American Farmland Trust, 1995. Future Urban Growth in California’s Central Valleys: The Bottom Line for Agriculture and Taxpayers.

American Farmland Trust, 1993a. “Is Farmland Protection a Community Investment? How to Do a Cost of Community Services Study.” Spring.

American Farmland Trust and Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District.  1993b. “The Cost of Community Services in Madison Village and Township, Lake County, Ohio.” October.

Arend C, A, et al, 1996. Southeast Michigan Agriculture Land Preservation Project. The University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment.

Atkinson Glen and Ted Oleson, 1996. “Urban Sprawl as path Dependent Process”. Journal of Economic Issues, June Vol. 30, No. 2 p.p.609.

Bank of America, 1995. “ Beyond Sprawl: New Patterns of Growth to Fit the New California. “ A report prepared by the Bank of America, The Resources Agency of California, Greenbelt Alliance, and Low-income Housing Fund.

Breslaw, Jon A. 1990. “Density and Urban Sprawl: Comment”, Land Economics, Nov 1990 Vol. 66 No. 4 p.p. 464 (5).

Burchell, Robert, et al.,1998. The Costs of Sprawl Revisited: The Evidence of Sprawl’s Negative and Positive Impacts-Revised Research Plan, (New Brunswick: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research Center for Urban Policy Research). (New)

Burchell, Robert and Nancy Neuman, 1996. The Literature of The Costs of Sprawl: Section I of the Michigan Fiscal Impact Study. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG).

Downs, Anthony, 1998. “The big picture: How America’s cities are growing”, Brookings Review:16 no4:8-11. 
Duncan, James E., 1989. The Search for Efficient Urban Growth Patterns, Tallahassee: Department of Community Affairs.

Ewing, Reid H., 1994. “Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature Review”, Environmental and Urban Issues, Winter. Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems, Florida Atlantic University.
Frank, James E., 1989. The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature, Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.

Gieske, E., 1994. Social and Political Factors Contributing to the Problems of Urban Sprawl in metropolitan Detroit, University of Michigan-Dearborn.

Gordon, Peter and Richardson, Harry Ward, 1998. “Prove it: the costs and benefits of sprawl”, Brookings Review  16 no4:23-5 Fall '98.

Hayward, Steven, 1998. “Legends of the sprawl; Suburban growth”, Policy Review  no91:26-32 Sep/Oct '98.

Longman, Phillip, 1998. “Who pays for sprawl?; Hidden subsidies”, U.S. News & World Report  124 no16:22-3 Apr 27 '98.

Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 1974. Land Taxation & Michigan. 

Michigan Society of Planning Officials (MSPO), 1995. Patterns on the Land: Out Choices-Our Future.

Peiser, Richard B. “Density and Urban Sprawl: reply”, Land Economics, Nov. 1990 Vol. 66 No.4 p.p.469 (4).

Perry, Erin N., 1997. Planning against sprawl : agricultural lands and open space preservation planning in Washtenaw County, MI : practicum/professional project for the Master of Science in Resource Policy and Behavior and Master of Urban Planning degrees, University of Michigan.

Schmid, Allan A. et Al., 1997. Impact of Population Growth and Distribution on Local Government Expenditures in Michigan. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. East Lansing Michigan. 

Thompson, J. William, 1998. “Is there a prescription for sprawl?”,  Landscape Architecture  88 no9:66-71+ Sep '98.

Tischler, Paul, 1997. “Fiscal Issues in Manageing Growth”, Managing Growth in America’s Communities, p.p. 60, compiled by Porter, Douglas R..