994 Influence of surface treatment of glass-ceramics on TBS of RMGICs

Friday, March 23, 2012: 3:30 p.m. - 4:45 p.m.
Presentation Type: Poster Session
Y. HOKII, K. TANAKA, F. FUSEJIMA, and T. SAKUMA, Research&Development Dept, GC corporation, Tokyo, Japan
Objective s: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface treatment for ceramics on tensile bond strength (TBS) of an experimental resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) “FL-901”.

Methods: Specimens of Lithium disilicate glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were prepared with #600-grit silicon carbide paper. Prior to preparing the cement layer, the surfaces were subjected to the following treatment: (1)untreated; (2)etching by 4.7% hydrofluoric acid solution for 20s; (3)etching followed by ceramic primer (GC) treatment. The bonding area (3mm diameter, 0.1mm thickness) was defined by plastic tape and the cement layer was prepared with FujiCEM Automix (GC) and FL-901 according to manufacurer’s instructions. Stainless-steel rods were cemented with G-CEM Automix (GC). The specimens were stored at 37°C and 100% R.H. for 1hour, and then submerged in 37°C distilled water for 23hours. Thermal-cycling was (5-55°C 2000cycles) performed for each condition. TBS was measured using AG-I/20kNT (Shimadzu) (Crosshead speed 1mm/min.). Fracture morphology of specimens was also checked (interfacial; IF, cohesive; CF and mix; IF+CF).  

Results: FL-901 was significantly higher TBS than that of FujiCEM on #600-grit surfaces (t-test, *:p<0.05). TBS could not be elevated by surface treatment (t-test, **:p<0.05).

Conclusion s: TBS of FL-901 was remarkably higher than that of FujiCEM on #600-grit surface. There are no effects on surface treatment for TBS of FL-901. It was suggested   FL-901 did not need pre-treatment to work with glass-ceramic prosthesis.

 

 

   TBS(n=5) [MPa]

Fracture morphology(%)

#600

etching

Etching

+priming

#600

etching

etching+priming

IF

CF

IF+CF

IF

CF

IF+CF

IF

CF

IF+CF

24hours

FL-901

15.7(2.9)*

15.1(3.3)**

16.2(2.8)**

 

100

 

 

100

 

 

100

 

FujiCEM

11.2(2.7)

15.8(5.0)

14.8(4.2)

  

80

20

 

80

20

20

80

 

TC2000

FL-901

12.7(2.9)*

11.2(5.4)**

8.9(2.0)**

  

60

40

40

60

 

80

20

 

FujiCEM

5.8(3.4)

8.1(2.2)

6.8(1.1)

60

20

20

20

40

40

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Keywords: Cements, Ceramics, Dental materials, Glass ionomers and Surfaces
Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>