JOMfa1blu.gif (2406 bytes)

Mosberg

Lab Web

buttonAA.bmp (8838 bytes)button um.bmp (8838 bytes)buttonColPhar.bmp (8838 bytes)buttonMedChem.bmp (8838 bytes)

Home Up

  Abstracts

Recent publications

  1. A. Mansour, L.P. Taylor, J.L. Fine, R.C. Thompson, M.T. Hoversten, H.I. Mosberg, S.J. Watson, and H. Akil. Key residues defining the opioid receptor binding pocket: a site-directed mutagenesis study J. Neurochem., 68:344-353, 1997.
    Abstract.
    Structural elements of the rat m-opioid receptor important in ligand receptor binding and selectivity were examined using a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Five single amino acid mutations were made, three that altered conserved residues in the mu, delta, and kappa receptors (Asn150 to Ala, His297 to Ala, and Tyr326 to Phe) and two designed to test for m/d selectivity (Ile196 to Val and Val202 to Ile). Mutation of His297 in transmembrane domain 6 (TM6) resulted in no detectable binding with [3H]DAMGO (3H-labeled D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly-ol5-enkephalin), [3H]bremazocine, or [3H]ethylketocyclazocine. Mutation of Asn150 in TM3 produces a three- to 20-fold increase in affinity for the opioid agonists morphine, DAMGO, fentanyl, beta-endorphin1-31, JOM-13, deltorphin II, dynorphin1-13, and U50,488, with no change in the binding of antagonists such as naloxone, naltrexone, naltrindole, and nor-binaltorphamine. In contrast, the Tyr326 mutation in TM7 resulted in a decreased affinity for a wide spectrum of m, d and k agonists and antagonists. Altering Val202 to Ile in TM4 produced no change on ligand affinity, but Ile196 to Val resulted in a four- to fivefold decreased affinity for the m agonists morphine and DAMGO, with no change in the binding affinities of k and d ligands.
  2.  

  3. Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. Thermodynamic model of secondary structure for a-helical peptides and proteins. Biopolymers. 42(2):239-269, 1997
    Abstract.
    A thermodynamic model describing formation of a-helices by peptides and proteins in the absence of specific tertiary interactions has been developed. The model combines free energy terms defining a-helix stability in aqueous solution and terms describing immersion of every helix or fragment of coil into a micelle or a nonpolar droplet created by the rest of protein to calculate averaged or lowest energy partitioning of the peptide chain into helical and coil fragments. The a-helix energy in water was calculated with parameters derived from peptide substitution and protein engineering data and using estimates of nonpolar contact areas between side chains. The energy of nonspecific hydrophobic interactions was estimated considering each a-helix or fragment of coil as freely floating in the spherical micelle or droplet, and using water/cyclohexane (for micelles) or adjustable (for proteins) side-chain transfer energies. The model was verified for 96 and 36 peptides studied by 1H-nmr spectroscopy in aqueous solution and in the presence of micelles, respectively ([set 1] and [set 2]) and for 30 mostly a-helical globular proteins ([set 3]). For peptides, the experimental helix locations were identified from the published medium-range nuclear Overhauser effects detected by 1H-nmr spectroscopy. For sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 93, 100, and 97% of helices were identified with average errors in calculation of helix boundaries of 1.3, 2.0, and 4.1 residues per helix and an average percentage of correctly calculated helix-coil states of 93, 89, and 81%, respectively. Analysis of adjustable parameters of the model (the entropy and enthalpy of the helix-coil transition, the transfer energy of the helix backbone, and parameters of the bound coil), determined by minimization of the average helix boundary deviation for each set of peptides or proteins, demonstrates that, unlike micelles, the interior of the effective protein droplet has solubility characteristics different from that for cyclohexane, does not bind fragments of coil, and lacks interfacial area.
  4.  

  5. Pogozheva I.D., Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. The transmembrane 7-a-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. Biophysical Journal. 72(5):1963-1985, 1997 .
    Abstract.
    A 3D model of the transmembrane 7-a-bundle of rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) was calculated using an iterative distance geometry refinement with an evolving system of hydrogen bonds, formed by intramembrane polar side chains in various proteins of the family and collectively applied as distance constraints. The a-bundle structure thus obtained provides H bonding of nearly all buried polar side chains simultaneously in the 410 GPCRs considered. Forty evolutionarily conserved GPCR residues form a single continuous domain, with an aliphatic "core" surrounded by six clusters of polar and aromatic side chains. The 7-a-bundle of a specific GPCR can be calculated using its own set of H bonds as distance constraints and the common "average" model to restrain positions of the helices. The bovine rhodopsin model thus determined is closely packed, but has a few small polar cavities, presumably filled by water, and has a binding pocket that is complementary to 11-cis (6-s-cis, 12-s-trans, C = N anti)-retinal or to all-trans-retinal, depending on conformations of the Lys296 and Trp265 side chains. A suggested mechanism of rhodopsin photoactivation, triggered by the cis-trans isomerization of retinal, involves rotations of Glu134, Tyr223, Trp265, Lys296, and Tyr306 side chains and rearrangement of their H bonds. The model is in agreement with published electron cryomicroscopy, mutagenesis, chemical modification, cross-linking, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, NMR, and optical spectroscopy data. The rhodopsin model and the published structure of bacteriorhodopsin have very similar retinal-binding pockets.
  6.  

