Philosophy 152 Philosophy of Human Nature Darwall Fall 1996 INTRODUCTION I. Human beings seem to be very interested in human beings. literature, films, drama, the human sciences: anthropology, much of psychology, sociology, economics, etc. II. Why are we human being so intensely interested in our own species? Do you agree that this is an interesting question? Note: if you do, then you must be interested in our own species, since you are interested in why your species is this way. Anyway, why? a. self-consciousness? (explains how we can be aware but not why) b. desire to understand ourselves? why? c. desire to see where we fit in the world? meaning of life? d. desire understand our relation to God? to Nature? to nature? to other species? e. important for questions of ethics? What has value? What are our obligations? A human ideal? (Aristotle, Marx) f. Other reasons? III. We might broadly distinguish two kinds of interests: a. cognitive--the desire to know and understand our species and its relations to other things. b. ethical--the desire to live a good life. IV. Philosophers and thoughtful practitioners of other disciplines have speculated about humanity from a variety of philosophical perspectives (metaphysical, ethical, epistemological, religious) for centuries. In the western tradition, at least since Socrates turned the attention of Greek thought from questions about the nature of the universe to philosophical questions about human life. What are we? What can we know? What is a good human life? V. We will be reading, thinking about, discussing, and writing about a number of these ranging from Plato in 4th/5thC BC Athens to the contemporary biologist E. O. Wilson. They can be roughly characterized as follows: A. Metaphysical/Religious Theories of Humanity as part of a Cosmic Order. Plato, Aristotle, Mencius, Aquinas. B. Secular Theories of Humanity as an Object of the Empirical Sciences Hume, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wilson C. Theories of Human Freedom Sartre, De Beauvoir VI. There are, of course, many interesting differences within these categories. A. Aristotle/Mencius vs. Plato: Immanence vs. Transcendence B. Aristotle/Mencius/Plato vs. Aquinas: Not-explicitly- religious vs. Religious C. Hume vs. Marx/Nietzsche: Conservative vs. Radical VII. And also fascinating themes and parallels. A. Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Sartre: the subconscious and self-consciousness B. Sartre, De Beauvoir: Nonfeminist and Feminist Existentialism C. Hume, Wilson: "Invisible Hand" explanations of apparently transcendental phenomena, e.g. freedom, moral judgment. VIII. Syllabus IX. Requirements X. If time: Evaluating Arguments