An Analysis of Graduate Level Courses on Institutional
Change or Transformation in Higher Education

Prepared by

Sandy Tarbox, Research Assistant

Higher Education Transformation Workgroup
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education
University of Michigan

For

The Kellogg Forum on Higher Education Transformation

June 2001

Marvin W. Peterson, Research Director

 

 

Overview


Purpose of Study
top

Since the original survey and synthesis on Graduate Level Courses on Institutional Change and Transformation in Higher Education (1999) was undertaken in March of that year, a group of faculty specifically interested in the topic has organized under an initiative sponsored by the Kellogg Forum on Higher Education Transformation. The Faculty Network on Institutional Change and Transformation first convened in the Fall of 1999 at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. A List-serve, dedicated to this group has been created, and members meet and correspond about interests and ideas related to the study of Change and Transformation. Additionally, the Higher Education Transformation Work Group at the University of Michigan produced an Annotated Bibliography on Change and Transformation (1999). This Bibliography is currently being updated as well, as the literature and interest in the area of Change and Transformation in Higher Education (2001) has grown.

Since the early 1990s, Higher Education has experienced a number of “revolutionary challenges” (p.xix, Peterson, Dill and Mets, 1997) that make the topic of change and transformation even more relevant. Intensified competition from other education providers, calls for additional accountability in the face of increasing college costs, increased government regulation, rapid changes in educational technology and delivery, new markets for postsecondary education, globalization and an increasingly diverse population all make it necessary for educational institutions to be able to respond, adapt and change.

This survey looks at some of the ways in which faculty in the field of Higher Education have answered the challenge by incorporating the study of change into their courses offerings, and in some cases, creating courses that are specifically focused on change and transformation as a central theme.

Methodology
top

The ASHE membership directory was used to identify institutions that had programs in higher education. In addition to requesting syllabi and course descriptions from the twenty-nine current members of the Faculty Network, a survey was sent to 153 universities with Higher Education programs identified from the ASHE list. Faculty members at these institutions were also invited to join the Faculty Network. A total of twenty-two syllabi were received from faculty members for analysis. In addition, a web search of the institutions that did not respond to the survey was completed, in an attempt to identify graduate level courses related to Higher Education Change and Transformation. Five additional courses or programs related to change and transformation were identified through the web search.

The web search turned up several interesting facts. Many graduate education programs offer courses in studies of higher education organization, administration and governance, but do not necessarily identify change/transformation as a specific topic within the course. From a review of the syllabi that were received, it appears obvious that some of these courses may include change as a related topic, but not clearly delineate this in the information on the web. Obtaining actual syllabi from the web pages was practically impossible - only one complete syllabus was obtained in this manner. Faculty interested in sharing information on course development may want to begin making this kind of information more readily available via links from their School of Education page, or course description page, since researchers attempting to gather information such as this may not be able to link it to a specific faculty member’s name or a faculty member’s personal web page.

Categories of Analysis
top

The twenty-two syllabi received were analyzed for information related to higher education change and transformation. As the goals of the analysis of were to identify the types of change and transformation courses, course objectives, the topics or content covered, and the books used by the faculty in a way that would be useful to other faculty interested in the same area of change/transformation, the following information was collected and entered into a database for content analysis:

  • The name of the university offering the course
  • The course title
  • The name of the faculty member teaching the course
  • Whether the course was comprehensive(devoted in entirety to the subject of change/transformation) or partial (only devoted in part to the topic)
  • Whether the course was specific to higher education (or included K-12 or corporate/private business sector references)
  • What content topics or areas were addressed in the course
  • What resources (major texts) were used in the study of change
  • What the goals and objectives of the course were
This information is summarized in Appendix A for comprehensive courses, and Appendix B for partial courses.

A Synthesis

Types of Courses: Comprehensiveness and Specificity
top

Of the twenty-two syllabi received, twelve of the courses were comprehensive - devoted to the topic of change/transformation. Ten of the courses were identified as “partial” - having a section devoted to the topic of change/transformation. (See Table A.) Fourteen were specific to the field of Higher Education, while 8 were broader in scope - including the study of change/transformation in primary and/or secondary education and in other business and organization settings.