  7. Mosberg H.I., Dua R.K., Pogozheva I.D. and Lomize A.L. Development of a model for the d-opioid receptor pharmacophore. 4. Residue 3 dehydrophenylalanine analogues of Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) confirm required gauche orientation of aromatic side chain. Biopolymers. 39(3):287-296, 1996.
    Abstract .
    We have previously proposed a model for the delta-opioid receptor binding conformation of the high affinity tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) based on experimental and theoretical conformational analysis of this peptide and a correlation of conformational preferences of further conformationally restricted analogues of this tetrapeptide with their receptor binding affinities. A key element of this model is the requirement that the Phe3 side chain exist in the c1=-60 degrees conformation. Conformational calculations on the residue 3 dehydrophenylalanine analogues of JOM-13 suggest that while the dehydro(Z)phenylalanine analogue can be superimposed easily with the proposed binding conformer of JOM-13, the dehydro(E)phenylalanine analogue cannot. These results lead to the prediction that the dehydro(Z)phenylalanine analogue should display similar d-receptor binding affinity as JOM-13 while the dehydro(E)phenylalanine analogue is expected to bind less avidly. Synthesis and subsequent opioid receptor binding analysis of the dehydrophenylalanine analogues of JOM-13 confirms these predictions, lending support to the d-pharmacophore model.
  8.  

  9. Lomize A.L., Pogozheva I.D. and Mosberg H.I. Development of a model for the d-opioid receptor pharmacophore: 3. Comparison of the cyclic tetrapeptide, Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH with other conformationally constrained delta-receptor selective ligands. Biopolymers. 38(2):221-234, 1996.
    Abstract.
    We have previously proposed a model of the d-opioid receptor bound conformation for the cyclic tetrapeptide, Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) based on its conformational analysis and from conformation-affinity relationships observed for its analogues with modified first and third residues. To further verify the model, it is compared here with results of conformational and structure-activity studies for other known conformationally constrained delta-selective ligands: the cyclic pentapeptide agonist, Tyr-c[D-Pen-Gly-Phe-D-Phe]OH (DPDPE): the peptide antagonist, Tyr-Tic-Phe-PheOH (TIPP); the alkaloid agonist, 7-spiroindanyloxymorphone (SIOM); and the related alkaloid antagonist, oxymorphindole (OMI). A candidate d-bound conformer is identified for DPDPE that provides spatial overlap of the functionally important N-terminal NH3+ and C-terminal COO- groups and the aromatic rings of the Tyr and Phe residues in both cyclic peptides. It is shown that all d-selective ligands considered have similar arrangements of their pharmacophoric elements, i.e., the tyramine moiety and a second aromatic ring (i.e., the rings of Phe3, Phe4, and Tic2 residues in JOM-13, DPDPE, and TIPP, respectively; the indole ring system in OMI, and the indanyl ring system in SIOM). The second aromatic rings, while occupying similar regions of space throughout the analogues considered, have different orientations in agonists and antagonists, but identical orientations in peptide and alkaloid ligands with the same agonistic or antagonistic properties. These results agree with the previously proposed binding model for JOM-13, are consistent with the view that d-opioid agonists and antagonists share the same binding site, and support the hypothesis of a similar mode of binding for opioid peptides and alkaloids.
  10.  

  11. Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. Thermodynamic model of a -helix in aqueous solution and micelle-bound state. in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 14th American Peptide Symposium, P. Kaumaya and R.S. Hodges, Eds., Mayflower Scientific, England, pp. 474-476, 1996.
    Abstract.
    The theoretical model of a -helix formation presented here is the first part of a more general approach to calculation of the lowest free energy partition of peptides and proteins into elements of regular secondary structure and coil under different experimental conditions. Estimations of secondary structure stability in the method are based on unfolding free energies measured in peptide substitution and protein engineering experiments and on transfer free energies of model compounds. In the simplest case of linear peptides, considered here, when there is no intra- and intermolecular aggregation of a -helices, the lowest energy partition of peptide into helices and coil can be calculated using the dynamic programming algorithm. However, for flexible peptides, the situation is complicated by averaging of many helix-coil partitions. Recent 1H NMR studies of more than a hundred peptides in aqueous solution and complexes with micelles are used here to verify the model.
  12.  

  13. Pogozheva I.D., Lomize A.L., and Mosberg H. I. Modeling of the d-opioid receptor transmembrane a-bundle, in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 14th American Peptide Symposium, P. Kaumaya and R.S. Hodges, Eds., Mayflower Scientific, England, pp.350-351.1996.
    Abstract.
    The d-opioid receptor belongs to the large family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), transmembrane proteins which transduce external signals to the activation of G-proteins. All members of the rhodopsin-like GPCR family share common spatial structure of the transmembrane 7-a-bundle which represents the most evolutionarily conserved part of these receptors. A new approach for GPCR structure modeling originates from the observation that the content of hydrophilic residues in the GPCR family is unusually high for membrane proteins. It is known that polar groups buried from water in the protein interior have a strong tendency to form hydrogen bonds with each other. The pairs of buried hydrogen-bonded polar residues that appear and disappear in a correlated manner in amino acid sequences can be identified from analysis of multisequence alignments. Hydrogen bonds thus obtained can be used as distance constraints for the packing of the transmembrane a-helices using a distance geometry algorithm.
  14.  

  15. Wang C. and Mosberg H.I. Synthesis of a novel series of topographically constrained amino acids: benzo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acids. Tetrahedron Lett., 36:3623-3626, 1995.
    Abstract.
    The incorporation of conformational constraints into biologically active peptides can provide them with very useful chemical and biological properties, e.g. well defined backbone conformation, specific topographical properties, high potency and selectivity at biological receptors, and increased stability against enzymatic degradation. In the design of bioactive peptides using the concept of topographical constraints, the conformationally restricted phenylalanine analog 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (Tic) has been utilized in many cases. With its bicyclic structure formed via cyclization of the phenolic aromatic ring to the amine nitrogen, Tic provides two potential advantages for replacement of phenylalanine in bioactive peptide ligands: conformational constraints are introduced in peptide backbone by the pipecolic acid bridge and the orientation of the aromatic side chain is restricted. The greatly reduced flexibility of the Tic side chain, in particular, can provide important insights into the bioactive conformation of the peptide ligand and can allow features of the complementary region of the receptor binding site to be inferred. In order to further probe details of the region of the receptor responsible for interacting with the Tic side chain, the benzoTic series was designed by fusing an additional benzo ring to the restricted aromatic system of Tic. Benzo[f]Tic, benzo[g]Tic and benzo[h]Tic corresponding to the three possible extension orientations, were prepared.
  16.  

