Students are expected
to complete all the required readings before the scheduled class time, actively
participate in class discussions and presentations, and prepare several written
assignments over the semester. Evaluation of your work will be based
on substantive content, analytical rigor, and writing quality. Be sure
to follow appropriate citation guidelines in
all your work. Late assignments will result in point reductions.
|Assignments and deadlines (subject to change)
||Format (papers double-spaced)
||Percent of Grade
|Short Paper #1
|Short Paper #2
|group project: select groups (2-3 students)
||email to instructor with names
|group project: submit a concise description of the proposed project
|group project: presentation
||Apr 15, 17
|group project: written final version
||12-15 pages suggested, plus any graphics.
Final Exam/Essay (questions handed out April 17)
||Apr 30 (5:00 pm)
Format and Style Guidelines (READ
- Please use a single staple in the upper left-hand corner. You do NOT
need a cover page. Do NOT staple like a bound book, and do NOT include
a plastic cover. (Those formalities simply make it harder to read your
- Write concise, analytical answers.
- IMPORTANT: Use complete and
correct citations. Refer to all readings used (including course
readings and materials found on the Internet). Incorporate the ideas
from multiple sources (rather than basing your essay on just one
text). You are encouraged to also incorporate ideas from the recommended
readings and/or outside sources. If you have any questions about writing and academic integrity, please talk with either the GSI or the instructor.
- You may strongly agree with the class readings, vehemently object,
be ambivalent, or not be moved either way. In any case, be thoughtful,
reflective, critical and nuanced in your essay answers.
- You are encouraged to discuss the readings with other students. However,
each student is expected to submit his/her own individual, original
- Page length: double-spaced, not counting the bibliography / page of citations. Please use an easily readable font style (e.g., Times) and font size (e.g., 12 point), with adequate margins (e.g., 1 inch on all sides, or 1 inch top/bottom and 1.25 inches on the sides).
- additional writing advice
Assignment One (due Thursday, Feb 20)
Answer ONE of the questions below. Read
the instructions above about format and style. Please refer to assigned readings to support your argument. (Feel free to
refer to other sources as well.) Page length: 5-6 pages (not counting the bibliography).
- Water and Sustainability: The path towards more sustainable communities arguably requires changes in ways that cities and regions extract, use, distribute and conserve natural resources: air, land, energy, minerals, flora, fauna, water, etc. Examine the distinctiveness of water as a natural resource and the resulting form/dynamics of water resource policies and politics/conflicts. That is, how is water different from other natural resources, and what implications do these specific characteristics of water resources have on shaping a sustainable water resource strategy?
- The compact cities debate: The current state of thinking about the relationship between urban form and sustainability can be confusing. Are compact cities really more environmentally friendly? Referring to class readings (and, optionally, selected other readings), distill the central areas of agreement and controversy. What claims are best supported by the evidence, and what claims are the weakest? Explain the difference. (Where useful, distinguish between the different methods used to evaluate the compact cities/sustainability relationship: e.g., before-after studies, large-scale statistical modeling, simulation, etc.). In the end, under what circumstances should planners pursue the compact city as a path towards sustainability?
- Fracking: Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) represents a major source of potential domestic energy production, a high-paying growth sector, and a new set of complex environmental challenges. For urban planners, fracking also raises a complex set of questions about sustainability, land use regulation, state vs. local authority, etc. Your task: select a hypothetical audience: (a) a city council, (b) a local planning commission, or (c) an audience of professional planners. Write a concise document (e.g., a primer) on what planners should know about fracking, including the implications for local (or regional) land use planning.
- Local Sustainability Plans: Referring to a selection of sustainability plans (e.g., from the February 6-11 readings and/or elsewhere), what is the current state of local planning for sustainability? For example, what common goals and strategies do you identify among the plans? Is there a shared definition (either explicit or implied) of "sustainability"? What differentiates stronger vs. weaker sustainability plans? Where might there be room for improvement?