Table A. Courses by type
Comprehensive Partial
Higher Education Specific 4 10 14
Broader 8 8
12 10 22

Course Goals
top

The wide variety and focus of the courses offered create a broad spectrum of goals and objectives. In general, the partial courses (See Appendix B) have broader course objectives and goals that center around acquiring knowledge in the areas of higher education systems and structures, the organization and administration of higher education (with a particular emphasis on leadership and decision-making) and organizational theory and behavior. The comprehensive courses cover a wide array of goals and objectives, but some central themes emerge. (See Appendix A). The comprehensive courses emphasize knowledge of existing theories of change, various change models and strategies currently being used, leadership (managing and leading a change event), the exploration and development of frameworks with which to analyze change processes, and the intersection of theory and practice within the context of educational institutions and other organizations.

Topics Covered
top

In general, the twelve courses that were comprehensive had more extensive data on the topics covered in the course. A review of all twenty-two syllabi produced a list of thirteen discrete topics related to change and/or transformation, and a fourteenth topic which encompasses change and transformation in general. The syllabi were reviewed to determine which type of course (Comprehensive, Partial, Higher Education Specific and Broader) covered which topic. Table B summarizes this information:

Table B. Topics Covered by Course Type

Topic Course Type
Comprehensive
(12)
Partial
(10)
Higher Education
Specific
(14)
Broader
(8)
Leadership/Vision 10 9 13 6
Theory 7 7 10 4
Management 6 6 8 4
Organizational
Behavior/Systems
8 8 10 6
Collaboration/Teamwork 1 1
Strategies/Models 9 5 7 7
Planning/Facilitating Change 8 3 5
Organizational Culture 3 3 5 1
Environmental/External
Influences
7 3 7 3
Resistance to
Change/Conflict
4 2 2
Assessment 2 1 1
The Learning Organization 3 2 1
Restructuring/Reorganizing 6 1 5
Change and Transformation 10 5 9 6

By far, the most common specific area of focus in change/transformation was the study of Leadership/Vision and change. This theme was common in ten of the twelve institutions that offered a comprehensive course in the study of change, and nine that offered it as a part of a broader course. This was followed closely by focus on Theory, Management, Organizational Behavior/Systems and Strategies/Models. Many courses included broad introductions to the subject of change and transformation in general - ten of the comprehensive courses and 5 of the partial courses.

Texts Resources Used
top

A review of the primary texts used for each of the twenty-two courses (see Appendices A and B) indicates that some texts are used in multiple courses. Seven texts showed up more than once as a primary source in the surveyed courses. Table C summarizes the most commonly used texts in the surveyed courses. A complete listing of all primary texts and reference books used in the twenty-two courses, with full citations, can be found in Appendix C.

Table C. Most Commonly Used Texts in Surveyed Courses

Required/Primary Text Number of Times Cited
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work. SF: Jossey Bass 6
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1997). Reframing Organizations. SF: Jossey-Bass 6
Brown, II., C.M. (2000). Organization and Governance in Higher Education. ASHE Reader Series. Boston: Pearson 3
Fullan, M. (1999). Change Forces: The Sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer Press 2
Leslie, D. and Fretwell, D. (1996). Wise Moves in Hard Times. SF: Jossey-Bass 2
Morgan, G. (1986). Images or organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 2
Rowley, D.J., Lujan, H.D. and Dolence, M.C. (1997). Strategic change in colleges and universities: Planning to survive and prosper. SF: Jossey-Bass 2


A Synthesis of Change: Courses by Type
top

Comprehensive Change Courses - Higher Education Specific

Of the twelve courses identified as “comprehensive”, four are focused solely on higher education, while the remaining eight may include change/transformation in K-12 education, in the private or corporate sector or generically. Appendix A gives more detailed information on the name of the college offering the comprehensive change course, the name of the course, the faculty member teaching the course, whether the course is specific to higher education, and a brief description of the goals and objectives of each course.

Of the four courses dedicated to higher education, three identify themselves as “seminar” courses, and all use a variety of teaching approaches, projects and written assignments. Appalachian State’s “Seminar in Postsecondary Education” uses specific topics each week to guide the readings and discussion. The course is an “inquiry” into institutional change, and uses the following questions in focusing the readings:

  1. What are some of the most important issues facing higher education that call for significant institutional change?
  2. What changes, specifically, are needed?
  3. How does change typically come about?
  4. Why are institutions - including colleges and universities - so resistant to change?
  5. How might administrators, faculty members, and other educational leaders contribute to the change process?
  6. What is the role of models in guiding us to institutional change, and are there some that can be helpful to us?
  7. What can we learn from other fields, especially business and organizational development, which can be helpful to us?

