British Energy Takes Big Write-Down on Plants

June 4, 2003
By HEATHER TIMMONS 
 

LONDON, June 3 - British Energy, which owns eight nuclear
power plants in Britain and part of the Three Mile Island
plant in Pennsylvania, said today that it had drastically
lowered its estimate of what its power plants were worth,
leading to a loss of £4.3 billion ($7 billion) in the
fiscal year ended March 31. 

The company, based in East Kilbride, Scotland, said it had
written down the value of its British nuclear plants by
£3.6 billion, or more than 80 percent, and that of a
coal-fired plant in Eggborough, England, by £151 million. 

Excluding the write-downs, British Energy lost £130 million
for the fiscal year, a reversal from a £42 million profit
the year before. 

"The past year has been traumatic for British Energy and
its stakeholders," said its chairman, Adrian Montague, in a
statement today. A combination of high fixed costs at the
nuclear plants, a decline in power prices, a number of
power interruptions and a "bleak outlook" for future prices
contributed to the loss, Mr. Montague said. 

As deregulation has divided Britain's electricity system
into separate power producers and distributors in the last
decade, the producers have suffered from overcapacity and
low prices. Wholesale power prices have fallen some 40
percent since deregulation. British Energy grew so
financially weak last fall that it needed a government
bailout to avoid bankruptcy; the government agreed to pay
£2 billion to help cover the company's nuclear-related
liabilities. 

British Energy's stock has lost more than 95 percent of its
value in the last year; it closed today at 4.35 pence in
London. 

British Energy's future hinges on obtaining approval from
the European Commission in Brussels for a restructuring
plan that includes the £2 billion in aid from the British
Department of Trade and Industry. 

Under the aid package's terms, a government-backed fund
would cover any shortfalls in British Energy's ability to
pay for the cost of decommissioning its nuclear power
plants as their useful life ends; in return, British Energy
would pay a portion of its future profits to the fund. The
plan was submitted March 7, and a decision is expected
within 12 months. 

Some analysts say that the plan is certain to win approval,
so that with last year's losses behind it, British Energy
should have smooth sailing ahead. "It is going to be a
viable company," said Iain Turner, an energy analyst at
Deutsche Bank. 

Others disagree that approval of the plan is a sure thing.
It is opposed by an unusual coalition of environmentalists,
nonnuclear energy producers and companies that make
electricity from renewable sources like sunlight and wind. 

The three groups oppose the plan on the ground that it
favors British Energy and its nuclear plants over rivals.
The AES Corporation of Arlington, Va., which owns Drax, the
largest coal-fired power plant in Britain, petitioned the
European Commission to reject the plan because it would
artificially depress power prices. Greenpeace and
Ecotricity, a British wind and solar energy company,
protested that the plan would leave no room in the market
for alternative energy sources. "British Energy's position
has never looked more bleak," Greenpeace said today in a
statement. 

Under an earlier restructuring plan, British Energy was to
sell off its half-interest in AmerGen, a joint venture with
the Exelon Corporation of Chicago, by June 30 of this year.
AmerGen owns Three Mile Island and the Oyster Creek nuclear
power plant in Waretown, N.J. Antinuclear activists in New
Jersey are campaigning to shut down Oyster Creek by 2009
because of the threat of terrorism and the large number of
people who live near it. 

British Energy said in March that it had yet to receive a
suitable offer for its stake in AmerGen. Company executives
told analysts today on a conference call that British
Energy was in talks with several companies about AmerGen,
but did not give specifics. 

In April, British Energy, which supplies electricity to one
out of every six homes in Britain, paid off a £650 million
government loan using the proceeds from its sale of a
Canadian subsidiary last year, according to Bloomberg News.



Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company