842 Excess-Cement Clean-Up of Novel Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement: Tack Light-Cure Option

Friday, March 23, 2012: 2 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.
Presentation Type: Poster Session
A. FALSAFI1, T. TRAN1, Y. WANG1, T. TON1, and J. OXMAN2, 13M ESPE Dental Products, Saint Paul, MN, 23M ESPE, St. Paul, MN
Objectives: Desirable handling characteristics of dental cements are of significant importance to the dentists. This study investigated several key properties of RelyX Luting Plus Automix (RLP-AMX, 3M ESPE), a new automix resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cement, including the ease and speed of excess cement clean-up.  RLP-AMX is a multi-dose paste/paste system that offers a tack light-cure option for faster excess cement removal.

Methods: 135 dentists that utilized different cements in their practice were asked to evaluate several handling and clinical characteristics associated with the new cement in a clinical trial conducted by an independent agency. The cement was used according to manufacturer’s directions. Dentists were given two choices on the cement excess clean-up:  traditional 2 minute wait, or 5 sec tack-light-cure of the cement on each side.  Dentists rated performance criteria for excess cement removal and the speed of clean-up.

Results: Responses were analyzed for each characteristic and summarized in tables below.  Additional data showed about 1% post-op sensitivity and overall satisfaction greater than 90%.

 

 

Ease of Excess-Cement Removal, % dentists

 

 

Self-Cure Mode

Tack Light-Cure Mode

 

Very Easy

37

34

 

Easy

42

40

 

Neutral

13

10

 

Difficult, but acceptable

3

5

 

Very difficult, not acceptable

2

1

 

 

 

Faster and easier excess cement clean-up for tack light-cure option, % dentists 

Strongly agree

38

Agree

40

Neutral

18

Disagree

4

Conclusions: Chi-Square and Confidence Interval tests for one and two proportions were performed.  Data for the ease of clean-up showed no statistical difference between the proportions of dentists who found the self-cure option easy/very easy, versus the number of dentists who found the tack light-cure option easy/very easy. (Using a t-test for two proportions, p=0.59).  Calculating a 95% Confidence Interval based on this data, it’s estimated that 71-85% of all dentists would find that the light-cure option provides a faster excess cement clean-up.


Keywords: Cements, Clinical trials, Dental materials, Fluoride and Glass ionomers
Presenting author's disclosure statement: 3M Employee