Students are required to do a project on institutional change, a book analysis, a take-home final examination and participate regularly in class.

UCLA’s “Seminar on Transformational Efforts in Higher Education Institutions” seeks to “introduce and define the nature of change and transformation in higher education; investigate research models for change as well as practical change strategies; and review and refine theories regarding transformation in higher education” (Syllabus). The class uses not only discussion but presentations and guest speakers as well. Topics for weekly discussions include: External Forces, Organizational Culture, Leadership, Assessment, Theories of Change/Transformation, and Strategies of Change/Transformation. Each week’s topics are guided by questions to focus group discussion. Overarching guiding questions for the course include:

  1. What do we mean by transformation?
  2. Why do we transform (the value questions)?
  3. How does transformation get initiated and who are the initiators of transformational efforts?
  4. Are there universal understandings/elements of transformation across institutional types?
  5. What role does (should) the college or university president (and other positional leaders) play in the transformation process?
  6. What are the most common sources of resistance and why do they occur?
  7. When do you finally know when institutional transformation has taken place?

Each student in the class is required to do an article critique and to analyze and evaluate a current change effort in higher education as a class project.

Florida State University’s “Leading Change in Higher Education” seeks to “provide the fundamentals of change theory (concepts, principles and tools), a real world perspective on current problems and future opportunities in higher education and capacity-building for educational leaders and practitioners to understand and assist with the transition of higher education in the future” (Syllabus). Along with instructor presentations, the course uses guest speakers, experiential learning opportunities, a whole-class collaborative project, case studies, outside readings, homework problems, videos and a take-home final examination. The course outline includes the following topics:

  1. An American Imperative: Higher Expectations for Higher Education
  2. Change Theory
  3. Higher Education Cannot Escape History
  4. Troubled Times for American Higher Education
  5. Application of Change Theory Tools to Higher Education

The University of Michigan offers the course “Managing Change and Transformation in Higher Education” which “examines the nature of organizational change and transformation in higher educational institutions. The focus is on understanding how colleges and universities balance internal pressures and external forces for change in both their academic and administrative functions, how they develop and manage the change process and how they maintain or enhance institutional quality and viability while doing so. The objectives of the seminar allow for exploration of what is known and what is not known about institutional change and transformation, for developing a framework for understanding these processes, and for exploring the implications for guiding institutions in the future” (Syllabus). The seminar class is organized around major topics, and used readings from higher education and organizational studies. Discussion, special student presentations, guest presentations and case studies are used. Students are expected to complete a major paper (either individually or in a group) that may be on a transformation issue or topic, or a case study of an actual change. In addition, students prepare brief annotations of about 15 readings on institutional change and transformation.

Comprehensive Change Courses - Education Specific
top

Two courses in the survey are comprehensive (focused on change) in the field of education, although not specifically higher education. “Organizational Change in Education” at the University of South Carolina looks at theories and theorists which have impacted organizational change in education settings, various change models, the role of team learning and collaboration, and assumption and value orientations which characterize the change process. Besides daily readings and class discussions, students do written and oral reports based on change articles they have read, a major project that involves interviewing an organizational change leader, and a final exam.

“Planning and Educational Change” at Oklahoma State University looks at the “Organizational and environmental parameters, sources of change, barriers to change, and strategies for planning and implementing organizational change” (Syllabus,) and is designed for students from public schools and higher education institutions. The course emphasizes integration - blending personal experience with fields of knowledge together with theory and research-driven practice. Students are expected to understand the factors and processes of organizational change, and to formulate techniques for stimulating change in educational institutions. Students have required readings and book reviews, must complete an annotated bibliography of at least fifteen change related books, reports, articles or journal, have a final exam, and a major course project that focuses on planning, implementation and assessment of a change in an educational organization.

Comprehensive Change Courses - Organizational Studies and Education
top

The six remaining comprehensive courses study change/transformation in education, the business/private sector, or change generally. The course on “Planning and Change in Education” at the University of Northern Colorado, actually examines the change process in business and policy arenas, as well as schools and colleges. The focus is on two dominant paradigms - the Diffusion of Innovation Perspective, and the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. Students are expected to become familiar with these approaches and to apply them to case examples and ongoing activities.