  17. Mosberg H.I., Omnaas J.R., Lomize A.L., Heyl D.L., Nordan I., Mousigian C., Davis P. and Porreca F. Development of a model for the d-opioid receptor pharmacophore. 2. Conformationally restricted Phe3 replacements in the cyclic delta receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 37(25): 4384-4391, 1994.
    Abstract.
    The in vitro pharmacological properties and conformational features of analogs of the delta opioid receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) in which the Phe3 residue was replaced by each of the four stereoisomers of b-methylphenylalanine (b-MePhe) were investigated. Both analogs in which the a carbon of the Phe3 replacement has L-stereochemistry display high affinity for d receptors with the (2S,3S)-MePhe3 analog exhibiting approximately 8-fold higher affinity than the (2S,3R)-MePhe3 diastereomer. Surprisingly, one analog with D-stereochemistry in residue 3, the (2R,3R)-MePhe3 analog, also displays high affinity for the delta receptor and is extraordinarily selective for this receptor. All analogs were agonists in the mouse vas deferens (MVD) and guinea pig ileum (GPI) smooth muscle bioassays, displaying MVD and GPI potencies consistent with their d and m opioid receptor affinities, respectively. The use of b-MePhe as a replacement for Phe3 was based upon the desire to reduce the conformational flexibility of the Phe3 side chain by imposing a steric rotational constraint in the form of the b-methyl substituent and to thus deduce the residue 3 side chain orientation in the d receptor-bound conformation from the correlation between delta receptor binding affinities and conformational preferences. Molecular mechanics computations revealed, however, that the conformational constraints imposed by the b-methyl group in the (2S,3S)-MePhe3 and (2S,3R)-MePhe3 analogs were too modest to allow unequivocal determination of delta receptor-bound residue 3 side chain conformation. However, analysis of the high-affinity (2R,3R)-MePhe3 analog revealed a strong preference for a single side chain conformer (c1 approximately 60 degrees). Low-energy conformers of this analog could only be effectively superimposed with low-energy conformers of the parent peptide in which the Phe3 side chain conformation was limited to c1 approximately -60 degrees. This observation eliminates the last remaining uncertainty regarding conformational features of the pharmacophore elements in the d receptor-bound state, allowing the proposal of a complete model.
  18.  

  19. Mosberg H.I., Lomize A.L., Wang C., Kroona H., Heyl D.L., Sobczyk-Kojiro K., Ma W., Mousigian C. and Porreca F. Development of a model for the d-opioid receptor pharmacophore. 1. Conformationally restricted Tyr1  replacements in the cyclic delta receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13).  Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 37(25):4371-4383, 1994.
    Abstract.
    A series of analogues of the conformationally restricted delta opioid receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM 13) was prepared in which the conformationally labile Tyr residue was replaced with several less flexible tyrosine analogues. Among these tyrosine analogues were the bicyclic structures 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-7-hydroxyisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (HO-Tic), 2-amino-6-hydroxytetralin-2-carboxylic acid (Hat), and 2-amino-5-hydroxyindan-2-carboxylic acid (Hai) in which rotations about the C a-C b and C b-C g bonds are restricted due to cyclization of the side chain to the backbone. Also examined were analogues in which tyrosine was replaced with either trans-3-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)proline (t-Hpp) or cis-3-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)proline (c-Hpp), residues in which rotations about C alpha-C beta, but not C beta-C gamma, are restricted. Both the t-Hpp1 and c-Hpp1 analogues displayed d receptor binding affinity similar to the parent Tyr1-containing peptide, while the D-Hat1, L-Hat1, and L-Hai1 analogues exhibited somewhat lower affinity. The results observed for the t-Hpp1 and c-Hpp1 analogues are particularly significant since these two residues have little accessible conformational space in common. Since the binding conformation of residue 1 must be included in this limited conformational intersection, its elucidation is facilitated. Bioassay results from guinea pig ileum and mouse vas deferens preparations are in general agreement with the binding results; however some potency discrepancies are observed. These discrepancies may reflect different selectivities among delta receptor subtypes for the analogues or may represent differing efficacies among these conformationally restricted peptides. The conformational properties of the parent tetrapeptide and the residue 1-modified analogues were studied by molecular mechanics computations. All these peptides share a common rigid tripeptide cycle with a single energetically preferred backbone conformation and three different conformers of the D-Cys, D-Pen disulfide bridge, two of which are observed in the solid state and in aqueous solution, as previously determined from X-ray crystallography and 1H NMR spectroscopy data (Lomize, A; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 429-436). All the peptides have similar sets of low-energy conformations of their common flexible elements, the Phe3 side chain and the peptide group between the first residue and the rigid tripeptide cycle. However, possible conformations of the first residue differ and depend on the covalent constraints incorporated into the side chain.
  20.  

