Next: VCF0903 Is House Incumbent
Up: anes_cdf_var
Previous: VCF0901b State Postal Abbrev
QUESTION:
---------
Type of House race
VALID_CODES:
------------
12. Democratic incumbent running--Republican challenger
13. Democratic incumbent--other challenger
14. Democratic incumbent running--unopposed
19. Democratic incumbent running--Republican challenger
and others
21. Republican incumbent running--Democratic challenger
23. Republican incumbent--other challenger
24. Republican incumbent running--unopposed
29. Republican incumbent running--Democratic challenger
and others
31. Other incumbent running--Democratic challenger
32. Other incumbent running--Republican challenger
34. Other incumbent running--unopposed
35. Other incumbent running--Democratic and Republican
challengers
36. Other incumbent running--Republican and other
challengers
37. Other incumbent running--Democratic and other
challengers
39. Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican,
other challengers
40. Democratic and Republican incumbents running--no
other candidate (1982 only: see note above)
45. Two Republican incumbents running (1992 only: see
note above)
49. Democratic and Republican incumbents running--other
candidate (1982 only: see note above)
51. No incumbent Repr. running--Democratic candidate
unopposed
52. No incumbent Repr. running--Republican candidate
unopposed
53. No incumbent Repr. running--other candidate unopposed
55. No incumbent Repr. running--Democratic and Republican
candidates
56. No incumbent Repr. running--Republican and other
candidates
57. No incumbent Repr. running--Democratic and other
candidates
59. No incumbent Repr. running--Democratic and Republican
and other candidates
83. No identifiable incumbent, Democratic candidate in
open race due to redistricting
84. No identifiable incumbent, Republican candidate in
open race due to redistricting
85. No identifiable incumbent, Democratic and Republican
candidates in open race due to redistricting
89. No identifiable incumbent, Democratic, Republican
and other candidates in open race due to
redistricting
MISSING_CODES:
--------------
99. NA
00. Washington D.C.; California (1974 only, due to
redistricting type of race could not be determined);
wrong district identified (2000); no post IW
Inap. question not used
NOTES:
------
GENERAL NOTE:
This variable is available for 1970, 1974 and 1976 as well as 1978 and
later. See warning note below. In some years this variable is not
available for no-post cases.
NES samples are not designed to be representative at the Congressional
district level. Samples include cases from only some U.S.
Congressional districts; for most congressional districts in which
interviewing actually takes place, only a small number of interviews
are taken.
Codes 40 and 49 apply as a result of redistricting: for other
Cumulative Data File variables referent to "the incumbent" and "the
challenger" the incumbent who represented R's sampling location BEFORE
redistricting has been considered R's 'incumbent' and the other
candidate (incumbent previously not representing R's sample location)
has been considered the 'challenger'; if two incumbents ran against
each other due to redistricting but neither had previously represented
R's location, neither candidate has been treated as an 'incumbent'.
1970,1974,1976 WARNING NOTE:
In 1970, 1974 and 1976, no type of race var was present in the original
NES datasets. Data for these years have been added to VCF0902 by
implementing a case-by-case determination of type of race for every R's
congressional district through consultation of reference materials.
The resultant data in VCF0902 for these years have been checked
somewhat, but perfect accuracy cannot be guaranteed due to the nature
of attempting case-by-case coding. The type of race established in
VCF0902 (and data in VCF0904-905 by derivation) for 1970, 1974 and 1976
should be used with caution and at the user's risk.
1978 NOTE:
1978 data in this variable do not exactly match the 1978 Study data:
several congressional districts in 1978 were not accurately coded for
for type of House race. MS03 was coded as 14 in the original 1978 data
but should have been coded 12 (24 cases); NY19 was coded as 12 in the
original 1978 data but should have been coded 14 (9 cases); NY38 was
coded as 21 but should have been coded 24 (14 cases). In VCF0902 these
cases have been corrected. However, note that in other Cumulative Data
File 900s-series congressional vars except for VCF0904, VCF0905 and
VCF1004-1014, candidate-level data continue to accord with the
original 1978 study designated type of race for MS03, NY19 and NY38.
1984 NOTE:
1 case in TX22 and 1 case in WA01 were mistakenly coded 65 in the
Study dataset and have been corrected to 55 here. Also, 1 case in WI05
was mistakenly coded 13 and has been corrected to 14 here. 1 case in
OH08 and 1 case in WI09 were mistakenly coded 12 and have been
corrected to 21 here. Finally, 4 cases in CA38 were incorrectly coded
(1 as 13, 3 as 21) and have been corrected to 12 here. These changes
have been reflected in VCF1004 and VCF1005.
1992 NOTE 1:
For panel cases, this provides the type of race for the 1992
congressional district of R's original address (1990) rather than the
address to which R may have moved by the time of the 1992 interview(s).
1992 NOTE 2:
Late in 1994, it was discovered that in 50 cases an incorrect CD number
had been assigned. These errors affect all questions related to House
race which were administered according to assigned-CD candidate names.
In the introduction to this codebook is a listing of case IDs with
correct districts, however no data have been changed in this file as a
result. Users can delete these cases from affected vars if desired.
1994 NOTE:
Codes represent type of race in district of interview location for the
current Study year.
1996 NOTE 1:
same as 1994.
1996 NOTE 2:
14 Pre interviews were conducted before the status of the congressional
race in R's district assumed its final form. These cases are flagged
in 1996 Study variable V960127, and the race type projected at the time
the Pre interview was administered is documented in 1996 Study variable
V960128. (In such cases Pre survey data are consistent with V960128.)
1998 NOTE:
2 districts had the incorrect type of race identified, and the 1998
instrument was administered according to the incorrect type of House
race. Cumulative Data File variables utilize 1998 data which have not
had corrections made: In 1998, cases in AL07 should have been type
race 14 (instead of 24); cases in CA41 should have been type race 55
(instead of 12).
2000 NOTE:
3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ.
These cases are coded 00.
2002 NOTE:
Code 55 includes 2 cases from LA05 where a Democratic and 2 Republican
candidates were running.
2004 NOTE:
The extent of the Texas redistricting prior to the 2004 election
produced House races with incumbents running in areas where he or
she had provided little or no prior representation, thus no Texas
candidate has been identified as a true incumbent (running or
retiring) for the new Texas districts (House type race 44-49).
WEIGHT:
-------
VCF0009/VCF0009a
TYPE:
-----
Numeric Dec 0
SOURCE_VARS:
------------
1978: 780004
1980: 800740
1982: 820006
1984: 840059
1986: 860043
1988: 880050
1990: 900058
1992: 923021
1994: 940017
1996: 960097
1998: 980065
2000: 000194
2002: 024500a
2004: 044502
Walter Mebane
2005-11-03