**Archimedes,
A Gold Thief and Buoyancy**

by

Larry "Harris" Taylor, Ph.D.

*This is an electronic reprint and expansion of an article that appeared in SOURCES
(July/Aug. 1993, p. 27-30). This material is copyrighted and all rights retained
by the author. This article is made available as a service to the diving
community by the author and may be distributed for any non-commercial or
Not-For-Profit use. *

*All
rights reserved.*

**Go
To Site Page: Home
About "Harris"
Articles
War Stories
Biblios
Editorials
Links
Site Map
Fini**

Once upon a time (the 3 rd century B.C.)
there was a very wealthy king. Like most kings, Hiero of Syracuse (on the island
of modern day Sicily) wore a crown as a symbol of his authority. Over the years,
Hiero was made aware that his Royal Goldsmith (who made his crown from Hiero’s
treasury) was living a lifestyle that was beyond his means. Hiero suspected that
the Royal Goldsmith was using royal gold, intended for the royal crown, to
augment his personal wealth. The goldsmith was rumored to be preparing the
crowns with a cheaper alloy (using a silver-gold mix) than pure gold. No one
using 3 rd century B.C. technology knew how to prove or disprove the speculation
that the Royal Goldsmith was “stealing from the crown.”

The problem of determining the gold content
of the royal crown was given to Archimedes, a noted Greek mathematician and
natural philosopher. Needles to say, this was not a trivial problem! Archimedes
knew that silver was less dense than gold, but did not know any way of
determining the relative the density (mass/volume) of an irregularly shaped
crown, The weight could be determined using a balance or scale, but the only way
known to determine volume, using the geometry of the day, was to beat the crown
into a solid sphere or cube. Since Hiero had specified that damage to the crown
would be viewed with less than enthusiasm, Archimedes did not wish to risk the
king’s wrath by pounding the crown into a cube and hoping that post-analysis it
could be made all better again.

While in the public baths, Archimedes
observed that the level of water rose in the tub when he entered the bath. He
realized this was the solution to his problem and supposedly, in his excitement,
he leaped up and ran naked through the streets back to his laboratory screaming
“Eureka, Eureka!” (I’ve got it!).

Later, he demonstrated to Hiero and
his court how the amount of water overflowing a tub could be used to measure a
volume. His calculations indicated the goldsmith was, indeed, an embezzler.
History does not record the fate of the unscrupulous artisan.

Archimedes observation has been formalized
into Archimedes Principle:

“An object partially or wholly immersed in a
fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the
object.”

Translation: objects more dense than water
(like lead) will sink; objects less dense than water (like cork) will float;
objects of the same density will remain at the same level (hover) and neither
sink nor float. Objects that sink are frequently termed negatively buoyant.
Objects that float are termed positively buoyant. Objects that stay stationary
at depth are said to be neutrally buoyant.

Buoyancy is easiest understood by the
application of "force arrow" principles or vectors. Vectors are mathematical
constructs that have magnitude (like mass) and direction (towards or away from
the surface). Weight is a downward force (gravity acting on mass); buoyancy is
an upward force. If these two forces are balanced, then so-called neutral
buoyancy (object hovers) is achieved. If they are not balanced, the object
immersed will either sink (weight greater than upward buoyant force) or float
(weight less than upward buoyant force).

NOTE: As with weight and mass, divers
commonly are imprecise in the use of the term buoyancy. Rigorously, buoyancy is
defined as ONLY an upward force directed against the force of weight. Although
commonly used in the diving community, the terms "neutrally buoyant" and
"negatively buoyant" are rigorously improper; the term "positively buoyant" is
redundant. Buoyancy is much easier to understand if one only considers balancing
an upward force (buoyancy) and a downward force (weight). In this scheme, there
is no positive or negative. We will use the term "hover" to refer to the
so-called "neutrally buoyant" state. Thus, an object will float, hover or sink.
If weight is greater than buoyancy, the object sinks. If buoyancy is greater
than weight, the object rises. If weight and buoyancy are identical, then the
object hovers (“is weightless”)

EXAMPLE: When a helicopter "hovers."
(Remains stationary and neither rises or sinks) the helicopter has exactly
balanced the downward force of weight with the upward force of lift supplied by
the turning rotor. A diver "hovers" by balancing the downward force of weight
with the upward force of buoyancy.