  21. Lomize A.L., Flippen-Anderson J.L, George C., and Mosberg H.I. Conformational analysis of the d receptor-selective, cyclic opioid peptide, Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13). Comparison of X-ray crystallographic structures, molecular mechanics simulations and 1H NMR data. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 116:429-436, 1994.
    Abstract.
    The conformational features of the d -selective, cyclic opioid peptide, Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) were investigated using a combination of experimental (X-ray crystallography, 1H NMR spectroscopy) and theoretical (molecular mechanics computations) techniques. Energy calculations with the CHARMm force field show the existence of a single energetically preferred backbone conformation for the cyclic tripeptide portion of the molecule. Several distinct low-energy conformations were calculated, however, for the disulfide bridge linking the D-Cys and D-Pen residues, for the single Tyr residue outside the cycle, and for the Tyr and Phe sidechains. The two calculated lowest-energy conformers of the D-Cys, D-Pen disulfide bridge (A and B) differ in values of D-Cys c 1 and c 3(S-S) torsion angles (the -60° , 90° and 180° , -90° combinations). This is consistent with the observation of two 1H NMR signal sets in aqueous solution (in the ratio 68:32) with distinctly different vicinal coupling constants for protons H-CaCb-H that correspond to a D-Cys c 1 angle ~-60° for the first set and ~ 180° or +60° for the second. X-ray crystallographic analysis of crystals grown from aqueous solution also revealed two independent conformers which are in excellent agreement with the computational and NMR data for the rigid, cyclic part of the molecule including the disulfide bridge. However, 1H NMR data and computational results indicate that the flexible elements of JOM-13 (the exocyclic Tyr residue and the Tyr and Phe sidechains) have no fixed structure in water solution. In the crystalline environment they adopt conformations that are stabilized mainly by intermolecular interactions and which do not correspond exactly to any local energy minimum identified in the molecular mechanics calculations.
  22.  

  23. Mosberg H.I., Omnaas J.R., Sobczyk-Kojiro K., Ho J.C., Ma W., Bush P., Mousigian C., and Lomize A.L. Pharmacophore elements of the TIPP (Tyr-Tic-Phe-Phe) class of d-opioid receptor antagonists, Letters in Peptide Science, 1:69-72, 1994.
    Abstract.

    A series of tri- and tetrapeptides sharing the amino terminal dipeptide unit Tyr-Tic found in the high affinity delta opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-Tic-Phe-Phe (TIPP) was prepared and evaluated in receptor binding assays to explore the role(s) of the Phe residues in position 3 and 4. It was found that aromaticity of residues 3 and 4 is not required for high affinity, a lipophilic side chain in either location being sufficient, as evidenced by the high delta receptor binding affinities observed for the tetrapeptide, Tyr-Tic-Ala-Leu and the tripeptide, Tyr-Tic-Leu. These results support the suggestion of Temussi et al. (Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 198 (1994) 933) that the aromatic sidechain of the Tic residue corresponds to the aromatic sidechain found in residues 3 or 4 in other delta selective peptide series.
  24.  

  25. Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. A conformational modelling of the d-receptor bound conformation that is similar for the cyclic opioid tetrapeptides and d selective alkaloids, in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure and Biology, Proceedings of the 13th American Peptide Symposium, R.S. Hodges and J.A. Smith, Eds., ESCOM. Leiden, pp 905-907.1994.
    Abstract
    Low-energy conformations have been calculated for the delta opioid receptor selective deltorphin analog Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH and for related analogs with conformationally constrained Tyr1 replacements. The cyclic part of the parent tetrapeptide has a rigid mainchain structure, but the side chains of Tyr and Phe are flexible and there are three different conformations of the Cys-Pen disulfide bridge, in agreement with 1H NMR data. A remarkable feature of the lowest-energy conformations for the high affinity delta selective agonists (residue 1 = Tyr, t-3-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)proline, or 2',6'-dimethyl-Tyr, all with Ki ~ 1 nM) is an overlap in space of the Phe3 aromatic ring with the indole ring of the delta-selective alkaloid oxymorphindole (OMI) after superposition of the Na , Ca and Cb atoms of Tyr1 and the corresponding N17, C9 and C10 atoms of the alkaloid tyramine moiety. The overlap is observed only for the g- rotamer (c 1=-60) of the Phe3 side chain. A common low-energy conformation of the Tyr1 residue can be identified as well. It has an identical relative position of the NH3+ group and Tyr ring for all these peptides and the OMI tyramine moiety. The only difference between the candidate receptor-bound conformation for the peptides and the alkaloid is the twist of Tyr1 aromatic ring around Cb -Cg bond (c 2 torsion angle). At the same time, analogs with reduced delta receptor binding affinity (Hai1 and Hat1 replacements with Ki ~ 10-20 nM) have exactly "OMI-like" c 2 angles, but have the Phe3 ring shifted slightly in space relative to the OMI indole ring. The results obtained suggest that the binding modes of these delta selective peptides and alkaloids are very similar.
  26.  

  27. Mosberg H.I., Kroona H.B., Omnaas J.R., Sobczyk-Kojiro K., Bush P., and Mousigian C. Cyclic deltorphin analogues with high d opioid receptor affinity and selectivity. in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure and Biology, Proceedings of the 13th American Peptide Symposium, R.S. Hodges and J.A. Smith, Eds., ESCOM. Leiden, pp 514-516.1994.
    Abstract.
    The heptapeptides deltorphin I and II, Tyr-D-Ala-Phe-Xxx-Val-Val-GlyNH2, where Xxx = Asp or Glu for deltorphin I and II, respectively, are naturally occurring opioids isolated from frog skin which have been shown to exhibit high selectivity for the d type of opioid receptor. This high selectivity is due largely to the anionic side chain of residue 4 which diminishes m but not d receptor affinity, while high d binding affinity is dependent upon an intact C-terminal tripeptide. It has been proposed that this tail plays a conformational role by inducing a b-turn involving residues 3-6. We have previously suggested that a similar conformational element exists in a series of cyclic, d selective tetrapeptide opioids, exemplified by Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen] (JOM-13), which we described prior to the discovery of the deltorphins. In JOM-13, which, like the deltorphins has a Tyr-D-Yyy-Phe N-terminal sequence, the disulfide cyclization has a similar conformational effect as the tripeptide tail in the deltorphins and results in the high d binding affinity displayed by this tetrapeptide. In an effort to better define the role of C-terminal conformation on d selectivity and affinity, we have examined a series of cyclic heptapeptide and related truncated, pentapeptide deltorphin analogs and report these results here.
  28.  

In press or submitted.