Assignment Two (due March 25)
[to be posted]
Take-Home Essay/Final Exam (6 pages total; due April 30, 5:00 pm)
This is a take-home essay exam. Your answers are due no later than 5 pm April 30. Please structure your essay carefully (i.e., think and outline your argument before you write), and illustrate with brief examples where necessary. Be sure to answer each part of the question. Refer to the class readings where appropriate. (If you use direct quotes, place the material inside quotation marks and provide a citation, including the page number. Even if you just summarize material, be sure to cite. See my web page on writing & citation formats.) You will be graded based on your knowledge of the material; the logic, structure and thoughtfulness of your argument; and the fit between the question and your answer. Your answers are short, so be concise; get to the point quickly. Avoid restating platitudes and truisms; instead, strive for analytical rigor (and don't be afraid to note contradictions where necessary). Clearly define terms. Be sure your answer is double-spaced, with page numbers, and a single staple. Good luck!
[to be posted]
Group Project: An Analysis of an eco-eco conflict and/or a sustainability effort
Due Dates (revised):
- Select Groups of 2-3 students by Feb 11.
- Each group submits a 2-page description of the proposed project by Feb 18
- Presentations the week of April 15-17 (ca. 20 minutes per group)
- Final written version due April 22
(Length: 12-15 pages suggested, plus graphics and visuals. As always, please engage proper citation practices.)
PRESENTATION FORMAT and What to Distribute BEFORE the presentation
- Presentations the week of April 15-17: ca. 25-30 minutes per group: 15 minutes presentation + 10-15 minutes feedback.
- Optional: if appropriate, feel free to use the digital projector in the classroom and/or distribute materials.
- Please allow enough time during your time slot to allow for in-depth discussion and feedback.
- TWO DAYS BEFORE YOUR PRESENTATION, please post your project title, abstract, and other information at the google doc page [link to be posted].
You may choose to examine either a single or multiple cases. The case(s) may be either in the US and/or international. Be sure to examine both economic and environmental concerns. Your emphasis may be either on the sources of the conflict itself and/or on strategies to resolve the conflict (ideally both). Below is a selected list of student-selected topics from past years that suggests the broad range of possible topics for either the individual paper or group project.
- Reducing Automobile Use in Metropolitan Chicago
- Oil Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
- Managing conflicts between economic development and water pollution in metropolitan areas in Korea: A comparative case study by contrasting a successful and an unsuccessful case.
- Ecotourism in Costa Rica
- State and Regional Growth Management Planning: A Critique of Existing
- Methods and Tools
- Watershed Preservation in the New York City Region
- Comparison of Lodi and Pittsfield Townships Built Out
- US Forest Service and subsistence communities
- rain forests in Ecuador and Indonesia
- lead poison and abatement
- The Netherlands Environmental Policy Plan
- Korean nuclear industry and pollution
- ISTEA and its environmental impact
- change in takings laws, shift from environmental interests to property rights
- rural/farm development and farmland preservation
- a case study on river basin as a basis of regional environmental planning
- Turkey river dam projects: international conflicts
- wetlands: no net loss and mitigation banking
- brownfield site development and environmental racism in Trenton, NJ and Camden, NJ
- comparison of alternative views of nature from different cultures (Native American, ancient, etc.)
- Environmental Taxes: Use in Europe and applicability in the U.S.
- California water policy
- the feasibility and meaning of a Sustainable Home
- the environmental impacts of Neo-traditional planning
- Pollution Credit Trading programs
- the over-development of Barnegat Bay, NJ
- Forestry in B.C., Washington and Oregon
- Int'l Conflicts of Siting Taiwanese nuclear waste in North Korea
- The European Commission's "Green Paper" and the compact city debate
- Environmental Impact of Immigration in the U.S.
- Oil Exploration in Nigeria and Ecuador
- The Port of New York-New Jersey: Dredging Controversy
- Environmental Accounting: Alternative Economic Indicators
- Land preservation in the Pinelands vs. the Adirondack State Park
- protection of New York City watersheds in upstate New York
- The Three Gorges dam project, Yangtze River
- Narmada River dam controversy in India
Here are some possible topics that are particularly timely:
- Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and the impacts/dynamics of local land markets and economies
- the incorporation of global climate change into city plans
- the current controversy around the UN's "Agenda 21"