I enjoy learning things. I like taking classes. I have been going to
the University of Michigan since I was
in 10th grade. My high school only had Latin and two years of French as
foreign languages. It was a small school; only 325 students. If you wanted
to take a class they didn't offer, you could take classes at UM or at the
other high schools. Since I didn't care to go to the other high schools,
I began taking university classes. My first class was a European history
class. Then, I took French and Italian classes before I graduated from high
school. I got into UM and have been going ever since. After the first few
semesters I figured out that I couldn't do full-time because I didn't put
enough into each class; or maybe I put in too much, and couldn't last out
the semester. At any rate, I began going part-time, only taking two or three
classes each semester, and although it takes a long time, it's much more
fun. I have taken Old English, Symbolic logic, Cultural Anthropology, Japanese,
Film Studies, Calculus, a lot of Linguistics
and English-language classes, Astronomy, "Math for Poets", and
many other interesting things. This semester, I am taking a class called
"Primate Social Behavior." It is really
fascinating so far- even the readings!!
I take classes that look interesting at the time, and don't pay any attention to what I need to graduate, or to how many science classes I have. Now I am nearing the time when I could graduate, and it looks like my idea of a rounded education meshes pretty well with the University's.
I have studied quite a few languages throughout my career; French, German, Welsh, Italian, Latin, Old English, and finally Japanese. I have come to one conclusion- although of course native speakers make the best teachers for pronunciation and intonation and natural feel, I don't think that anyone ought to be allowed to teach a language without having Linguistic training. When a student asks why something is the way it is, a foreign language teacher shouldn't be allowed to say, "That's just the way it is in our language. There's no pattern. You just have to memorize it this way," When 90% of the time, there *is* a pattern, or a reason, or there used to be a pattern which you can kind of see even though the modern forms have mutated. "Just memorize it this way" is completely contrary to the notion of education.
Back to Home of Phyl