The ISBN number is 978-94-007-0294-3.
I would like to thank those who reported errors in the first edition and who made other suggestions for improvement. If you find any errors in this edition, please let me know at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can download my most recent list of errata at `Errata'.
A solution manual is available, containing detailed solutions to all the problems, in some cases involving further discussion of the material. Bona fide instructors should contact me at email@example.com if they need the manual and I will send it out as zipped .pdf files.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Most engineering students first encounter the subject of mechanics of materials in a course covering the concepts of stress and strain and the elementary theories of axial loading, torsion, bending and shear. There is broad agreement as to the content of such courses, there are many excellent textbooks and it is easy to motivate the students by using simple examples with obvious engineering relevance.
The second course in the subject presents considerably more challenge to the instructor. There is a very wide range of possible topics and different selections will be made (for example) by civil engineers and mechanical engineers. The concepts tend to be more subtle and the examples more complex making it harder to motivate the students, to whom the subject may appear merely as an intellectual excercise. Existing second level texts are frequently pitched at too high an intellectual level for students, many of whom will still have a rather imperfect grasp of the fundamental concepts.
Most undergraduate students are looking ahead to a career in industry, where they will use the methods of mechanics of materials in design. Many will get a foretaste of this process in a capstone design project and this provides an excellent vehicle for motivating the subject. In mechanical or aerospace engineering, the second course in mechanics of materials will often be an elective, taken predominantly by students with a design concentration. It is therefore essential to place emphasis on the way the material is used in design.
Mechanical design typically involves an initial conceptual stage during which many options are considered. During this phase, quick approximate analytical methods are crucial in determining which of the initial proposals are feasible. The ideal would be to get within plus or minus 30% with a few lines of calculation. The designer also needs to develop experience as to the kinds of features in the geometry or the loading that are most likely to lead to critical conditions. With this in mind, I try wherever possible to give a physical and even an intuitive interpretation to the problems under investigation. For example, students are encouraged to estimate the location of weak and strong bending axes and the resulting neutral axis of bending by eye and methods are discussed for getting good accuracy with a simple one degree of freedom Rayleigh-Ritz approximation. Students are also encouraged to develop a feeling for the mode of deformation of engineering components by performing simple experiments in their outside environment, for example, estimating the radius to which an initially straight bar can be bent without producing permanent deformation, or convincing themselves of the dramatic difference between torsional and bending stiffness for a thin-walled open beam section by trying to bend and then twist a structural steel beam by hand-applied loads at the ends.
In choosing dimensions for mechanical components, designers will expect to be guided by criteria of minimum weight, which with elementary calculations, often leads to a thin-walled structure as the optimal solution. This demands that students be introduced to the limits imposed by elastic instability. Some emphasis is also placed on the effect of manufacturing errors on such highly-designed structures --- for example, the effect of load misalignment on a beam with a large ratio between principal stiffnesses and the large magnification of initial alignment or loading errors in a column below, but not too far below the buckling load.
No modern text of mechanics on materials would be complete without a discussion of the finite element method. However, students and even some instructors are often confused as to the respective roles played by analytical and numerical methods in engineering practice. Numerical methods provide accurate solutions for complex practical problems, but the results are specific to the geometry and loading modelled and the solution involves a significant amount of programming effort. By contrast, analytical methods may be very idealized and hence approximate, but they are often quick to apply and they provide generality, permitting a whole family of designs to be compared or even optimized.
The traditional approach to mechanics is to define the basic concepts, derive a general theory and then illustrate its application in a variety of examples. As a student and later as a practising engineer, I have never felt comfortable with this approach, because it is impossible to understand the nuances of the definitions or the general treatment until after they are seen in examples which are simple enough for the mathematics and physics to be transparent. Over the years, I have therefore developed rather untraditional ways of proving and explaining things, relying heavily on simple examples during the derivation process and using only the bare minimum of specialist terminology. I try to avoid presenting to the student anything which he or she cannot reasonably be expected to understand fully now.
The problems provided at the end of each chapter range from routine applications of standard methods to more challenging problems. Particularly lengthy or challenging problems are identified by an asterisk. The Solution Manual to accompany this book is prepared to the same level of detail as the example problems in the text and in many cases introduces additional discussion. It is available to bona fide instructors on application to the author at firstname.lastname@example.org. Answers to even-numbered problems are provided in Appendix D.
This book evolved out of a set of notes that I wrote for a second-level course at the University of Michigan and the resulting interaction with my students and colleagues has played a crucial role in the development of my thinking about the subject. Special thanks go to Przemislaw Zagrodzki of Warsaw University of Technology and Raytech Composites Inc. for his invaluable help with the appendix on finite element methods. I also wish to thank the many people who have made suggestions for improvements and corrections to the first edition which I have incorporated wherever possible.
Back to J.R.Barber's homepage.