489 Reliability of the Conventional, Digital and CT Created Cephalograms

Thursday, March 22, 2012: 3:30 p.m. - 4:45 p.m.
Presentation Type: Poster Session
A. GHONEIMA, Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, S.F. ALBARAKATI, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, king Saud university,College of dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, A. BAYSAL, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kayseri, Turkey, T. UYSAL, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey, and K.S. KULA, Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, University of Indiana - Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
Objective: The purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of skeletal and dental measurements of lateral cephalograms created from computed tomography (CT) scan compared to the conventional and digital lateral cephalograms.

Method: Following reliability studies, CT records of 30 patients were obtained from the archives. The lateral cephalometric radiographs of these patients were initially manually traced. Then the same radiographs were scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging software Version 11 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Totally 16 (10 angular and 6 linear) measurements were performed. Cephalometric measurements performed on conventional, digital and CT created cephalograms were compared statistically using repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 level.

Result: The intrarater reliability test for each method showed high values r >.090 except for the mandibular length which had a correlation of 0.82 for the CT created cephalogram. Five measurements (N-A-Pog, N-S, ANS-PNS, Co-ANS and Co-Gn) were found to be significantly different between the CT created and conventional cephalograms and three measurements (SNB, ANB, and /1-MP) were found to be significantly different between the CT created and digital cephalograms.

Conclusion: The measurement differences between the conventional, digital and CT created cephalograms are statistically significant, but clinically acceptable.


Keywords: Digital image analysis and Radiology
See more of: Diagnostic Sciences II
See more of: Diagnostic Sciences