OC schools fall behind in fluency // Immigrant pupils aren't learning enough English

DATE                  02/23/92
NEWSPAPER             THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
SECTION               NEWS
EDITION               MORNING
PAGE                  a01
STORY LENGTH          59 INCHES
HEADLINE              OC schools fall behind in fluency // Immigrant pupils 
                         aren't learning enough English
BYLINE/CREDIT          Dan Froomkin:The Orange County Register
SUBJECT TERMS          OC:LANGUAGE:IMMIGRATION:STUDENTS:SCHOOLS
 
     Orange County's schools are failing to teach immigrant students
  to speak, read and write English fluently, according to state
  records.
     The problem is severe all across California. But it is even more
  pronounced in Orange County, where school districts have been faced
  with a huge wave of immigrant children in recent years.
     Out of almost 1 million limited-English-speaking students
  statewide, only about 50,000 -- or 5.7 percent -- achieved fluency
  during the 1990-91 school year, the state figures show.
     In Orange County, that rate was even lower -- 4.2 percent.
     If immigrant students were becoming completely fluent in English
  within six years -- as most educators say is the case -- then about
  one in six students should be achieving fluency each year, and the
  rate should be closer to 17 percent a year.
     Since 1988, the statewide and countywide rates have both gone
  down, not up. The rate at which Orange County's immigrant students
  are reaching fluency has actually declined by more than half -- from
  10.1 percent to 4.2 percent. Statewide, the rate dropped from 9.4
  percent to 5.7 percent.
   What the figures suggest is that there is a large -- and growing --
  number of immigrant students who are never taught standard English,
  spend at least some of their time not understanding what is going
  on in class and graduate (or drop out) with an education below US
  standards.
     Many educators attack the validity of the state figures. But
  they are the only statistics collected statewide that address how
  well the schools are serving limited-English speakers, who now make
  up one-fourth of Orange County's enrollment and one in five
  statewide.
     Bill Honig, state superintendent of public instruction,
  describes the rate at which students are becoming fluent as "tiny,"
  and said he is concerned about the continuing decline.
     Honig stopped short of calling the figures alarming. "I don't
  think it's fair to say ... that that represents reality."
     But Honig acknowledged that there is no other monitoring system
  that the public can use to see how well schools are teaching
  limited-English students. And he said the rate at which students
  become fluent is "one of the ways (school officials) should be held
  accountable."
     The education establishment is involved in a swirling and
  spirited debate about bilingual education, but the discussion is
  almost always about which strategies are best and what resources
  are most lacking, not about how well the schools are actually doing.
     As a result of a sort of educational Catch-22, the state's
  testing programs don't provide any reliable data on the achievement
  of students whose native language is not English.
     State rules say that only the more advanced limited-English
  students should participate in statewide assessment tests. The rest
  are not tested.
     But at the same time, administrators at school districts with
  many immigrants often blame low scores on the limited-English
  students who do take the tests.
     A major state-funded report on programs for limited-English
  students will be released in the next week, addressing the overall
  scarcity of useful programs, especially at the secondary level.
     And according to Shelly Spiegel-Coleman, an adviser to the
  authors of the report, it also will criticize the state for not
  keeping better track of how much limited-English students achieve.
     The fluency-rate figures reflect how many students originally
  designated as "limited-English proficient" achieve fluency
  comparable to native English speakers, and prove it by passing a
  battery of tests.
     Some Orange County educators note that teaching limited-English
  students is sometimes extremely difficult for reasons beyond the
  lack of language skills.
     Schools generally have a much tougher time teaching impoverished
  students, particularly when the educational levels and involvement
  of their parents is limited.
     "Our immigrant population is not a middle-class population,"
  said Meliton Lopez, Anaheim City School District superintendent.
  "They're the children of the poor."
     Lopez said succesfully teaching the poor is a "barrier that we
  in America have never been able to overcome."
     Many immigrants are transient -- only staying in one school for a
  limited time before moving to other apartments or out of the area
  altogether.
     "You've got kids who are in a district for two or three months,
  then they're in another district for two or three months," said
  Eileen Dibb, who oversees many programs for immigrants at the
  Garden Grove Unified School District. Success, she said, "depends
  on who's in and out and what is really happening with your students
  in real life."
     Several administrators also said that more and more immigrant
  students are arriving in junior high and high schools -- often with
  virtually no formal education in any language. Getting them ready
  for graduation is often impossible, they say.
     "The older students coming in have a greater disadvantage," said
  Rosemarie Bodrogi, an administrator with the Newport-Mesa Unified
  School District. Those students, she said, "are often leaving the
  district before they get to that fluent level."
     Some educators also say the figures are artificially low because
  the process of officially changing students' designation from
  limited-English to fluent is complicated and frequently bypassed by
  administrators who see the requisite paper shuffle as a low
  priority.
     Comparisons between districts are not entirely valid. Among the
  other variables, definitions of fluency vary between districts.
     But the Santa Ana and Garden Grove unified school districts,
  which have by far the highest number of limited-English students in
  the county, also have some of the lowest fluency rates.
     Other districts with high numbers of limited-English students
  and low fluency rates include Fullerton Joint Union High School,
  Newport-Mesa and Tustin Unified.