  1. Fowler C.B., LeVine H., and Mosberg H.I. Examination of the role of TMH VII in subtype-selective ligand binding using semi-synthetic muscarinic receptors in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 15th American Peptide Symposium, in press 1998.
    Abstract.
    The human muscarinic (hm) receptors, which are members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily, consist of seven transmembrane helices (TMH I-VII) interconnected by intracellular and extracellular loops. Although ligand binding in the superfamily requires the presence of all seven transmembrane helices, it need not require their covalent interconnection. Proteolysis of the b-adrenergic receptor showed that the receptor fragments were able to catalyze agonist-stimulated binding of GTPgS. In another study, biochemically truncated bacteriorhodopsin (TMH III-VII) was reconstituted with two synthetic peptides in liposomes to regenerate function. The purpose of this research was to generate a semi-synthetic muscarinic receptor capable of binding ligand and to explore the role of TMH VII in subtype selective ligand binding by combining a cloned truncated receptor of subtype 1 (hm1 trunc) with a synthetic peptide corresponding to either the TMH VII of hm1 or hm2.
  2.  

  3. Ho J.C., Mousigian C.A., Mosberg H.I. Elucidation of the conformational features within a series of tetrapeptides which determine the selective recognition of m versus d opioid receptors. in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 15th American Peptide Symposium, in press 1998.
    Abstract.
    We have previously described the cyclic m opioid receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2(S-Et-S) (JOM-6). In the present study we report the development of a m receptor pharmacophore model using residue 1 and 3 JOM-6 analogs. The m opioid pharmacophore groups of JOM-6 (i.e., the phenol and Na group of Tyr1 and the phenyl group of Phe3) lie outside of the cyclic portion of the tetrapeptide and are conformationally labile. In contrast to the pharmacophore groups, the tripeptide cycle (a 13-membered ring) experiences only moderate flexibility by virtue of the ethylene dithioether cyclization. To reduce peptide flexibility several residue 1 and 3, and peptide cycle analogs of JOM-6 were prepared. The residue 1 and 3 analogs include: trans-3-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)proline (t-Hpp) and 2-amino-6-hydroxytetralin-2-carboxylic acid (Hat) in the place of Tyr1, and D EPhe in the place of Phe3; whereas the peptide cycle analogs incorporate disulfide (S-S) or ethyne dithioether (S-cis-HC=CH-S) bridges instead of an ethylene dithioether (S-Et-S) bridge. The low energy conformations of each of these analogs were generated using molecular mechanics and then compared to deduce the probable m receptor bound conformation of JOM-6 and its analogs.
  4.  

  5. Gregson K.S., Marletta M.A. and Mosberg H.I. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with calmodulin binding peptides. in Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 15th American Peptide Symposium, in press, 1998.
    Abstract..
    The constitutive isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS and eNOS) are regulated by calmodulin, which adopts an active conformation upon the binding of calcium and binds to target proteins. The inducible isoform of NOS (iNOS) copurifies with calmodulin and was reported not to require calcium for activation. It has been shown that a peptide corresponding to the calmodulin binding region of iNOS (iP), shown below, completely inhibits the inducible isoform at a molar ratio of peptide to enzyme concentration of 12:1. A peptide from the calmodulin binding domain of nNOS (nP), shown below, was synthesized and shown to completely inhibit nNOS at a molar ratio of peptide to enzyme concentrations of 8:1. However, this peptide is unable to inhibit iNOS at molar ratios of peptide to enzyme concentrations up to 16:1. These results suggest that calmodulin interacts with the two isoforms of NOS differently. These peptides are a helical and show 43% identity. There are, however, striking differences in charge and hydrophobicity in nine individual amino acid residues located at corresponding positions in each of the peptides.
  6.  

  7. Pogozheva I.D., Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. The origin of specificity in the opioid receptor family. Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology, Proceedings of the 15th American Peptide Symposium, in press 1998.
    Abstract..
    3D structures of transmembrane domains of human m , d , and k opioid receptors were calculated from the "average" model of rhodopsin-like G-protein coupled receptors, which has been previously developed using an iterative distance geometry refinement with an evolving system of hydrogen bonds, formed by intramembrane polar side-chains in various proteins of the family and collectively applied as distance constraints. Each calculated structure of transmembrane 7a -bundle contains a narrow cavity, whose inner, deeply buried part is nearly identical in m , d , and k receptors and forms the common binding site for tyramine portion of opioid ligands (Asp128, Met132, Phe218, Phe222, Trp274, His278, Cys303 and Tyr308 residues, the numbering of d opioid receptor). However, closer to the surface, the walls of ligand binding "cleft" are formed by conserved (Gln105, Tyr129, Lys214 , Ile277) and various subtype-specific side-chains (for example, Asn/Lys/Val108, Ile/Leu/Ile125, Glu/Asp/Asp210, Asn/Thr/ 211, Ala/Thr/Ala285, Lys/Trp/Glu284, Trp/Leu/Tyr300, in m /d /k receptors). These side-chains interact with "tails" of opioids, which are attached to the tyramine fragment and are directed approximately perpendicular to the bilayer plane. Incorporation of many structurally dissimilar m , d , and k opioids to the models reveals numerous specific interactions within the a -bundle which are responsible for selectivity of ligands.
  8.  

