F e d e r a l D e p o s i t o r y L i b r a r y P r o g r a m ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES Newsletter of the Federal Depository Library Program --------------------------------------------------------------------- December 15, 2000 GP 3.16/3-2:21/16 (Vol. 21, no. 16) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Depository Library Council to the Public Printer Fall 2000 Meeting Recommendations, Commendations, and Action Items RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Cataloging Priorities Council recommends that GPO articulate its cataloging priorities for all publications, both tangible and online. Council further recommends that GPO identify the scope of its cataloging activities for online resources; i.e., what will be cataloged, what will not, and whether records for tangible publications will be updated when electronic versions are discovered. Rationale: Federal depository libraries can make best use of both GPO cataloging records and local staff resources when they are able to dovetail their own workflows and procedures with those used by the GPO Cataloging Branch. Libraries can plan activities such as enhancement of GPO records with URLs for online versions if they know whether or not GPO will add PURLs/URLs to its records retrospectively, or they can catalog online resources that are not a priority for GPO Cataloging. 2. GPO Participation in Governmentwide Initiatives Council recommends that GPO continue to interact with agency and interagency initiatives that focus on access to government information utilizing new and emerging technologies. Rationale: GPO has much to offer new information access initiatives given its experience in providing government information through the FDLP. FirstGov is the latest in a series of government initiatives that would benefit from the consultation and assistance of GPO in such areas as metadata, PURLs/URLs, Web site design for public access, Web search engines, and policies such as permanent public access. 3. PURL Identification Council recommends that GPO enhance the online versions of Administrative Notes Technical Supplement and WEBTech Notes by adding a GPO PURL server search box so that URLs may be searched easily to identify associated PURLs. Council further recommends that the URL for the GPO PURL Server Search page be published in each issue of the paper format Administrative Notes Technical Supplement to aid FDLP library staff in resolving PURL issues. Rationale: Council is aware that many FDLP libraries wish to add PURLs to their catalogs and Web pages when Electronic Library (EL) titles are announced in Administrative Notes Technical Supplement. Recognizing that the time lag between discovery of online titles and PURL assignment would result in an unacceptable delay if inclusion of PURLs were required for announcement of online titles in Administrative Notes Technical Supplement, Council suggests this solution to support timely announcement of accurate information. 4. Policy and the Infrastructure for Permanent Public Access Council recommends that GPO, with assistance from a Council working group and selected members of the depository community, examine policy and infrastructure necessary for the hosting and maintenance at multiple FDLP sites of digital government information for the purpose of providing no-fee permanent public access. Rationale: In light of the dramatic increase in online products, there is a need to identify the policies and infrastructure necessary to accelerate the partnership processes. Council believes that the establishment of a working group, consisting of the Council Electronic Preservation Committee and selected experts from the depository community, would assist GPO in accomplishing the recommendation. The working group should consult with content partners and others involved in digital preservation for their experiences relating to costs and lessons learned. The issues to be examined should include: o Official status and authenticity o Currency (maintenance and updating of serial files) o Integrity and viability of files o Costs involved (to include public services) o File types (source files, PDF, text, HTML, etc.) o Redundancy (mirror sites). 5. Draft SOD Council recommends that GPO proceed with the draft SOD dated October 6, 2000. We further recommend that GPO consider a review of the definitions listed in the policy, a clarification of the concepts therein, and an expansion of the essential titles to be available for selection in paper. Rationale: Council understands that GPO must take serious steps to balance their budget in light of the $2 million budget reduction directed by Congress. However, the policy can be clarified in the following ways: 1) adding and defining the term announcement and reviewing the definitions for dissemination and distribution in relation to the term announcement; 2) adding the term online product to parallel the term tangible product; 3) reviewing the entire document to reflect these new and changed definitions; and 4) editing and amending the content as Council discussed. Council is concerned that the list of essential titles needs broader input from the depository community. Council requests that interested parties submit additional titles for consideration to Laurie Hall