track 23 (organ) - O Mensch, bewein dein Sünde gross, BWV 622, Eb major - as analyzed in the Case Study noted above
    • Track 24 (organ) - Kyrie, Gott heiliger Geist, BWV 671, g Phrygian - whose last page is especially problematic in other unequal temperaments
  • Listen also to the performance of Bach's G minor Sinfonia as performed by Robert Hill on 6 May 2004, Swiss radio. This recording is cited in endnote 4 of part 1 of the article. It was the first public performance using this temperament.

In addition to reading and listening, it is especially important to go through the hands-on musical practice playing examples at a harpsichord (as detailed in the printed part 2 plus its web portion), to hear the evidence presented most directly.

That is something to do by ear for best understanding (because Bach would have had to do so, without electronic aid). The process is to work as a tuner/performer reproducing Bach's responsibilities, where I believe he drew compositional/theoretical ideas from the sound, listening directly through a suitable instrument.

The serial presentation in the journal, across two issues of print, has had some advantages and disadvantages. The chief advantages are the longer exposure to generate readers' interest about the material, and the ability to preserve most of the manuscript into publication (eventually!) without cutting it more drastically.

Another advantage is that this is the lead article in the Early Music issue that Oxford University Press gives away as a free sample, to web visitors who register at the main Oxford Journals or Early Music entry points! [All of the article is available for free, from the courtesy links right here on this "Outlines" page...but readers have to know to come here looking for any portions they've missed. That is not absolutely clear by reading merely part 1, either in print or on the web.]

The chief disadvantage is: some readers have obviously not bothered to read part 2 at all, or the web portions, before formulating their disagreements with either presentation or content.

Also, some readers misunderstand the necessity of reading the web "supplements" as a vital part of the article, and the necessity of listening to music tuned this way to grasp the musical points! Such readers have already broadcast their reactions and argumentation against the article, before all the material was available to them as a unified piece...and this has led to some serious public misunderstandings about this article's scope and completeness.

Most of the readers' correspondence (as published in the August issue of Early Music, and a few follow-ups) had already come in to the author and editor as objections, before part 2 was even in print yet: reflecting preconceptions based mainly on part 1. There have also been several books and articles by other people, published 2006 and 2007 (so far), that cite and argue with only part 1 in isolation...bringing up issues or objections that I had already addressed myself in part 2 (May 2005)!

Similarly, much of the internet chatter about this article (some of it uncharitable and seeming outright vicious, as a rumor-mill) has been an airing of people's personal dissatisfactions with their own expectations of part 1 in isolation, before May 2005. To me, this seems akin to walking out of a concert in the first 15 minutes and then presuming to "review" the entire concert by guesswork.

I most appreciate the comments of readers who have read all the portions and who have tested the musical points directly at a harpsichord, as specified in part 2. That is, it is important to engage all the material directly, before trying to formulate cogent agreements or disagreements with it! It's nice that a reading of part 1 (or the wandering-in from web searches, finding the web site) sparks people's enthusiasm to respond at all,'s also nice when readers take the trouble to study all the freely available resources, to see what's already been addressed.

The FAQ pages can also help with this problem. But, they are not substitutes or shortcuts for reading the whole article, either....

[Download all seven sections as PDF files] [Download the 32MB ZIP file of listening examples]

Outline of "The 'Bach Temperament' and the Clavichord"

This shorter article is published in the November 2005 issue of Clavichord International.
  • Introduction
  • Temperament recipe, including Bach's diagram
  • Its musical features of flexibility and hard/soft sounds in the various keys
  • Harmonic relationships
  • Clavichord specifics, and conversion of a fretted layout
  • Observations about the practical viability of any retuning
  • Examples against retuning: from BWV 772-801, 802, 808, 849, 887, 988, 1079, and 1080
  • Scale structure, with a graph
  • Conclusions
  • Practical by-ear instructions for clavichord or harpsichord
  • Footnotes
The complete text is now available as well, as of October 2006.

Return... Bach's schematic, rotated for use