![]() |
Urban Planning 538: Economic Development Planning Winter 2012 Assignments last updated Sunday, April 29, 2012 1:10 PM |
Prof.
Scott Campbell (home page) |
Students are expected
to complete all the required readings before the scheduled class time, actively
participate in class discussions and presentations, and prepare several written
assignments over the semester. Evaluation of your work will be based
on substantive content, analytical rigor, and writing quality. Be sure
to follow appropriate citation guidelines in
all your work. Late assignments will result in point reductions. There
are two main assignments. The first is to write several short essays on specific
economic development topics (that the class will assemble together to form
a web-based local economic development reference handbook). The second is
to complete a take-home exam (consisting of a 6-7 page essay).
| Assignments and deadlines (for details, see below) -- REVISED | Date due | Percent of Grade |
| Handbook Entry 1 | Draft: Feb 21; Final April 25 (12:00 noon) | 32.5% |
| Handbook Entry 2 | Draft: April 3; Final April 25 (12:00 noon) | 32.5% |
| Glossary Entries (2 per student) 2.5% each * 2 = 5% | Draft: April 3; Final April 25 (12:00 noon) | 5% |
| Take-home Final Exam (questions handed out April 12) page length: 6-7 pages. | April 23 (12:00 noon) | 25% |
| Class Participation | 5% |
Update: to accomodate points for the 2 glossary entries, I have slightly adjusted the above: each handbook entry (32.5%, down from 35%); each glossary entry (2.5%).
| On-Line Local Economic Development Resource Handbook |
The goal of this assignment is to create a handbook of useful resources and analysis on local economic development that will be available online and available to other students and the world at large. The class as a whole will decide on the elements/entries to be included in the handbook. Each student will then be responsible for writing at least two entries for the handbook. Students may use text, tables, graphics and photographs in the entries. Creativity, clarity, brevity and analytical rigor are encouraged. (In addition, each student will write at least two short glossary entries -- e.g., 20 - 100 words each).
Emphasis
of handbook: Each entry should provide a concise, stand-alone explanation
of a specific economic development theme or topic. It should allow the
reader to quickly get up to speed on the topic, including (where appropriate):
basic definitions, explanation of concepts, historical background, examples,
and major debates or controversies. In addition, do provide links and a
brief bibliography in case the reader would like to examine the issue in
more depth (either in theory, case studies, policy descriptions, etc.).
The entry should, therefore, NOT be just a page of links to outside resources.
(Nor should it be a patchwork quilt of outside quotes and bullet points
from other sources.) It should instead be primarily an analytically rigorous
exploration of the topic.
Format: the handbook will be in the form of a series of web pages. In the past, I had students use Adobe Dreamweaver to create html pages. However, the recent emergence of a wide range of web content options (Tumblr, wordpress, etc.) gives us more choices. We will decide, as a class, on a common platform for the handbook by late January. (I will help you develop a common format. No prior web page skills required. Some class time will be allocated for work sessions.) I am leaning towards using wordpress, since it has more relevant features than Tumblr and is more friendly than Dreamweaver. (Here are some examples of wordpress pages: "The Lean Years" Conference" (UM arch + planning doctoral students); aftercity.mit.edu; "My Hometown is better than yours". Here is a UM Library wordpress tutorial.
Topics will include: key programs, important economic development concepts, case studies (best practices and otherwise), profiles of individual local economies, analyses of contemporary economic development controversies, links to further resources, glossary of important terms.
