From Rogue Nuclear Programs, Web of Trails Leads to Pakistan

January 4, 2004
By DAVID E. SANGER and WILLIAM J. BROAD 


The Pakistani leaders who denied for years that scientists
at the country's secret A. Q. Khan Research Laboratories
were peddling advanced nuclear technology must have been
averting their eyes from a most conspicuous piece of
evidence: the laboratory's own sales brochure, quietly
circulated to aspiring nuclear weapons states and a network
of nuclear middlemen around the world. 

The cover bears an official-looking seal that says
"Government of Pakistan" and a photograph of the father of
the Pakistani bomb, Abdul Qadeer Khan. It promotes
components that were spinoffs from Pakistan's
three-decade-long project to build a nuclear stockpile of
enriched uranium, set in a drawing that bears a striking
resemblance to a mushroom cloud. 

In other nations, such sales would be strictly controlled.
But Pakistan has always played by its own rules. 

As investigators unravel the mysteries of the North Korean,
Iranian and now the Libyan nuclear projects, Pakistan - and
those it empowered with knowledge and technology they are
now selling on their own - has emerged as the intellectual
and trading hub of a loose network of hidden nuclear
proliferators. 

That network is global, stretching from Germany to Dubai
and from China to South Asia, and involves many middlemen
and suppliers. But what is striking about a string of
recent disclosures, experts say, is how many roads appear
ultimately to lead back to the Khan Research Laboratories
in Kahuta, where Pakistan's own bomb was developed. 

In 2002 the United States was surprised to discover how
North Korea had turned to the Khan laboratory for an
alternative way to manufacture nuclear fuel, after the
reactors and reprocessing facilities it had relied on for
years were "frozen" under a now shattered agreement with
the Clinton administration. Last year, international
inspectors and Western intelligence agencies were surprised
again, this time by the central role Pakistan played in the
initial technology that enabled Iran to pursue a secret
uranium enrichment program for 18 years. 

The sources of Libya's enrichment program are still under
investigation, but those who have had an early glance say
they see "interconnections" with both Pakistan and Iran's
programs - and Libyan financial support for the Pakistani
program that stretches back three decades. 

Until two weeks ago, Pakistani officials had long denied
that any nuclear technology was transferred from their
laboratories. But now that story has begun to change, after
the Pakistani authorities, under pressure, began
interrogating scientists from the laboratory about their
assistance to other nuclear aspirants. Two weeks ago, Dr.
Khan himself was called in for what appears to have been a
respectful, and still inconclusive, questioning. 

Responding to requests relayed through associates, Dr. Khan
has recently denied that he aided atomic hopefuls. But
American and European officials note that in the 1980's he
repeatedly denied that Pakistan was at work on an atomic
bomb, which it finally tested in 1998. 

While American intelligence officials have gathered details
on the activities of the creator of the Pakistani bomb and
his compatriots for decades, four successive American
presidents have dealt with the issue extremely delicately,
turning modest sanctions against Pakistan on and off, for
fear of destabilizing the country when it was needed to
counter the Soviets in the 1980's, much as it is needed to
battle terrorism today. 

President Bush, who regularly talks about nuclear dangers,
has never mentioned Pakistan's laboratories or their
proliferation in public - probably out of concern of
destabilizing President Pervez Musharraf, who has survived
two assassination attempts in December. 

"He's been a stand-up guy when it comes to dealing with the
terrorists," Mr. Bush said of General Musharraf on
Thursday. "We are making progress against Al Qaeda because
of his cooperation." He dismissed a question about the
vulnerability of Pakistan's own nuclear weapons, saying,
"Yes, they are secure," then changed the subject. 

Yet when President Bush talks about the horrors that could
unfold if a nuclear weapon fell into the hands of
terrorists, it is Pakistan's combustible mix of expertise,
components, fuel and fully assembled weapons that springs
to the minds of American and European intelligence experts.
In public, the White House says it has received
"assurances" from Pakistan that if there ever were nuclear
exports they are finished. 

"There is this almost empty-headed recitation of assurances
that whatever Pakistan did in the past it's over, it's no
longer a problem," said one senior European diplomat with
access to much of the intelligence about proliferation.
"But there's is no evidence that it has ever stopped." 

Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the
International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations
organization charged with monitoring nuclear energy
worldwide, contends that the recent nuclear disclosures
show that the system put in place at the height of the cold
war to contain nuclear weapons technology has ruptured and
can no longer control the new nuclear trade. 

"The information is now all over the place, and that's what
makes it more dangerous than in the 1960's," Dr. ElBaradei
said. 