  9. Pogozheva I.D., Lomize A.L. and Mosberg H.I. Opioid receptor 3D structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints.Biophysical Journal submitted 1998.
    Abstract..
    ] Three-dimensional structures of the transmembrane, 7 a -helical domains and extracellular loops of d , m and k opioid receptors, were calculated using the distance geometry algorithm with hydrogen bonding constraints based on the previously developed model of the transmembrane a -bundle for rhodopsin-like G-protein coupled receptors (Biophysical Journal (1997), 70:1963). The calculated opioid receptor structures have extensive networks of hydrogen bonds, small polar sodium-binding cavities, and larger ligand-binding cavities that are partially covered by a b -hairpin formed by the second extracellular loop. The binding cavities consist of an inner "conserved region" composed of 18 residues that are identical in d , m , and k opioid receptors, and a peripheral "variable region", composed of 19 residues that are different in d , m, and k subtypes and are responsible for subtype specificity of various ligands. Sixteen d , m , or k selective, conformationally constrained peptide and nonpeptide opioid agonists and antagonists and affinity labels were fit into the binding pockets of the opioid receptors. All ligands considered have a similar spatial arrangement in the receptors with the tyramine moiety of alkaloids or Tyr1 of opioid peptides interacting with conserved residues in the bottom of the pocket and the tyramine N+ and OH groups forming H-bonds or ionic interactions with a conserved aspartate from helix III and a conserved histidine from helix VI, respectively. The central, conformationally constrained fragments of the opioids, (the disulfide-bridged cycles of the peptides and various ring structures in the nonpeptide ligands) are oriented approximately perpendicular to the tyramine and directed toward the extracellular surface. The results obtained are qualitatively consistent with ligand affinities, cross-linking studies, and mutagenesis data.
  10.  

  11. Lomize A.L, Pogozheva I.D. and Mosberg H.I. Structural organization of G protein-coupled receptors.Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, in press, 1998.
    Abstract..
    Atomic-resolution structures of the transmembrane 7-a-helical domains of 26 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including opsins, cationic amine, melatonin, purine, chemokine, opioid, and glycoprotein hormone receptors and two related proteins, retinochrome and Duffy erythrocyte antigen, were calculated by distance geometry using interhelical hydrogen bonds formed by various proteins from the family and collectively applied as distance constrains, as described previously (Biophys.J., 70 (1997) 1963-1985). The main structural features of the calculated GPCR models are described and illustrated by examples. Some of the features reflect physical interactions that are responsible for structural stability of the transmembrane a-bundle: the formation of extensive networks of interhelical H-bonds and sulfur-aromatic clusters that are spatially organized as "polarity gradients"; close packing of side-chains throughout the transmembrane domain; and the formation of interhelical disulfide bonds in some receptors and a plausible Zn+2 binding center in retinochrome. Other features of the models are related to biological function and evolution of GPCRs: formation of a common "minicore" of 43 evolutionary conserved residues; a multitude of correlated replacements throughout the transmembrane domain; a N+binding site in some receptors, and excellent complementarity of receptor binding pockets to many structurally dissimilar, conformationally constrained ligands, such as retinal, cyclic opioid peptides, and cationic amine ligands. The calculated models are in good agreement with numerous experimental data.

Other publications

  1. Mosberg H.I. and Kroona H.B. Incorporation of a novel conformationally restricted tyrosine analog into a cyclic, d opioid receptor selective tetrapeptide (JOM-13) enhances delta receptor binding affinity and selectivity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 35(23):4498-4500, 1992 .
    Abstract.
    trans-3-(4'-Hydroxy)phenylproline (t-Hpp), a novel, conformationally restricted analog of tyrosine, was prepared as a racemic mixture which was used to synthesize a pair of diastereomeric, cyclic tetrapeptides, t-Hpp-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH, related to the highly d opioid receptor selective compound Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13). One of the pair of diastereomeric tetrapeptides, tentatively identified as that containing the L isomer of t-Hpp, displayed approximately 3-fold improved d affinity and selectivity compared with JOM-13. This result indicates that the conformational limitation imposed upon the phenolic side chain in t-Hpp is consistent with optimal d opioid receptor recognition and provides an example of the usefulness of this novel amino acid for elucidating conformational requirements of tyrosine side chains in other bioactive peptides.
  2.  

  3. Heyl D.L. and Mosberg H.I. Modification of the Phe3 aromatic moiety in d-receptor-selective dermorphin/deltorphin-related tetrapeptides. Effects on opioid receptor binding. International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research.39(5):450-457, 1992.
    Abstract
    The previously described cyclic d-opioid receptor-selective tetrapeptide H-Tyr-[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]-OH (JOM-13) was modified at residue 3 by incorporation of both natural and unnatural amino acids with varying steric, electronic, and lipophilic properties. Effects on m and d-opioid receptor binding affinities were evaluated by testing the compounds for displacement of radiolabeled receptor-selective ligands in a guinea pig brain receptor binding assay. Results obtained with the bulky aromatic 1-Nal3 and 2-Nal3 substitutions suggest that the shape of the receptor subsite with which the side chain of the internal aromatic residue interacts differs for d and m receptors. This subsite of either receptor can accommodate the transverse steric bulk of the 1-Nal3 side chain but only the dreceptor can readily accept the more elongated 2-Nal3 side chain. Several analogs with P-excessive heteroaromatic side chains in residue 3 were examined. In general, these analogs display diminished binding to m and d receptors, consistent with previous findings for analogs with residue 3 substitutions of modified electronic character. Several analogs with alkyl side chains in residue 3 were also examined. While d receptor binding affinity is severely diminished with Val3, Ile3, and Leu3 substitutions, Cha3 substitution is very well tolerated, indicating that, contrary to the widely held belief, an aromatic side chain in this portion of the ligand is not required for d receptor binding. Where possible, comparison of results in this d-selective tetrapeptide series with those reported for analogous modification in the cyclic d-selective pentapeptide [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and linear pentapeptide enkephalins reveals similar trends.
  4.  