| DATE | 1
|
2
|
G
|
PROJECT STEP (1 - round one; 2 - round two; G - glossary) |
| Jan 26 | 1 |
selection of first round of topics (WORK SESSION) | ||
| Jan 26 | 1 |
2 |
G |
form editing groups of 3 students each |
| Feb 21 | 1 |
submit draft versions of round one entries (paper format) to editing groups (with initial comments for Feb 23, and final comments returned by March 6 or earlier). | ||
| Feb 23 | 2 |
selection of second round of topics (WORK SESSION) | ||
| April 3 | G |
selection of glossary entries (2 per student) | ||
| April 3 | 2 |
submit draft versions of round two entries (paper format) to editing groups (with comments returned by April 9 or earlier). | ||
| April 10 - 12 | 1 |
2 |
G |
PRESENTATIONS / WORK SESSIONS: Editing Handbook Entries and Posting to the web; Problem-Solving Web/Format Issues |
| April 10 - 12 | 1 |
2 |
G |
students begin posting draft entries to the web. |
| April 17 | 1 |
2 |
G |
DRAFT web page completed and ready for last round of comments/revisions -- initial revisions and formatting of resource pages (each student should carefully read all the web pages and email to individual students their comments) |
| April 25 | 1 |
2 |
G |
FINAL VERSION posted (April 25, 12:00 noon). web page completed and ready to go public -- all entries completed. |
| April 25 - 27 | 1 |
2 |
G |
Instructor evaluates and grades handbook entries |
EXAMPLES OF TOPICS (partial list):
| Category | Topic |
| downtown retail revitalization | |
| case study | economic development on Native American reservations |
| case study | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |
| case study | prisons as economic development |
| case study | River Rouge plant |
| case study | Tennessee Valley Authority |
| case study | the economic impact of recent welfare reform policies in the US |
| concept / theory / methods | central place theory |
| concept / theory / methods | comparative advantage / absolute advantage |
| concept / theory / methods | export base / economic base model |
| concept / theory / methods | flexible specialization / post-Fordism |
| concept / theory / methods | forward and backward linkages |
| concept / theory / methods | informal sector |
| concept / theory / methods | input-output analysis |
| concept / theory / methods | location theory |
| concept / theory / methods | measures of poverty |
| concept / theory / methods | producer services |
| concept / theory / methods | product and profit cycles |
| concept / theory / methods | spatial division of labor |
| concept / theory / methods | the "spatial-mismatch" hypothesis |
| concept / theory / methods | venture capital |
| concept / theory / methods | vertical integration and disintegration |
| finance | business improvement districts (BID) |
| finance | Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) |
| finance | Industrial Revenue Bonds (IRB) / Industrial Development Bonds |
| finance | Micro-credit programs |
| finance | Tax Increment Financing (TIF) |
| finance | Tax Abatement Programs |
| institutions | Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) |
| institutions | community development corporations (CDCs) |
| institutions | Downtown Development Authorities (DDA) |
| institutions | International Finance Corporation (World Bank subsidiary) |
| institutions | International Monetary Fund (IMF) |
| institutions | Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) |
| institutions | public-private partnerships |
| institutions | the constitutionality of economic development planning |
| institutions | the role of community colleges in vocational training / economic development |
| institutions | World Bank |
| Michigan case study | Michigan Strategic Fund |
| Michigan case study | Michigan Economic Development Corporation |
| Michigan case study | Michigan Renaissance Zones |
| Michigan case study | Michigan Smart Zones |
| place-specific policy | brownfield redevelopment as an economic development strategy |
| place-specific policy | casinos as economic development |
| place-specific policy | enterprise zones / empowerment zone programs in the US |
| place-specific policy | free trade zones |
| place-specific policy | industrial retention programs |
| place-specific policy | job training programs, such as JTPA |
| place-specific policy | micro-enterprise development |
| place-specific policy | Neighborhood-based business associations |
| place-specific policy | research parks |
| place-specific policy | the development role of public authorities |
| place-specific policy | the relationship between city planning departments and economic development offices |
| place-specific policy | the structure and impact of local hiring requirements |
| place-specific policy | university - industry partnerships |
| urbanization process | agglomeration economies, including localization and urbanization economies |
| urbanization process | deindustrialization |
| urbanization process | dual labor markets |
| urbanization process | e-commerce and its impact on the local retail sector |
| urbanization process | endogenous vs. exogenous growth |
| urbanization process | gentrification |
| urbanization process | new international division of labor (NIDL) |
| urbanization process | the urban underclass |