For the diver, the force of buoyancy (yellow arrow, below) ALWAYS acts to move the diver (immersed object) towards the surface. Weight (red arrow, below) ALWAYS acts to move the diver (immersed object) towards the bottom. These forces are either balanced (identical) or unbalanced. If they are NOT balanced (the ideal "hovering" or weightless condition), then the diver MUST expend energy to maintain a horizontal steady state.

**Buoyancy Largest = Ascend**

**Forces Balanced = Hover**

**Weight Largest = Sink**

Most buoyancy issues (either solving buoyancy physics problems or in-water diving) can be understood by simply determining the relationship between forces acting either up or down.

Buoyancy-type problems involve three
factors: the weight of the object being submerged, the volume of the object
submerged, and the density of the liquid involved in the problem. Any two of
these factors can be used to determine the third. Let's study some
representative numeric examples.

**ENGLISH EXAMPLE**: What is the buoyancy in
seawater of a piece of wood that weighs 2000 pounds & measures 6 ft x 2 ft x
3 ft?

**ANSWER:** Determine forces involved:

a. The weight of wood = 2000 pounds

b. The volume of wood = 6 ft x 2 ft x 3 ft = 36
ft^{3}

c. The corresponding weight of an
equal volume of seawater

36
ft^{3} x 64 lb / ft^{3} = 2304 lb

At this point, we know that the wood object
weighs less than the corresponding volume of water (the volume of seawater that
would be displaced if the entire object were to be submerged), thus it will
float.

Applying "force arrows:"

The object will float with a buoyant force
of 304 pounds. In order to sink the object, the object would have to weigh more
than an additional 304 pounds (without changing volume.) This is the amount of
"push" you would have to exert on this log for it to sink. Although the object
is buoyant (i.e., there is a net force of 304 pounds pushing up on this log), it
will not be completely out of the water. The density of the log can then be used
to determine how much of the log will be submerged.

^{}

Since this log is less dense than seawater,
it will float. The amount of the volume that is submerged will be determined by
the ratio of the density of the log and the density of the seawater. In
general:

Ratio: Volume Submerged = Density Object /
Density Liquid

Substituting the value of this log &
seawater:

So, about 87% of the log's volume will be
submerged.** **

**ENGLISH EXAMPLE:** A fully suited diver weighs
200 pounds. This diver displaces a volume of 3.0 cubic feet of seawater. Will
the diver float or sink?

** ANSWER:** Determine forces
involved:

a. weight of equal volume of
seawater:

3.0 ft^{3} x 64 lb / ft^{3}. = 192 lb.

b. applying force arrows:

The diver will sink. This diver weighs 8
pounds in the water and is severely over-weighted. Removal of eight pounds will
allow the diver to hover (which means the diver will have to do less work while
diving; see the trim discussion.) Since the object of recreational diving is to
enjoy the environment, less work translates into more bottom time and more
fun!

**ENGLISH EXAMPLE**: A fully geared diver in a
wet suit weighs 210 pounds. In fresh water, this diver with a scuba cylinder
containing 500 psig needs 18 pounds of lead to hover. How much lead will this
diver need when diving in a wet suit in seawater?

**ANSWER:** Using Force Arrows:

To hover, the volume of water displaced by
the diver must exert a buoyant force upward equal the total weight of the diver
plus gear (downward force). This is the buoyant force exerted by a volume of
fresh water (density = 62.4 lb./cubic foot) that weighs 228 pounds.

Determine Volume of diver:

Density = Mass / Volume

Rearranging:

Volume = Mass / Density

Substituting:

Now that we know the volume of the diver, we
can determine (with the assumption the volume of the weight belt is negligible)
the buoyant force from the seawater (density 64 lb./ cubic foot) the diver would
displace:

3.65
ft^{3} x 64 lb / ft^{3} = 233.6 lb.