  5. Heyl D.L.and Mosberg H.I. Substitution on the Phe3 aromatic ring in cyclic delta opioid receptor-selective dermorphin/deltorphin tetrapeptide analogues: electronic and lipophilic requirements for receptor affinity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 35(9):1535-1541, 1992 .
    Abstract.
    In an effort to explore structural features affecting receptor recognition in a series of conformationally restricted tetrapeptides related to the cyclic, d opioid receptor-selective analogue, [formula: see text] electronic, lipophilic, and steric effects at the Phe3 residue were assessed by substitution at different positions of the side-chain aromatic ring by halogens, alkyl, hydroxyl, and nitro groups. Effects on opioid receptor binding affinity and selectivity were determined. The results, which are generally consistent with reports of analogous modifications in linear and cyclic pentapeptide enkephalins, indicate that steric, lipophilic, and electronic properties are all important determinants of d opioid receptor recognition. Specifically, modifications which increase lipophilicity or exert electron-withdrawing effects on the aromatic ring enhance binding affinity, while hydrophilic, bulky, or electron-releasing modifications are detrimental. These observations are in excellent agreement with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) results reported for Phe4 modifications in linear opioid pentapeptide enkephalin analogues, suggesting that the Phe3 tetrapeptide side chain and the Phe4 pentapeptide side chain interact with the same d receptor binding subsite.
  6.  

  7. Heyl D.L., Omnaas J.R., Sobczyk-Kojiro K., Medzihradsky F., Smith C.B. and Mosberg HI. Opioid receptor affinity and selectivity effects of second residue and carboxy terminal residue variation in a cyclic disulfide-containing opioid tetrapeptide.International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research. 37(3):224-229, 1991.
    Abstract.
    The previously described cyclic, d opioid receptor-selective tetrapeptide H-Tyr-[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]-OH, where Pen, penicillamine, is b-b-dimethylcysteine, was modified at residues 2 and 4 by varying combinations of D- and L-Cys and D- and L-Pen, and effects on m and d opioid receptor binding affinities and on potency in the mouse vas deferens (MVD) smooth muscle assay were evaluated. A comparison was drawn between consequences of alterations in this series of analogs and those of analogous modifications in the related cyclic pentapeptide series which includes the highly d receptor-selective [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin, DPDPE: Unlike effects observed in the cyclic pentapeptide series, the m receptor binding affinities of the cyclic tetrapeptides are not dramatically influenced by substitution of Pen for Cys at residue 2. Conversely, while binding of the pentapeptides is only slightly affected by alteration of the chirality of the carboxy-terminal residue, modification of stereochemistry at the carboxy terminus in the tetrapeptides critically alters binding behavior at both m and d sites. In contrast with the pentapeptide series, the tetrapeptides appear to be highly dependent upon primary sequence for binding and activity, as only the lead compound binds with high affinity to the d site. Results suggest that the less flexible cyclic tetrapeptides, lacking the Gly3 residue, display more stringent structural requirements for binding and activity than do the corresponding cyclic pentapeptides.
  8.  

  9. Mosberg H.I., Heyl D.L., Haaseth R.C., Omnaas J.R., Medzihradsky F. and Smith C.B. Cyclic dermorphin-like tetrapeptides with d-opioid receptor selectivity. 3. Effect of residue 3 modification on in vitro opioid activity. Molecular Pharmacology. 38(6):924-928, 1990.
    Abstract.
    A series of residue 3-modified analogs of the cyclic, d-opioid receptor-selective, dermorphin-like tetrapeptide Tyr-[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen] and the corresponding residue 4-modified analog of the related d receptor-selective cyclic pentapeptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5] enkephalin were synthesized and evaluated in opioid receptor binding assays and in the in vitro mouse vas deferens (MVD) bioassay. In both series, substitutions that would be expected to alter the orientation of the phenylalanine-substituted aromatic side chain relative to the rest of the peptide, due to changes in the conformation of the peptide backbone, had deleterious effects on binding affinity and MVD potency. In general, these adverse effects were more pronounced in the pentapeptide series, owing, most likely, to the greater rigidity and, therefore, reduced susceptibility to conformational perturbation of the tetrapeptides. Substitution of phenylalanine by p-fluorophenylalanine enhances binding affinity in the pentapeptide series, consistent with previous observations in the enkephalins, but is without effect on binding in the tetrapeptide series. Substitution of phenylalanine by homophenylalanine, which alters the relationship of the aromatic phenyl ring to the remainder of the peptide by inserting an additional methylene group between the aromatic moiety and the backbone, greatly reduces binding affinity and MVD potency in the pentapeptide. The corresponding modification in the tetrapeptide series has little effect on d receptor binding affinity and MVD potency and enhances binding to m opioid receptors. Several possible interpretations of these results are discussed.
  10.  

  11. Haaseth R.C., Sobczyk-Kojiro K., Medzihradsky F., Smith C.B. and Mosberg H.I. Single residue modifications of the d opioid receptor selective peptide, [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-enkephalin (DPDPE). Correlation of pharmacological effects with structural and conformational features. International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research. 36(2):139-146, 1990 Aug.
    Abstract.
    Six analogs of the highly d opioid receptor selective, conformationally restricted, cyclic peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin, Tyr-[D-Pen-Gly-Phe-D-Pen]OH (DPDPE), were synthesized and evaluated for opioid activity in rat brain receptor binding and mouse vas deferens (MVD) smooth muscle assays. All analogs were single amino acid modifications of DPDPE and employed amino acid substitutions of known effects in linear enkephalin analogs. The effect on binding affinity and MVD potency of each modification within the DPDPE structural framework was consistent with the previous reports on similarly substituted linear analogs. Conformational features of four of the modified DPDPE analogs were examined by 1H NMR spectroscopy and compared with DPDPE: From these studies it was concluded that the observed pharmacological differences with DPDPE displayed by diallyltyrosine1-DPDPE ([DAT1]DPDPE) and phenylglycine4-DPDPE ([Pgl4]DPDPE) are due to structural and/or conformational differences localized near the substituted amino acid. The observed enhanced mu receptor binding affinity of the carboxamide terminal DPDPE-NH2 appears to be founded solely upon electronic differences, the NMR data suggesting indistinguishable conformations. The observation that the a-aminoisobutyric acid substituted analog [Aib3]DPDPE displays similar in vitro opioid behavior as DPDPE while apparently assuming a significantly different solution conformation suggests that further detailed conformational analysis of this analog will aid the elucidation of the key structural and conformational features required for action at the d opioid receptor.
  12.  