Arkansas State University’s “Organization Development in Education” relies heavily on the use of online resources through “Blackboard”. The four themes used in the course - self, leadership, organizations and the change process - are integrated by students who use them to attempt to create their own personal plan (values, beliefs, strategies, principles, concepts, skills) for creating change in organizations. Although offered through the Department of Educational Leadership and Center for Excellence in Education, the course resources do not focus solely on education, but on broader themes of change strategies, leadership, the role of managers and facilitators, resistance to change and improving organizations.

“The Social Change Model of Leadership Development” at Portland State University examines “emerging conceptualizations and forms of leadership and leadership development” (Syllabus), with particular attention paid to their application in education and social service organizations. The models used place value on individual diversity and collaborative relationships that facilitate collective action in affecting positive change. Each student in the class selects a leadership concept based on the Social Change Model and gives an oral presentation. Students also do an individual analysis of their own leadership skills, and have a mid-term and final exam.

At Pepperdine University, “Transforming Organizations in a Global Community” presents a broad overview of organizational change theories, strategic planning and “visioning”. The course is a foundation course for the study and practice of planning and implementing change. Students keep a “reflective journal” which provides a summary of the main ideas or concepts from the weeks’ readings, interview a “change agent” of their choosing and presenting a brief oral summary of that interview as well as a written report, write two additional reports centered on assigned readings, and develop a change creation plan as part of a team of four students.

The course description for the “Advanced Seminar in Organizational Change” at the University of Vermont states that the course “contains six modules or segments in which to understand and exert leadership as a change agent within organizations. The modules are the new science, orthodox approaches to organizational theory, non-orthodox approaches, leadership, change and multicultural organizational development. Students are assigned an experiential component project within each of the six modules, must facilitate at least class discussion, and do one research paper or student-initiated creative project.

Professor Gaynor’s course (listed as SED AP 662) focuses on teaching a comprehensive planning method that involves designing project activities. The course is designed as a workshop to learn a set of planning techniques and then apply those techniques in the design of a project or program of the student’s own choosing. While students use a common text, class time is mainly devoted to clarifying and illustrating concepts and applications found in the text, and to work on individual projects.

Partial Courses
top

Ten universities offer courses that deal with the topic of change as part of a course that is broader in scope. All nine of the courses are specific to higher education - particularly the organization, administration and governance of higher education. The study of leadership, administration and management is the main theme covered in most of the classes, while organizational models and structures, and organizational behavior are also recurring themes. The most common texts used in these courses include Bolman and Deal’s 1997 book, “Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership” (a total of four of the nine partial courses site this book as a resource) and Robert Birnbaum’s 1988 book, “How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership” used in five of the nine partial courses. Appendix B summarizes information for the ten courses devoted in part to change, but entirely to the study of higher education.

Other Graduate Courses
top

The web search came up with five courses or programs that may revolve around the topic of change and transformation, that bear further investigation. The University of Maine at Orono offers an Ed. D. in Higher Education Leadership, focusing on Leadership for Change. Boston College offers a course in “Educational Change” that focuses on the study of change theories and approaches, their application in educational reform, and their impact on teaching and learning. The course examines the history of educational change and considers the forces for and against change in schools and other organizations. The University of Alabama offers a course in “Power, Politics and Change in Higher Education Systems” - a study of higher education institutions as complex organizations within a framework of local, state, and federal domains. Attention is focused on the institution as dynamic political entity that continually undergoes change. State-level coordination and systems behavior are also examined. Pennsylvania State University offers a Special Topics Course (topic changes from term to term) but has in the past included Organizational Change as one topic, and the University of Pennsylvania offers a course titled “Strategic Planning in Higher Education” that studies the successful techniques and special difficulties of institutional change and development of strategic priorities for action.