Applying force
arrows:

So, the diver that was comfortable with
eighteen pounds of lead on the weight belt in fresh water must add 6 more pounds
(for a total of 24 lb.) on the weight belt to dive in seawater.

**ENGLISH EXAMPLE**: A fully geared diver in a
wet suit weighs 210 pounds. In seawater, this diver needs 18 pounds of lead to
hover. How much lead will this diver need when diving in a wet suit in fresh
water? ** **

**ANSWER:** Using Force Arrows:

To hover, the volume of water displaced by
the diver must exert an upward buoyant force equal the total weight of the diver
plus gear (downward force). This is the upward buoyant force exerted by the
displaced volume of seawater (density = 64 lb./cubic foot) that weighs 228
pounds.

Determine Volume of diver: (Divers use
weight and mass as equivalent terms)

Density = Weight / Volume

Rearranging:

Volume = Weight / Density

Substituting:

^{
}

Now that we know the volume of the diver, we
can determine the upward buoyant force from fresh water (density 62.4 lb./ cubic
foot) the diver would displace:

3.56
ft^{3} x 62.4 lb / ft^{3}
= 222.1 lb.

Applying force arrows:

So, the diver that was comfortable with
eighteen pounds of lead on the weight belt in seawater must remove 6 pounds (for
a total of 12 lb.) from the weight belt to dive in fresh water. The difference
in density between fresh and seawater is the reason why different amounts of
weight must be used when diving in different environments. When moving from
fresh to seawater (with the same equipment configuration), divers must add
weight. When moving from seawater to less dense fresh water, divers should
remove weight. ** **

**METRIC EXAMPLE**: A log weighing 6000 kg
measures 1 m x 3 m x 2 m. Will this object sink or float in seawater (density =
1.0256 kg/l)? ** **

**ANSWER:** Determine volume of object:

Volume = 1 m x 3 m x
2 m = 6 m^{3 }

Convert cubic meters to
liters:

Determine weight of the displaced
water:

6,000 l x 1.0256 kg/ l = 6,154 kg

Using force arrows:

Now we know that this object will float

**METRIC EXAMPLE:** How much of the log will be
submerged?

**ANSWER**: Determine density of
object:

Density = Weight / Volume

The amount that will be submerged is
the ratio of densities:

So, about 98% of this object will be submerged in seawater.

**METRIC EXAMPLE**: A wet suited diver weighs 74
kg with gear. The diver has a volume of 80 l. How much lead should the diver
wear for diving in seawater (density = 1.026 kg/l)?

**ANSWER**: Determine weight of seawater
displaced:

80 l x 1.026 kg / l = 82.1 kg

Using force arrows:

Since there is a resultant buoyant force of
8 kg, the diver will have to wear 8 kg to compensate.

Divers wearing wet or dry suits have an
additional factor to consider. Within the wet suit are trapped bubbles of gas; a
dry suit diver has air spaces between the diver and the suit. This gas (in fact,
all air spaces) is subject to changes in volume as a result of changes in
pressure (See Boyle's Law). This means that as the diver moves up or down in the
water column, the volume of these gas spaces changes. This change in gas volume
affects the diver's buoyancy. As a diver descends, the volume of the gas
decreases. Thus, less water is displaced. The diver is less buoyant and sinks.
On ascent, the pressure on the diver decreases. The gas expands and occupies a
larger volume. This displaces more water and increases the buoyant (upward)
force.

Archimedes principle points out that if we
are not hovering, we MUST be either floating (moving up) or sinking. So, unless
our buoyancy and weight are equal, we must expend energy to hover in the water
column. However, if the buoyant force exactly matches the downward force
contributed by the weight of the object submerged, then a "weightless" state is
achieved. This is why NASA uses underwater training for its astronauts. By
finely tuning the buoyancy of a space-suited astronaut underwater, the
weightless environment of space can be simulated. This allows astronauts the
opportunity to practice (using the philosophy that "Perfect Practice and Prior
Planning Precedes Perfect Performance!) their mission on earth to insure success
in space.