The Crucial Ingredient 

The biggest hurdle in making a nuclear weapon is not
designing the warhead, but getting the right fuel to create
an atomic explosion. One route is to extract plutonium from
nuclear reactors and reprocess it to produce more fuel,
known as creating a fuel cycle. The other is to extract
uranium from the ground and enrich it. 

The 1970 treaty on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons
was devised to control which countries could possess and
pursue nuclear arms. It allowed the United States, Britain,
France, the Soviet Union and China to keep all their
weapons but required all other signatories to forswear
nuclear arms. North Korea, Iran and Libya all signed,
allowing I.A.E.A. inspectors limited visits to verify that
countries producing nuclear fuel were truly using "atoms
for peace." Pakistan and India never signed, nor did
Israel. 

Aside from inspections, spy satellites and airborne
"sniffers" can usually pick out the huge complexes needed
to extract spent fuel from nuclear reactors and turn it
into bomb fuel. But after North Korea was caught cheating
by the United States in the early 1990's and was forced
into an agreement to "freeze" its reactor-and-reprocessing
complex at Yongbyon, the lesson was clear: to produce bomb
fuel, countries needed to take a more surreptitious route. 

Uranium enrichment was the most promising, because it
could take place in hidden facilities, emitting few traces.
And that was the technology that Dr. Khan perfected as his
laboratory raced to produce a nuclear bomb to keep up with
its rival, India. 

The key to the technology is the development of
centrifuges. These hollow tubes spin fast to separate a
gaseous form of natural uranium into U-238, a heavy
isotope, and U-235, a light one. The rare U-235 isotope is
the holy grail: it can easily split in two, releasing
bursts of nuclear energy. 

But making centrifuges is no easy trick. The rotors of
centrifuges, spinning at the speed of sound or faster, must
be very strong and perfectly balanced or they fly apart
catastrophically. 

To produce bomb-grade fuel, uranium must pass through
hundreds or thousands of centrifuges linked in a cascade,
until impurities are spun away and what remains is mainly
U-235 . The result is known as highly enriched uranium. 

Dr. Khan returned to Pakistan in 1976 after working in the
Netherlands, carrying extremely secret centrifuge designs -
a Dutch one that featured an aluminum rotor, and a German
one made of maraging steel, a superhard alloy. He was
charged with stealing the designs from a European
consortium where he worked. 

"The designs for the machines," said a secret State
Department memo at the time, "were stolen by a Pakistani
national." 

The steel rotor in the German design turned out to be
particularly difficult to make, but it could spin twice as
fast, meaning it produced more fuel. 

Dr. Khan's accomplishments turned him into a national hero.
In 1981, as a tribute, the president of Pakistan, Gen.
Mohammad Zia ul-Haq, renamed the enrichment plant the A. Q.
Khan Research Laboratories. 

Dr. Khan, a fervent nationalist, has condemned the system
that limits legal nuclear knowledge to the five major
nuclear powers, or that has ignored Israel's nuclear weapon
while focusing on the fear of an Islamic bomb. "All Western
countries," he was once quoted as saying, "are not only the
enemies of Pakistan but in fact of Islam." 

In the years before Pakistan's first test in 1998, Dr. Khan
and his team began publishing papers in the global
scientific literature on how to make and test its uranium
centrifuges. In the West, these publications would have
been classified secret or top secret. 

But Dr. Khan made no secret of his motive: he boasted in
print of circumventing the restrictions of the Western
nuclear powers, declaring in a 1987 paper that he sought to
pierce "the clouds of the so-called secrecy." Papers in
1987 and 1988 detailed how to take the next, difficult
steps in the construction of centrifuges - reaching beyond
first-generation aluminum rotors to produce more efficient
centrifuges out of maraging steel. 

David Albright, a former weapons inspector for the I.A.E.A,
said the American intelligence community viewed Dr. Khan's
papers as a boast. They proved that Pakistan "knew how to
build the G-2," a particularly complex design of German
origin. 

A 1991 paper by his colleagues at the laboratory gave more
details away, revealing how to etch special grooves on a
centrifuge's bottom bearing, a crucial part for aiding the
flow of lubricants in machines spinning at blindingly fast
speeds. 

A Pentagon program that tracks foreign scientific
publications has uncovered dozens of reports, scientific
papers and conference proceedings on uranium enrichment
that Dr. Khan and his colleagues published. While federal
and private experts agree that the blitz left much
confidential - including some crucial dimensions,
ingredients, manufacturing tricks and design secrets -
Pakistan was clearly proclaiming that it had mastered the
black art. 

"It was a signal to India and the West saying, `Look, we're
not the backward people you think we are,' " said Mark
Gorwitz, a nonproliferation expert who tracks the Pakistani
literature. 

