472NOT08.txt 8 September 96 Bureaucratic Politics Bureaucratic Politics Approaches Are A Fifth Wave Type Of Explanations. How? First, Consider Three Types Of Questions That Assume Rational Action By A Purposeful, Unitary Actor Acting In Its Perceived National Interest: "Why Did Iraq Invade Kuwait In Aug. 90?" Demands An Explanation. "Will Iran Take Advantage Of Civil War In Iraq To Invade?" Demands A Prediction. "How Can The Clinton Administration Persuade Or Deter Iran From Invading Iraq?" Requires A Plan. Explanation, Prediction, Planning Can Be Accomplished By Assuming A Purposive Unitary Actor Acting In Its National Interests. Find Out The Interests, Goals, Calculation Of Consequences Of Alternatives In Terms Of Costs And Risks Of Each To Explain, Predict, And Plan. What Were Saddam's Goals, Expectations, Hopes, Fears, And Propensity Towards Risk As A Basis For Explanation, Prediction, And Planning. Try To Marry American Options To Saddam's Assessment Of His Goals, Alternatives, Consequences, And Choices To Explain, Predict, And Plan According To Rational Assumptions. But A Bureaucratic Politics Approach Relaxes Assumption Of A Unified Government With A Single Overarching Interest. A Bureaucratic Politics Approach Includes An Assumption Of Government As A Series Of Bargaining Games Of Players In Position. They Compete Over How To Define The National Interest. They Seek To Maximize Organizational And Personal Interests. In A Bureaucratic Politics Approach, Players See Different Faces Of Issues, Propose Competing Ways To Resolve Value Conflicts, And Have Varying Time Horizons For Action Success. For Example, Explain Saddam's Invasion From Bureaucratic Perspective, Predict Whether Iran Will Invade Iraq Undergoing Civil War, And Plan For An American Effort To Persuade Or Deter Iraq And Iran From Bureaucratic Politics. Unitary Actor Perspective Useful When National Security Dominates Threat Perception. Lack Of Shared Values Facilitate The Use Of Bureaucratic Politics Explanations. A Bureaucratic Politics Approach Assumes That Actor A Can Change Actor B Only If A Sends A Clear, Consistent, Simple Signal, Some Officials In B Want To Change In The Desired Way, A's Signal Enhances Their Power. See RTs Who's At The Helm? Boulder: Westview Press, 1990. The Helm Book Finds That A: Lack Of Consensus On The National Security Interests At Stake Suggested A Bureaucratic Rather Than A Unitary Actor Approach. Availability Of Information Within A Black Box Offered An Occasion For A Bureaucratic Politics Explanation. Different Perceptions Of Threat Allowed Officials To Use Intelligence As A Tool For Bureaucratic Warfare Rather Than As A Method Of Information Gathering In A Unitary Actor Explanation.