705 Accuracy of Digital Model Articulation for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations

Friday, March 23, 2012: 10:45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.
Presentation Type: Oral Session
D.J. POTICNY, Dept. of Cariology and Restorative Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and D. FASBINDER, Dept. of Cariol & Rest. Sci. & Endo, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy of two scanning techniques used for virtual model alignment when designing restorations with a chairside CAD/CAM system. 

Methods:  A master model was developed with a crown preparation (tooth #14) and an occlusal stop distal to the preparation (Distal Stop) and adjacent crown preparations (teeth #2 and #3) with no occlusal stop distal to the preparations (Distal Extension).  For each test group, the maxillary and mandibular teeth were scanned with a CEREC AC (Sirona Dental Systems) to create ten independent data files.  One group for each crown preparation used a bite registration scanning technique and another group used the buccal bite scanning technique to virtually align the models for the crown design.  Each file was used to design and mill a ceramic crown (IPS Empress CAD/Ivoclar) that was seated on the master model with a silicon material.  The vertical dimension was recorded with a polyvinylsiloxane bite registration material to measure variation from the control model.  The bite registration was sectioned mesiodistally and measured in cross-section at 20X using a measuring microscope and 3D software program.

Results:

  

Occlusal vertical dimension (microns)

Distal Extension

Distal Stop

Master (control)

3125.12+28.95 a

3032.17+12.08 a

Bite Registration Scan

3279.52+69.41 b

3175.06+53.08 b

Buccal Bite Scan

3104.37+35.91 a

3048.51+44.86 a

The data was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and significant differences were determined with a Tukey test (p<0.05).  Letters indicate significantly different groups.

Conclusions:

There was no significant difference in the occlusal vertical dimension between the master model and the crowns made with the buccal bite scan technique.  There was a significant difference in the occlusal vertical dimension between the master model and the crowns made with the bite registration scanning technique.  The buccal bite scanning technique resulted in a more accurate occlusal mounting compared to the bite registration technique.


Keywords: CAD/CAM, Computers, Effectiveness, Occlusion and Technology