The scientific papers were soon followed by sales
brochures. Much of the gear marketed by the Khan laboratory
was critical for anyone eager to make Dr. Khan's kind of
centrifuges. It included vacuum devices that attached to a
centrifuge casing and sucked out virtually all the air,
reducing friction around the spinning rotors. 

In 2000, the Pakistani government ran its own advertisement
announcing procedures for commercial exports of many types
of nuclear gear, including gas centrifuges and their parts,
according to a Congressional Research Service report
published in May. Many of the items, it noted, "would be
useful in a nuclear weapons program." 

Former American intelligence and nonproliferation experts
said the C.I.A. was aware of some, but not all, of these
activities, and began tracking scientists at the Khan
laboratory. 

But at every turn, overt pressure was weighed against
strategic interests. In the 1980's, Washington viewed
Pakistan as a critical ally in the covert war it was waging
against the Soviets in Afghanistan. By 1986, American
intelligence agencies concluded that Pakistan had succeeded
in making weapon-grade uranium, the sure sign that the
centrifuges worked. But that same year, Mr. Reagan
announced an aid package to Pakistan of more than $4
billion. 

The First Nuclear Deals 

What American intelligence agencies apparently did not
understand at the time was the pace at which Dr. Khan's
team was beginning to help other nations. 

It started as a quid pro quo with an old patron: China. A
declassified State Department memo, obtained by the
National Security Archive in Washington, concluded that
China, sometime after its first bomb tests in the
mid-1960's, had provided Pakistan technology for "fissile
material production and possibly also nuclear device
design." 

Years later, the flow reversed. Mr. Albright, who is the
president of the Institute for Science and International
Security, an arms control group in Washington, has
concluded that China was an early recipient of Pakistan's
designs for centrifuges. China had used an antiquated,
expensive process for enriching uranium, and the technology
Dr. Khan held promised a faster, cheaper, more efficient
path to bomb-making. 

But that was just the start. Evidence uncovered in recent
months shows that around 1987 Pakistan struck a deal with
Iran, which had tried unsuccessfully to master enrichment
technology on its own during its war with Iraq. The
outlines of the deal - pieced together from limited
inspections and documents turned over to the I.A.E.A. in
October - show that a centrifuge of Pakistani design
finally solved Iran's technological problems. That deal was
"a tremendous boost," Mr. Albright and his colleague, Corey
Hinderstein, said in a draft report on the Iranian program.
"The possession of detailed designs could allow Iran to
skip many difficult research steps," they added. 

The Iranian documents turned over to the I.A.E.A. make no
reference to Pakistan itself; they only point to its
signature technologies. 

"We have middlemen and suspicions," said a Western diplomat
with access to the documents. "There is a Pakistani tie for
sure, but we don't know the details." 

Iran's program fooled the I.A.E.A., which caught no whiff
of it during 18 years of inspections. But Pakistan's role
was also well hidden from American intelligence agencies. 

"We had some intelligence successes with Iran, we knew
about some of their enrichment efforts," said Gary Samore,
who headed up nonproliferation efforts in the Clinton
administration's National Security Council. "What we didn't
know was the Pakistan connection - that was a surprise. And
the extent of Pakistan's ties was, in retrospect, the
surprise of the 1990's." 

The Iranians were hardly satisfied customers. They had
gotten Pakistan's older models and were forced to slog
ahead slowly for two decades, foraging around the world for
parts, building experimental facilities involving a few
hundred centrifuges, but apparently failing to produce
enough fissile material for a bomb. 

If the Iranians were the turtle, the North Koreans proved
the hare. Around 1997, a decade after the Pakistani deal
with Iran, Dr. Khan made inroads with the government of Kim
Jong Il, as it sought a way to make nuclear fuel away from
the Yongbyon plant and the prying eyes of American
satellites. Dr. Khan began traveling to North Korea,
visiting 13 times, American intelligence officials said. 

During those visits, North Korea offered to exchange
centrifuge technology for North Korean missile technology,
enabling Pakistan to extend the reach of its nuclear
weapons across India. 

Again, American intelligence agencies missed many of the
signals. They knew of an experimental program, but it took
evidence from South Korea to demonstrate that North Korea
was moving toward industrial-level production. Then in the
summer of 2001, American spy satellites spotted missile
parts being loaded into a Pakistani cargo plane near
Pyongyang, the North Korean capital. The parts were assumed
to be the quid pro quo for the nuclear technology. 

Last spring, a few months after the deal was revealed in
The New York Times, the State Department announced some
sanctions against the Khan laboratory but cited the illegal
missile transactions. The State Department said it had
insufficient evidence to issue sanctions for a nuclear
transfer, a move some dissenting officials suspected was a
concession to avoid embarrassing General Musharraf, who had
denied that any nuclear transfers ever occurred. 

