Almost All in U.S. Have Been Exposed to Fallout, Study Finds

March 1, 2002 

By JAMES GLANZ


 

In a preliminary study that takes into account not only
nuclear tests in Nevada but also nearly all American and
Soviet nuclear tests conducted overseas until they were
banned in 1963, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention has found that virtually every person who has
lived in the United States since 1951 has been exposed to
radioactive fallout. 

These new findings expand on those from five years ago by
the National Cancer Institute that showed that people
living in a long, plume-shaped region stretching from Idaho
and Montana to the Mississippi River and beyond had a
slightly higher risk of developing thyroid cancer because
of the Nevada tests. 

The new study, which was completed in August 2001 and was
first revealed yesterday in USA Today, suggests that for
all Americans born after 1951 "all organs and tissues of
the body have received some radiation exposure." The study
says in highly guarded terms that the global fallout could
eventually be responsible for more than 11,000 cancer
deaths in the United States. 

But the study said any medical implications were uncertain
because the average American had received almost 20 times
as much radiation from medical procedures like chest X-rays
as from fallout of all kinds over the same period. 

Dr. Charles Miller, chief of the radiation studies branch
at the agency's National Center for Environmental Health,
said the report was merely a "feasibility study" that
showed it was possible - should Congress request it - to
carry out a full analysis of the health risks of above-
ground nuclear testing. 

"We were trying to illustrate what could be done," Dr.
Miller said, adding that "it would be irresponsible for me
to speculate" on how accurate the estimate of 11,000 deaths
might be. 

Still, given the widespread exposures indicated by the
study, its tentative conclusions show that the government
has inadequately explained the cancer risks from nuclear
tests, said Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, who says
the follow-up research must be carried out. 

"If the threat of exposure had been related to Americans
sooner, early diagnosis and treatment may have saved many
of these lives," said Mr. Harkin, who has seen four
siblings die of cancer. "The release of this report is long
overdue." 

The United States conducted more than 200 above-ground, or
atmospheric, tests of nuclear weapons from 1951 to 1963,
about half of those at the Nevada Test Site, 65 miles
northwest of Las Vegas, and the others in the Marshall
Islands and elsewhere in the Pacific Ocean. Over the same
period, the Soviet Union exploded some 200 nuclear weapons
in tests on its own territory. 

Such tests release radioactive iodine, which decays away in
a matter of days, as well as longer-lived isotopes like
radioactive cesium and strontium, which take many decades
to disappear. The previous study, by the National Cancer
Institute, examined fallout patterns and cancer risks
caused by the release of iodine from the Nevada tests. 

"Their report, as far as determining the fallout levels,
was probably as good as could be done," said David Wheeler,
a health physicist at the Nevada Test Site. 

But he said that deriving cancer rates was a highly
uncertain process at best. Accordingly, the cancer
institute estimated that from 11,300 to 212,000 thyroid
cancers would result from this exposure. Most thyroid
cancers are treatable, but a small percentage result in
death. 

The Centers for Disease Control study also looks at
exposures to the long-lived radioactive elements, which can
be carried thousands of miles, potentially causing
leukemia, breast cancer, liver cancer and other types of
cancer. The study estimated the exposure patterns by taking
into account the winds after tests, the amount of fallout
created in each type of explosion and the rates at which
different kinds of radioactive particles fall from the sky.


While the average exposure of an American because of the
fallout is low, it increases each person's chance of
developing cancer by a tiny amount, potentially leading to
a larger number of deaths by cancer. 

The study finds that nearly all cancers caused by tests at
the Nevada site are likely to be related to the iodine that
was the focus of the earlier work. The overseas tests could
cause cancer only through the long- lived elements. The
United States is not special in this regard; all nations
will have received the long-lived radioactivity, but the
Centers for Disease Control did not estimate cancer rates
elsewhere. 

Dr. Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy
and Environmental Research, an organization dedicated to
nuclear disarmament, said that while the average exposures
indicated by the C.D.C. study were low, concentrations in
specific areas - which still have not been determined - are
likely to have been far above those values. 

"There are people in these high fallout areas who are
seriously affected," Dr. Makhijani said. "There is no cause
for alarm, but there is a public health issue, and the
government is not facing up to it."


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company