Would you have sex with a phsically unattractive memeber of the prefered sex for $100,000? Why or why not?

The answers (in order recieved):

  • yes. I would never have to see the person again and could use the money for just about anything.

  • no, I would feel dirty, sex for cash ain't my style.

  • NO!! .. because umm... I umm.. need MORE money.. plus.. I already know who I want

  • No. I believe that no one is "unattractive" I'm not saying I would or would not do it for the $$, but something's wrong when we judge people just according to their physcal beauty. The only thing that's "ugly" in this world is the libary formery known as "UGLi"

  • Hmm...ya know, I think it might depend on exactly HOW physically unattractive this person is...like, are they Quasimodo or just a little nerdy? But in general...umm, hmm, this is a tough one! While the money sounds really appealing, I think I'd say no. But again, maybe if they were not that unattractive...hard to say.

  • Well, do I have a relationship with somebody else? Do I like the guy? Do I think the sex would be any good? How much do I need the money? In short, it all depends.

  • No, you can't put a price on sex; sex shouldn't be taken that lightly; and besides that, I'd probably get arrested.

  • No, because if I told anyone, I would become known as the "Male Hooker" of school and even if I told no one, I'd have to live with the feeling that I sold my self to someone I didn't love.

  • I might consider it if the person fell into the "ugly but clean" category. Or even the "REALLY ugly but clean" category. My knees are in serious need of an upgrade, and that sort of surgery is not cheap! If I even suspected disease of any sort -- HECK NO!! There's too many nasty bugs floating around out there. Someone offering?

  • Nope, because I've promised to be faithful to someone, and that's too important to me.

  • No, but not becuase of the unattractive part. had sex with people I've considered physically unattractive--usually because of thier personality but not always. I just don't think I'd go for sex for money in any form.

  • I wouldn't have sex with ANYONE I'm not married to for any amount of money, attractive or otherwise. Sorry, it goes against my beliefs completely. However, I will say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so theoretically, it might happen with someone who someone else thought was unattractive, but I didn't. ?

  • No I wouldn't. Sex to me isn't something to be given or taken freely. It has to mean something and taking money for sexual favours makes you no better than a prostitute. Although the movie "Indecent Proposal" made it sound good with Robert Redford, today you have to be careful of all the things you may catch playing such a game of russian roulette.

  • I could get around the real question here by saying "sure, if I was in love with her" but that's not too useful. I don't think i would. maybe if i was $100 K in the hole, i'd consider it, but i think it's a bit too immoral for my tastes.

  • If I was unattached to any other person, yes. The actual sex act wouldn't be all that great, for the prime reason that I would not be emotionally attached to the person and not enjoying myself either, and that would probably be noticed. If I was in a relationship, I would never do such a thing as I would feel far too guilty.

  • Yep, I'm not superficial :P

  • A word to the wise: NEVER HAVE SEX FOR MONEY!!! The best things in life are always free and the cash just ruins the whole effect. Get a grip; then get a job if you're that hard up for cash.

  • i think id have a bigger problem with the random sex factor than with the unattractive part. but then again, i dont consider myself the most physically attractive person, either, so i am sympathetic.

    My answer:

    No. While the money's really tempting, I'm waiting until marriage for sex.
    Answer this week's question.
    Check out other weeks' answers.
    Or all the way to Donald's Homepage.