Video Methods Analysis App
T. Armstrong

Turkey Boning: Use of surface EMG to determine force patterns and Application of the ACGIH TLV® for Localized Fatigue

Adapted from: Armstrong, T, Foulke J, Joseph B, & Goldstein S (1982). Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J, 43(2), 103-116.

Job description:

       
Fig 1: Thigh boning workstation (left); boning knife. (Right)

Use of EMG to study worker hand force patterns (see Figure 2)

       
Fig 2: Equipment used to record surface EMG from forearms as workers boning turkey thighs (Left)); The relationship between EMGRMS was determined for each subject and work posture in advance of each test(Right). (Right). Armstrong T, Chaffin D, Foulke J (1979) A methodology for documenting hand positions and forces during manual work. J Biomechanics Vol 12 pp. 131-133.

Hand Force Profiles

       

30-39 female grip strength: 340.3±69.6N
Mathiowetz V, et al. 1985

Fig 3a: Force profile based on Surface EMG recording from right forearm while boning two thighs (left); hand strength based on power grip data from Matiowetz et al.(1985). (Right)
   
(a)
   

Lateral pinch 30-39 female: 78.5±12.7N
Mathiowetz V, et al. 1985

(b)

Fig 3b: Force profile based on Surface EMG recording from left forearm while boning two thighs (a); hand strength based on lateral pinch data from Matiowetz et al.(1985). (b) hand force data

Applying the ACGIH TLV® for localized fatigue


(a)

(b)
Fig 4: The observed %MVC and DC exceed the the ACGIH TLV® for localized fatigue both the right and left hands. For the left hand, either the DC must be reduced to 6%% or the %MVCAvg must be reduced to 17% to not exceed ACGIH® recommenced limits (a). For the right hand, either the DC must be reduced to 48% or the %MVCAvg must be reduced to 13% to not exceed ACGIH® recommenced limits (b).

Possible job improvements

Fig 5: Modified knife (prototype) reduces force to hold & use knife