RESOLVING SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITIES

 

1Tarquinius rex Delphos ad consulendum oraculum duos filios mittere statuit.

What is the syntactic function of the infinitive mittere?
Part of indirect statement
Complementary infinitive

2Tarquinius rex Delphos ad consulendum oraculum duos filios mittere statuit. Itaque Titus et Arruns profecti sunt; comes iis additus est L. Iunius Brutus, sorore regis natus.

What does iis refer to ?
filii Titus et Arruns
filii et Tarquinius
profecti sunt

3cupido incessit animos iuvenum quaerendi ad quem eorum regnum Romanum esset venturum.

Which word in the sentence helps you to decide what kind of pronoun quem is?
eorum
iuuvenum
quaerendi

4cupido incessit animos iuvenum quaerendi ad quem eorum regnum Romanum esset venturum.

Which word allows you to disambiguate regnum?
venturum
Romanum
Esset venturum

5Ex infimo specu vocem redditam dicunt

Which word allows you to identify redditam as an infinitive with gapped esse?
vocem
dicunt
specu

6'Imperium summum Romae habebit ille qui vestrum primus, o iuvenes, osculum matri tulerit'

Which word absolves the syntactic ambiguity from imperium?
ille
habebit
qui

7Brutus, ratus responsum dei aliud significare,

Which word helps you to identify the syntactic function of significare?
aliud
responsum
ratus

8terrae osculum dedit, quod ea communis mater omnium esset.

What helped you to decide whether quod is a relative pronoun or an adverbial causal clause marker?
quod does not have a suitable antecedent (head), so it must be an adverbial causal clause marker
quod does not have a function in its own clause, so it must be an adverbial causal clause marker
quod has a suitable antecedent (osculum), so it must be a relative pronoun.