Conclusion
top

The topic of higher education change and transformation continues to increase in importance to colleges and universities across the country. One result of this most recent survey of graduate courses in change and transformation was the addition of eight new members to the Faculty Network on Institutional Change and Transformation in Higher Education - five of whom submitted syllabi for review, and three who have an interest in pursuing this topic. Traditional survey courses on higher education governance and administration (the ten partial courses reviewed in this analysis) are including the study of change together with the more traditional subjects of governance and administration. While many of the courses surveyed continue to use texts and reference books from outside the field of higher education, a substantial number of recommended reading materials are now focusing particularly on change within the field. Numerous journal articles, chapters in books and monographs on change and transformation in higher education were included in the syllabi to supplement the main texts and reference books. The number of comprehensive courses (those devoted to the topic of change and transformation) has increased from seven to twelve. The web search found five courses that appear to be focused on change and transformation (syllabi were not received for these at point of completion of this project) and a number of courses that appeared similar in title and description to the “Partial” courses reviewed in this analysis may also incorporate the study of change and transformation, as those listed here have done. Clearly the topic of change and transformation remains critical to students and faculty in higher education, and it is hoped that this analysis will be of use to those interested in pursuing the study of this issue.

 

Appendix A: Comprehensive Courses in Change/Transformation
top

Institution Course Title Faculty Higher Education Specific? Change Related TopicsCovered Primary Text Resources Used in Course Goals/Objectives
University of South Carolina Organizational Change in Education Susan L Schramm No Moral Leadership

Leadership, Management
& Org. Behavior

Leadership for Change

Collaboration

Understanding Educational Change

Ed. Change at the Local, Regional & National Levels

Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces; The sequel.

Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change.

Jossey-Bass’ reader on educational leadership. (2000).

Explore organizational change in an educational setting
Gain knowledge of various theories and theorists
Understand assumptions and value orientations which characterize change processes
Identify strengths and weaknesses of change models
Team learning and collaboration in change
Develop a platform of beliefs about organizational change in educational settings
University of Northern Colorado Planning and Change in Education Edward P. Caffarella No The Diffusion Perspective

Innovation: Stages of Concern, Levels of Use, Configuration,
Attributes, Creating & Consequences

Opinion Leadership/Change Agents

Organization as Context

Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process.

Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. (4th ed)

Examine change processes in schools, colleges, businesses and policy arenas.
Study recent theory, research, policy and practices

Develop knowledge-based principles
Two major paradigms used in course: Diffusion of Innovation Perspective
and the Concerns-Based Adoption Model

Portland State University Social Change Model of Leadership Development Christine Cress No Theoretical Perspectives

Nonhierarchical Models

Organizational and Social Change

A social change model of leadership development. (1996).
Higher Education Research Institute - UCLA, Los Angeles
Focus on creating organizational and social change utilizing
non-hierarchical models of leadership.

Survey Major Research and Theoretical perspectives on leadership

Examine the relationship between leadership and change

Appalachian State University Seminar in Post-secondary Education Chuck Claxton Yes Important Issues Facing Higher Education

What Specific Changes are Needed

How Change Comes About

Resistance to Change

Contributing to the Change Process - The Role of Faculty and Ed. Leaders

Role of Models

Learning from Other Fields

Lucas, A.F. & Assoc. (2000). Leading academic change:
Essential roles for department chairs.

Palmer, P.J. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening for the voice of vocation.

Examine institutional change from four perspectives:

Departmental Leadership

Teaching and Learning

Adult Development

The Learning Organization

University of California Los Angeles A Seminar on Transformational Efforts in Higher Education Institutions Alexander and Helen Astin Yes External Forces

Organizational Culture

Leadership

Assessment

Theories of Change/ Transformation

Strategies of Change/ Transformation

Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails.

Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. (2nd Ed.)

Astin. A.W., and Astin, H.S. (Eds.) 2000. Leadership reconsidered:
Engaging higher education in social change.

Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1991). Reframing Organizations:
Artistry Choice and Leadership.

Astin, A.W. (1991). Assessment for excellence.

Rowley, D.J., Lujan, H.D. and Dolence, M.C. (1997). Strategic change
in colleges and universities: Planning to survive and prosper.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.

Introduce and define the nature of change and transformation in higher education

Investigate various models for change as well as practical change strategies

Review and refine theories regarding transformation

Florida State University Leading Change in Higher Education Dale Lick Yes Expectations for Higher Education

Change Theory

History

Challenges to Higher Education

Application of Change Theory Tools

Conner, D.R. (1993). Managing at the speed of change.

Johnson Foundation (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education.

Kerr, C. (1994). Troubled times for higher education: The 1990s and beyond.

