232 Strength of Porcelain and Zirconia Submitted to Different Cooling Methods

Thursday, March 22, 2012: 2 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.
Presentation Type: Poster Session
A.A. ALMEIDA JR.1, B.R. GALVAO1, D. LONGHINI1, N.B. DOMINGUES1, C. SANTOS2, F.O. ABI-RACHED1, C.A.S. CRUZ1, R.G. FONSECA1, and G.L. ADABO3, 1Departament of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Universidade Est. Paulista Julio Mesquita, Araraquara - SP, Brazil, 2Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo, Lorena-SP, Brazil, 3Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araraquara - São Paulo, Brazil
Objectives: To investigate the three-point flexural strength of monolayer and bilayer porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) bars submitted to three cooling methods.

Methods: Forty-five specimens were made for each following design groups: (PM)monolithic specimens of veneer porcelain Vita VM9 (Vita, Germany); (ZM)monolithic specimens of zirconia ZiHP (ProtMat, Brazil); (PB)bilayer specimens zirconia/porcelain with porcelain in lower surface; (ZB)bilayer specimens porcelain/zirconia with zirconia in lower surface. Each group was cooled by three different methods after porcelain sintering: slow – specimens were cooled inside the turned off furnace; normal – specimens were removed from the furnace and cooled in ambient air at room temperature; and fast – specimens were removed at about 900oC from the furnace and cooled by compressed air for 10sec. Specimens were polished and tested in water at 37oC (n=15) in a universal test machine. Maximum load at fracture was recorded and equations for simple and composite structures were used to calculate the flexural strength. Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (p<0.05) and Tukey test separately for each design.

Results: Data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Mean of flexural strength, standard deviation, coefficient of variance, significance level and Tukey test.

GROUPS

COOLING

AVERAGE

 STDEV

COVAR

p

TUKEY

PM

SLOW

74.4

9.0

12.1%

0.582

ns

NORMAL

75.4

7.7

10.2%

ns

FAST

77.9

11.1

14.2%

ns

ZM

SLOW

835.5

129.9

15.5%

0.541

ns

NORMAL

873.0

140.1

16.1%

ns

FAST

817.1

95.2

11.6%

ns

PB

SLOW

49.3

10.1

20.5%

0.002

B

NORMAL

56.1

11.0

19.6%

AB

FAST

67.5

16.7

24.8%

A

ZB

SLOW

572.5

136.5

23.8%

0.066

ns

NORMAL

590.6

117.4

19.9%

ns

FAST

691.3

177.8

25.7%

ns

Conclusions: Different cooling methods affected only the flexural strength of bilayer specimens with porcelain in lower surface. The complex residual thermal stresses generated in bilayer specimens might be associated to thermal tempering stress, which probably did not occur on slow cooling method.

This abstract is based on research that was funded entirely or partially by an outside source: FAPESP #2009/17735-8 ; #2010/05469-9

Keywords: Ceramics, Dental materials, Porcelain systems and Zirconia