  SIDEBAR
    Assessing gains  of limited-English students difficult
     An assessment of what is happening to limited-English students
  in Orange County's classrooms is further hindered by the fact that
  virtually every school district in the county has a different
  philosophy. Their approaches vary almost as widely as the
  background of the children they serve.
     Most districts, such as Santa Ana Unified, subscribe to the
  theory that the best teachers for non-English speaking students are
  bilingual teachers. Those teachers can teach other subjects in the
  students' native languages while the students are learning English,
  so they don't fall behind.
     But other districts, including Tustin Unified, believe the best
  strategy is for teachers to speak only in English -- yet have
  special training in teaching non-English speaking children.
     In the absence of hard numbers, educators refer to surveys and
  their own estimates to assess how long it takes immigrant students
  to learn English.
     On average, they say, it takes two to four years for a
  non-English speaking student to learn enough English that they can
  fully absorb instruction in English. At that point, the students
  generally have moved into mainstream classes.
     Then, the educators say, it takes another year or two for the
  students to acquire what is generally considered fluency.
  -- Dan Froomkin/The Register

  CHART:
  How many become fluent?

  The chart shows the redesignation rates for Orange County and the
  state, from 1988 to 1991. The rate is the percentage of "Limited
  English Proficient" students redesignated as "fluent" each year.
                 1991 1990 1989 1988
  Orange County 4.2% 7.5% 9.2% 10.1%
   California   5.7  7.1  8.4   9.4

  How the districts are doing
                         No. Limited-   No. Redesignated %
   District             English           Fluent   Rate
   Anaheim Elementary         6,563           253     3.9
   Anaheim Union High         3,969           285     7.2
   Brea-Olinda Unified          421            39     9.3
   Buena Park Elementary        746           131    17.6
   Capistrano Unified         2,134           129     6.0
   Centralia Elementary         712            54     7.6
   Cypress Elementary           156            28    17.9
   Fountain Valley Elementary   594            62    10.4
   Fullerton Elementary       2,172            85     3.9
   Fullerton Joint Union High 3,440          74     2.2
   Garden Grove Unified       8,673           112     1.3
   Huntington Beach City        340            34    10.0
   Huntington Beach Union High1,521         42     2.8
   Irvine Unified             1,739        177    10.2
   La Habra City Elementary   1,043         53     5.1
   Laguna Beach Unified          72         19    26.4
   Los Alamitos Unified         181         25    13.8
   Magnolia Elementary          933        160    17.1
   Newport-Mesa Unified       2,698         76     2.8
   Ocean View Elementary      1,161         63     5.4
   OC Department of Education    42          0     0.0
   Orange Unified             4,398        211     4.8
   Placentia Unified          2,641        159     6.0
   Saddleback Valley Unified  1,151         43     3.7
   Santa Ana Unified         26,000        805     3.1
   Savanna Elementary           249         31    12.5
   Tustin Unified             1,455         45     3.1
   Westminster Elementary     2,281         74     3.2
   Total Orange County       77,485       3,269     4.2
   Total California         861,531      49,001     5.7

  Source: State Department of Education