  13. Mosberg H.I., Omnaas J.R., Medzihradsky F. and Smith C.B. I Cyclic, disulfide- and dithioether-containing opioid tetrapeptides: development of a ligand with high d opioid receptor selectivity and affinity. Life Sciences. 43(12):1013-20, 1988.
    Abstract.
    Tetrapeptides of primary sequence Tyr-X-Phe-YNH2, where X is D-Cys or D-Pen (penicillamine) and where Y is D-Pen or L-Pen, were prepared and were cyclized via the side chain sulfurs of residues 2 and 4 to disulfide or dithioether-containing analogs. These peptides are related to previously reported penicillamine-containing pentapeptide enkephalin analogs but lack the central glycine residue of the latter and were designed to assess the effect of decreased ring size on opioid activity. Binding affinities of the tetrapeptides were determined to both mu and delta opioid receptors. Binding affinity and selectivity in the tetrapeptide series were observed to be highly dependent on primary sequence. For example, L-Pen4 analogs displayed low affinity and were nonselective, while the corresponding D-Pen4 diastereomers were of variable affinity and higher selectivity. Among the latter compounds were examples of potent analogs in which selectivity shifted from d selective to m selective as the ring size was increased. The relatively high binding affinity and d receptor selectivity observed with one of the carboxamide terminal disulfide analogs led to the synthesis of the corresponding carboxylic acid terminal, Tyr-D-Cys-Phe-D-PenOH. This analog displayed delta receptor binding selectivity similar to that of the standard d ligand, [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), and was found to have a 3.5-fold higher binding affinity than DPDPE: All the tetrapeptides were further evaluated in the isolated mouse vas deferens (mvd) assay and all displayed opioid agonist activity. In general, tetrapeptide potencies in the mouse vas deferens correlated well with binding affinities but were somewhat lower. Receptor selectivity in the mvd, assessed by examining the effect of opioid antagonists on the tetrapeptide concentration-effect curves, was similar to that determined in the binding studies.
  14.  

  15. Mosberg H.I., Haaseth R.C., Ramalingam K., Mansour A., Akil H. and Woodard R.W. Role of steric interactions in the d-opioid receptor selectivity of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin. International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research. 32(1):1-8, 1988.
    Abstract.
    In order to assess the individual effects of each of the 3-methyl groups in residue 2 of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin on binding affinity to m and d opioid receptors, (2S,3S)methylcysteine ((3S)Me-D-Cys) and (2S,3R)methylcysteine ((3R)Me-D-Cys) were synthesized and incorporated into the analogs, [(3S)Me-D-Cys2, D-Pen5] enkephalin and [(3R)Me-D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin. Of these analogs, [(3S)Me-D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin appears from 1H n.m.r. spectra to assume a conformation similar to those of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin and the less d receptor-selective, but more potent, [D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin. Assessment of binding affinity to m and d receptors revealed that [(3S)Me-D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin exhibits d receptor affinity intermediate between [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin while its mu receptor affinity is similar to that of [D-Cys2, D-Pen5]enkephalin. These results suggest that, for [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin, adverse steric interactions between the D-Pen2 pro-R methyl group and the m receptor binding site lead to the low m receptor binding affinity observed for this analog. By contrast, both the pro-R and pro-S D-Pen2 methyl groups lead to minor steric interactions which contribute to the somewhat lower d receptor affinity of this compound.
  16.  

  17. Mosberg H.I., Omnaas J.R. and Goldstein A. Structural requirements for d opioid receptor binding. Molecular Pharmacology. 31(6):599-602, 1987.
    Abstract.
    Structural features influencing opioid activity of enkephalin analogs were investigated through the synthesis and evaluation of opioid receptor binding affinities of a series of cyclic dithioether-containing analogs and structurally related linear analogs of the cyclic, disulfide-containing peptides, [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Pen2, L-Pen5]enkephalin, where Pen (penicillamine) is b,b -dimethylcysteine. The major effect of increasing the ring size of the cyclic moiety from disulfide to dithioether analogs was a large decrease in d opioid receptor binding affinity which suggests that relatively compact conformations of the peptide ligand are necessary for optimal binding to this receptor. The effect of bulky, hydrophobic residues at position 2 in the peptide chain was evaluated by preparing the linear analogs, [D-t-Leu2, D-t-Leu5]enkephalin (t-Leu, 2-amino-3,3-dimethylbutanoic acid) and [D-Abu2, D-t-Leu5]enkephalin (Abu, 2-aminobutanoic acid). The former analog was found to be 36- and 450-fold less potent at d and m receptor sites, respectively, than was the latter, suggesting that bulky side chain substituents in position 2 of enkephalin analogs lead to a deleterious steric interaction at d and particularly at m receptors.
  18.  

  19. Mosberg H.I. 1H-n.m.r. investigation of conformational features of cyclic, penicillamine-containing enkephalin analogs. International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research. 29(2):282-288, 1987.
    Abstract.
    Conformational features of a series of cyclic, penicillamine-containing enkephalin analogs, all of which display selectivity for the d opioid receptor, were studied by 1H n.m.r. in aqueous solution. Comparison of chemical shifts, coupling constants, and temperature dependence of amide proton chemical shifts suggests different conformational features among the analogs, some of which can be related to the different primary sequences of these peptides. The observation that some of the analogs display disparate individual conformational features while exhibiting similar opioid potency and receptor selectivity suggests that such analogs may share a similar overall topography or at the least maintain the same relative orientations of key portions of the molecule.

This page was last updated 05/01/98 by I. Pogozheva