A Congressional report on the Pakistan-North Korea trade
notes that over the years "Pakistan has been sanctioned in
what some observers deem, an `on again, off again'
fashion," mostly for importing technology for
unconventional weapons, and later for its 1998 nuclear
tests. Those sanctions, which were also issued against
India, were waived shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks, when the United States suddenly needed
Pakistan's cooperation. 

It is unclear whether the Pakistan-North Korea connection
has been cut off. But new evidence suggests that North
Korea is still racing ahead. In April, a ship carrying a
large cargo of superstrong aluminum tubing was stopped in
the Suez Canal after the German authorities determined that
it was destined for North Korea. The precise size of the
tubes, according to Western diplomats and industry reports,
suggested that they were intended for making the outer
casings of G-2 centrifuges, the kind whose rotors are made
of steel, and that Dr. Khan wrote about. 

The C.I.A. estimates that by 2005, if unchecked, North
Korea will begin large-scale production of enriched
uranium. 

But so far, American intelligence agencies say they are
uncertain where North Korea's centrifuge operations are. On
Friday, North Korea said it would allow a delegation of
American experts into the country this week. 

Halting Nuclear Trades 

Early in 2003, Mr. Bush
established a coordinating group inside the White House to
oversee the interception of shipments of unconventional
weapons around the world. So far, Washington has drawn more
than a dozen nations into a loose posse to track and stop
shipments, and Germany, Italy, Taiwan and Japan have
executed seizures. 

But the first interceptions - and the trail of parts and
agreements they reveal - have only pointed to the
mushrooming size of the secondary market in parts. 

Even more worrisome are the kinds of exchanges that do not
move on ships and planes, what Ashton B. Carter, who worked
in the Clinton administration on North Korean issues, calls
"substantial technical cooperation among all members of the
brotherhood of rogues." 

North Korean engineers have been sighted living in Iran,
ostensibly to help the country build medium- and long-range
missiles. But the growing suspicion is that the
relationship has now expanded beyond missiles, and that the
two nations are warily dealing in the nuclear arena as
well. 

"We're debating the evidence," said one administration
official. 

The latest nuclear disclosures came after the United States
spotted a German-registered ship headed for Libya through
the Suez Canal, with thousands of parts for uranium
centrifuges. The interception in October of that shipment,
American officials say, tipped the balance for the Libyan
leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, forcing him to agree in
December to disclose and dismantle his own nuclear program.


Inspectors are still investigating where Libya's components
came from, focusing on manufacturers in Europe and what Dr.
ElBaradei calls "interconnections" between the Libyan
program and Iran's. 

The intercepted shipment came from Dubai, a place of great
importance in Dr. Khan's secretive world. It was a Dubai
middleman claiming to represent Dr. Khan who in 1990, on
the eve of the Persian Gulf war, offered Dr. Khan's aid to
Iraq in building an atom bomb. And it was a Dubai middleman
whom Dr. Khan blamed for supplying centrifuge parts to
Iran, said a European confidante of Dr. Khan's who spoke on
the condition of anonymity. 

Ties between Libya and Pakistan go back years. In 1973,
when Pakistan was just starting its nuclear program, Libya
signed a deal to help finance its atomic efforts in
exchange for knowledge about how to make nuclear fuel, said
Leonard S. Spector of the Monterey Institute of
International Studies' Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
>From 1978 to 1980, he added, Libya appears to have supplied
Pakistan with uranium ore. But Libya appears to have made
much less progress than the Iranians had. 

Dr. ElBaradei estimates that 35 to 40 nations now have the
knowledge to build an atomic weapon. In place of the
nonproliferation treaty, which he calls obsolete, he
proposes revising the world's system to place any
facilities that can manufacture fissile material under
multinational control. 

"Unless you are able to control the actual acquisition of
weapon-usable material, you are not able to control
proliferation," he said in recent interview. But Mr. Bush
and the leaders of the other established nuclear states are
reluctant to renegotiate a stronger treaty because it will
reopen the question of why some states are permitted to
hold nuclear weapons and others are not. 

For now the world is left watching a terrifying race - one
that pits scientists, middlemen and extremists against
Western powers trying to intercept, shipload by shipload,
the technology as it spreads through the clandestine
network. Mr. Bush remains wary of cracking down on a
fragile Pakistan, for fear pressure could tip the situation
toward the radicals. 

Some in the administration say they think other nations may
follow Libya's calculations and abandon their programs
voluntarily. But there are doubters. 

"Its a fine theory," a top nonproliferation strategist in
the administration said recently. "The question for 2004 is
whether the mullahs or Kim Jong Il buy into it." 

David Rohde contributed reporting from Pakistan for this
article. 

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company