The lift associated with air spaces can be
used to raise objects from the bottom. Since air weighs very little compared to
the weight of the displaced water, it can be assumed that the lifting capacity
is equal to the weight of the volume of water that is displaced by the air
volume of the lifting device.

**ENGLISH EXAMPLE**: You wish to lift a
300-pound anchor from the bottom of a lake bed. The bottom is hard and flat (so
no excess lift will be needed to overcome the suction associated with being
immersed in the bottom muck). You have access to 55 gal drums (weighing 20
pounds each) that have been fitted with over-expansion vents. How many 55 gal
drums will it take to lift the anchor?

**ANSWER:** Determine forces involved:

a. Determine weight of water
displaced:

Weight = Density x
Volume

Lake implies fresh water: density = 62.4
lbs/ft^{3 }

^{ }

Applying force arrows:

Since the object to be lifted weighs less
than the 440-pound lifting capacity of a 55 gal drum, a single 55 gallon drum
should be sufficient to lift the 300 pound anchor. In practice, large lifting
objects (like a 55 gal drum) have a large surface area and will generate
considerable drag (which decreases lifting capacity). Without getting
mathematically rigorous and calculating drag coefficients, a safe rule of thumb
is to assume about 0.75 of the calculated lifting capacity for the lifting
device in an actual lifting operation. ** **

**PROBLEM**: Which weighs more underwater: a
pound of lead or a pound of concrete?

**ANSWER:** Although both weigh the same on the
surface, lead will weigh more while totally submerged. Rationale: Lead is more
dense than concrete, thus an equal weight will displace less volume of water.
Lead will therefore have less buoyancy counteracting its weight and thus its
underwater weight will be greater.

** TRIM**

As a diver moves in the water column,
the diver is subject to a number of forces. In the vertical plane, gravity
(weight) tends to make the diver descend and buoyancy (from too little weight or
too much air in the b.c.d.) makes the diver ascend. In the horizontal plane, the
diver moves forward propelled by the force of the kick. The thrust, or forward
motion, must overcome drag (or friction) that the diver and equipment present to
the water. A good diver tries to adjust diving style to balance the forces
involved.

Part of the unique exhilaration of diving is
the ability to glide, weightless, under the surface of the water. It is the most
efficient and enjoyable way to dive. If the diver is over weighted (a too common
occurrence), then s/he must continually expend energy to overcome gravity and
remain at constant depth. If the diver is under weighted, s/he must also
continually expend energy in an attempt to overcome buoyancy with leg power. (In
battles with the forces of buoyancy and weight, these forces always overcome leg
power and fatigue is certain.) The way to maximize efficiency (decrease work
load and thus increase enjoyment) in the water is to balance weight and buoyancy
so that the thrust from the fins can be directed towards forward movement, not
towards overcoming buoyancy errors.

Assuming a horizontal position in the water can reduce drag. The more horizontal the diver, the less drag (resistance to movement caused by friction between the diver and the dense water environment) will occur and the easier underwater swimming will be! In general, cutting the cross-sectional area by a factor of two requires four times less energy to go the same distance. A more horizontal position presents a smaller area to the path of movement and thus lessens resistance.

**Bottom line:**

Understanding the interaction of the forces
of weight and buoyancy will help a diver achieve weightless diving. The concepts
associated with buoyancy control are a superb example of the Easy Diver’s
principle of “Dive with your brains, not your back!”

**Go
To Site Page: Home
About "Harris"
Articles
War Stories
Biblios
Editorials
Links
Site Map
Fini**

**Credit:**

Portions of this article were used in my chapter on Dive Physics appearing in:

Bove
and Davis' Diving Medicine (4 ^{th} Edition), published by Saunders
(Elsevier)

**About the author: **

Larry "Harris" Taylor, Ph.D. is a
biochemist and Diving Safety Coordinator at the University of Michigan. He has
authored more than 100 scuba related articles. His personal dive library (See
Alert Diver, Mar/Apr, 1997, p. 54) is considered one of the best recreational
sources of information In North America.

All rights reserved.

Use of these articles for personal or organizational profit is specifically denied.

These articles may be used for not-for-profit diving education