Kerr, C. (1994). Higher education cannot escape history: Issues for the 21st Century.

Develop in-depth understanding of change

Understand fundamentals of change theory, concepts, principles and tools

Gain capacity to plan, manage, and lead a major change transition in higher education.

Arkansas State University Organiza-tion Develop-ment in Education David W. Cox No Leadership Models

Open Space Background

Polarity Management

Terms of Engagement

Schools that Learn

Managers as Facilitators

Change

Systems

Johnson, B. (1996). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems.

Owen, H. (1997). Expanding our now: The story of open space technology.

Integrate four themes of self, leadership, organizations and the change process

Focus Question: What are the organizational change strategies and principles you
plan to use in the years ahead to guide change efforts in your organization?

University of Michigan Managing Change and Transformation in Higher Education Institutions Marvin Peterson Yes Nature of Organizational Change/Transformation
<

Theories, Models, Strategies and Approaches to Change

Organization/Environment

Institutional Strategies

Vision/Mission

Planning/Planned Change

Technology and Change

Restructuring and Reorganizing

Role of Leadership

Institutional Culture

Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities:
Organizational Pathways of Transformation

Peterson, M.W. , Dill, D.D., and Mets, L.A. (Eds.) (1997).
Planning and management for a changing environment.

Examine the various theories, models, strategies and approaches to
change and transformation in higher education
Develop a framework for understanding how these processes can guide
transformation efforts that improve an institution’s educational and managerial capacity
Develop skill in applying these models and concepts to analyze and guide
complex institutional change and transformation dynamics.
Pepperdine Tranforming Organizations in a Global Community Doug Leigh No Organizational Innovation

Change Management and Change Creation

Organizational Change Leadership

Methods of Assessment and Measuring Performance

Vision and Strategy

Developing Motivation and Commitment to Goals

Bridges. W., (1991). Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change.

Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference.

Maynard, H. and Mehrtens, S. (1996). The fourth wave: Business in the 21st century.

Peters, T. (1999). The circle of innovation.

Understand organizational change and visioning strategies, futurist literature, and
major global trends in a variety of organizational settings

Knowledge of methods used by effective leaders in direction-setting, decision-making,
implementing, evaluating and continuously improving during transformational change initiatives.

Oklahoma State University Planning and Educational Change Adrienne Hyle No (K-12 also included) Paradox of Organizations

Mapping School Change

Change Forces

Culture and the Problem of Change

Ainscow, M., Hargreaves, D.H., Balshaw, D and Black-Hawkins, M. (1994).
Mapping change in schools: The Cambridge manual of research techniques (1st ed.)

Fullan, M (1999). Change forces: The sequel.

Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting “the culture of the school
and the problem of change”.

Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C. , Ross, R., Roth, G. & Smith, B. (1999)
The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations.

Rowley, D.J., Lujan, H.D. and Dolence, M.C. (1997). Strategic change in
colleges and universities: Planning to survive and prosper.

Dolence, M.C., Rowley, D.J. and Lujan, H.D. (1997). Working toward
strategic change: A step by step guide to the planning process.

Use data collection techniques which foster an understanding of
faculty or student perceptions of the change process.

Read and reflect upon planned change in educational organizations.

Develop skills to specify and describe the context of change in
educational organizations.

Specify and describe the components of the change process.

Outline a set of strategies in response to a specific improvement
needed in the school environment.

Boston University SED AP 662
(Planning Methods)
Alan Gaynor No Flow Charting

Pert Diagramming
Gantt Diagrmming

InformationCo-Flow

Proposal Writing

Gaynor, A. and Evanson, J. ( ).
Project planning: A guide for practitioners
To teach a comprehensive planning method
that involves designing project activities.
University of Vermont Advanced Seminar in Organizational Change Kathleen Manning No New Science Approaches to Organization:
Quantum Approaches to Leadership and Management

Orthodox Organizational Approaches:
Structural Frame and Human Resources Frame
Political Frame and Symbolic Frame

Non-orthodox/Non Bureaucratic Organizational Approaches:
Web Model

Leadership Models and Organizational Theory

Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1991). Reframing Organizations:
Artistry Choice and Leadership.

Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion:
A new architecture for building great organizations.

Morrison, A. (1992) The new leaders: Guidelines on
leadership diversity in America.

Rost, J. (1997) Leadership for the 21st Century.

Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the corporate brain: Using the
new science to rethink how we structure and lead organizations.

Perceive how organizational theory can assist
administrators to effect change

Explore intersections of organizational theory, leadership and change

Understand different models and theories of organizations

Consider management implications in change within organizations

Place understanding of organizations and leadership within a
context of a diverse society

Comprehend organizational theory at a paradigmatic level

 

Appendix B. Courses Devoted in Part to Change/Transformation
top


Institution Course Title Faculty Higher Ed. Specific? Change Related Topics Covered Primary Texts Goals/Objectives
University of California, Los Angeles Organizations and Systems of Higher Education Mitchell Chang Yes College Students and Change

Student Consumerism and Educational Change

Culture

Bender and Schorske (1997).American Academic Culture in Transformation

Riesman, D. (1980).On Higher Education

Understand the scope, complexity and diversity of higher ed. systems, institutions and constituencies.

Historical overview of U.S. Higher education

Landmark and emerging issues in higher education

American Council on Education Organization and Administration of Higher Education Peter Eckel Yes Leading Change Brown, II (2000). Organization and Governance in Higher Education

Bolman and Deal (1997). Reframing Organizations

Introduction to Higher Education Organization and Administration.

Organizational Behavior

Management and Leadership

George Washington University Organizational Theory Adrianna Kezar Yes Colleges and Universities as large, complex systems Birnbaum (1988). How Colleges Work

Bolman and Deal (1997) Reframing Organizations

Clark ( 1983)
The Higher Education System

Leslie, D. and Fretwell,, D. (1996).
Wise Moves in Hard Times

Martin, (1992)
Cultures in Organizations

Morgan (1986) Images of Organizations

Organizational Analysis for Leadership,
Decision Making and Governance

Organizational Theory

SUNY - University at Buffalo Organization and Governance in Higher Education D. Bruce Johnstone Yes Theories and Models used to Analyze Institutions

Decision Making

Leadership

Brown II, C. (2000). Organization and Governance
in Higher Education Boston: Pearson Publishing
Understanding of organizational, Governance and Administrative Characteristics of Colleges and Universities
Florida State University Organization and Administration of Higher Education Dale W. Lick Yes Transactional and Transformational Leadership

Change Management

Dramatic and Dynamic Nature of Change

Birnbaum (1988). How Colleges Work Analyze major organizational and administrative elements that define colleges and universities.
University of Maryland Organization and Administration of Higher Education Frank Schmidtlein Yes Concepts and Theories of Change

Organizational Culture

Organizational Models

Role of Leader

Birnbaum (1988). How Colleges Work Reframing

Peterson, M., Ed. (1991)
ASHE Reader in Organization and Governance in Higher Education

Walker, D.E. (1984) The Effective Administrator

Review of Literature in the Field

Basic Concepts, Terminology of Organizational Behavior

Role of Administrator

Concepts/Theories of Change

Iowa State University Organization and Administration of Higher Education John Schuh Yes Leadership

Models/Theories

Culture

Organization and Governance in Higher Education (Brown, C.M. 2000) General Overview of Administration of Higher Education
Eastern Illinois University Leadership and Administration in Higher Education Charles Eberly Yes Leadership and Leadership Theories

Management

How Colleges Work (Birnbaum, 1988).

The Leadership Challenge (Kouzes and Posner, 1995).

Course Focuses on Student Personnel and Leadership Strategies
Michigan State University Administration and Governance of Higher Education Kathryn Moore Yes Administration and Governance

Leadership

Management

Reframing Organizations (Bolman and Deal, 1997).

Wise Moves in Hard Times (Leslie and Fretwell, 1996)

Images of Organizations (Morgan, G. 1986).

The Art of Systems Thinking (O’Connor and McDermott, 1997)

Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (Scott, 1992)

Theory of Governance and Leadership

Understanding Colleges and Universities as Complex Organizations

 

Appendix C - Citations for Required/Primary Texts Used in Twenty-two Surveyed Courses
top

A social change model of leadership development. (1996). Higher Education Research Institute - UCLA

Ainscow, M., Hargreaves, D.H., Balshaw, D and Black-Hawkins, M. (1994). Mapping change in schools: The Cambridge manual of research techniques (1st ed.) Cambridge: UK

Astin, A.W. (1991). Assessment for excellence. SF: Jossey Bass

Astin. A.W., and Astin, H.S. (Eds.) 2000. Leadership reconsidered: Engaging higher education in social change. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Bender and Schorske (1997) American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work. SF: Jossey-Bass

Birnbaum, R. (2000) Management Fads in Higher Education SF: Jossey-Bass

Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T. E. (1997).Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. SF: Jossey-Bass.

Bridges. W., (1991). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley

Brown II, C.M. (2000) Organization and governance in higher education. ASHE Reader Series. Boston: Pearson

Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. CA: Berkeley Press

Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. NY: Pergamon Press

Conner, D.R. (1993). Managing at the speed of change. New York: Villard

Dolence, M.C., Rowley, D.J. and Lujan, H.D. (1997). Working toward strategic change: A step by step guide to the planning process. SF: Jossey Bass.

Fullan, M (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer Press

Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press

Gaynor, A. and Evanson, J. (1992). Project planning: A guide for practitioners. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: SUNY Press

Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion: A new architecture for building great organizations. NY: Doubleday

Johnson Foundation (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education.

Johnson, B. (1996). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. Amherst, MA: HRD Press Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. (2000). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Kerr, C. (1994). Higher education cannot escape history: Issues for the 21st Century. Albany: SUNY Press

Kerr, C. (1994). Troubled times for higher education: The 1990s and beyond. Albany: SUNY Press

Kouzes, J. M. and Posner, B.Z. (1995) The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations.

Leslie, D. and Fretwell, D. (1996). Wise Moves in Hard Times. SF: Jossey-Bass

Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails. Albany: SUNY Press.

Lucas, A.F. & Assoc. (2000). Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs. SF: Jossey-Bass

Martin, J. (1992) Cultures in organizations. Oxford University Press

Maynard, H. and Mehrtens, S. (1996). The fourth wave: Business in the 21st century. SF: Barrett-Koehler

Morgan, G. (1986) Images of organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Morrison, A. (1992) The new leaders: Guidelines on leadership diversity in America. SF: Jossey-Bass

O’Connor, J. and McDermott, I. (1997) The art of systems thinking. Thorson Publishing

Owen, H. (1997). Expanding our now: The story of open space technology. SF: Berrett-Koehler

Palmer, P.J. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening for the voice of vocation. SF: Jossey-Bass.

Peters, T. (1999). The circle of innovation. NY: Vintage Books

Peterson, M.W. , Dill, D.D., and Mets, L.A. (Eds.) (1997). Planning and management for a changing environment. SF: Jossey-Bass

Peterson, M. et.al. (Eds.) (1991). ASHE Reader in Organization and Governance in Higher Education (4th edition). Ginn Press.

Riesman, D. (1980). On Higher Education: The academic enterprise in an era of rising student consumerism. SF: Jossey-Bass

Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. (4th ed) New York: Free Press

Rost, J. (1997) Leadership for the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Praeger

Rowley, D.J., Lujan, H.D. and Dolence, M.C. (1997). Strategic change in colleges and universities: Planning to survive and prosper. SF: Jossey-Bass.

Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting “the culture of the school and the problem of change”. NY: Teachers College Press

Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. (2nd Ed.) SF: Jossey-Bass

Scott, R.W. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. NY: Doubleday.

Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C. , Ross, R., Roth, G. & Smith, B. (1999) The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. NY: Currency Doubleday

Walker, D.E. (1984) The effective administrator. SF: Jossey-Bass.

Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the corporate brain: Using the new science to rethink how we structure and lead organizations. SF: Berrett Koehler

 

References
top

Peterson, M.W., McLendon, M.K, Anderson, A.,Tarbox, S. and Park, L. (2001). Change and transformation in higher education: An annotated bibliography (2nd Edition). Higher Education Transformation Workgroup, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor

Peterson, M.W., McLendon, M.K, Anderson, A. and Tarbox, S. (1999). Change and transformation in higher education: An annotated bibliography. Higher Education Transformation Workgroup, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor

Peterson, M.W., Anderson, A. and McLendon, M. (1999). Graduate level courses on institutional change or transformation in higher education. Kellogg Forum on Higher Education Transformation. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor

Peterson, M.W. , Dill, D.D., and Mets, L.A. (Eds.) (1997). Planning and management for a changing environment. SF: Jossey-Bass