Why does the United States usually get rather low voter
turn-out? What, if anything, should be done to change this?
The answers (in order recieved):
NEEDED: more convenient places to vote.
I bwelieve that the reason the U.S. gets low voter turn-out is due
to apathy. I myself have not voted in the past two years due to extreme lack
of planning. However, that has changed this year, since I no longer have to
worry about voting absentee. However, I feel that most people are apathetic,
not caring who wins, or, even worse, believing that their votes don't
make that
much of a difference. So the question becomes how can we remedy
people who are
in these two situations? I have no idea what can be done about the
apathetic
types, but for those people who believe that their votes do not make
a
difference, I would have to get them to read the news report a year
or two back
that said a Connecticut election was won by only FOUR VOTES. There
were four
wrote-in votes for Abraham Lincoln, Jon Bon Jovi, yo momma, and the
neighbor's
dog. Think about it: If these four people had taken their votes
seriously,
they could have deadlocked the election! Then again, as Norm
McDonald for
SNL's Weekend Update commented, "Good, that means my vote still
wouldn't have
made a difference." I'd like to hope that most people aren't that
way, but
realistically, I know better. That's a shame, because that's a large
part of
what makes America so great: The fact that we, the common citizens,
have a say
in what views we want promoted.
We need politicians who REALLY fuck up our
country. If we want people to vote, they hafta
be PERSONALLY affected by something that the
politicos in DC could change.
The U.S. primarily gets low voter turnout due
to the fact that the people in general are faced
with poor choices, poor candidates, and for the
most part poor ideas. Until government is removed
from its' present, overextended (and overbearing)
power and prevailing political thinking is changed,
low voter turnout will continue as only those
who currently have vested interest in the process
will truly be affected by a vote. Consider: do you
think many college students REALLY care if Dole or
Clinton get elected? Probably 10-25%.
I really don't know what can be done, I mean,
besides what's done already (like all the
cheesy Rock The Vote stuff and other
voting promotion campaigns...) So, um, I
guess my answer to both ?'s is a rather
lame one: I dunno.
People don't care. Because of opinion polls they think they know is
already going to win so why bother.
kill the media.
You can't make me answer this. THIS IS STILL A FREE COUNTRY, MAN!
Apathy. We think living in a nation with megamillions of people
that our vote won't matter.
Plain and simple.
Either a) none of the candidates are appealing,
or b) people think it just doesn't matter...
either because one vote is such a tiny amount,
or because we'll have the same problems no matter
who's in office. I have no idea what can
change it...
I have no fucking idea!!!
I think they should have more fun people to vote for. I'm only 16 so
voting isn't on my list of things to do, but I know that I wouldn't never be
able to sit through a sermon or whatever its called, by Bob Dole. He's
TOO OLD!
And Bill Clinton's voice just annoys me. That and his nose. Also if
they
rewarded you with like a cookie or something for voting, I'm sure
more people
would show up. Hell I would. Vote for whoever, but hot-damn! Free
cookie!
Because all of the president wanna be's are
schmucks!
I don't know what to do to change it, that's why
I'm not going into politics.
The stats say it all...we're lazy.
Nothing can be done about this. The average American is so dumb,
that he cannot read the instructions, and therefore cannot vote.
my feeling is that it's because there's not all
that much difference between the two parties we
have to chose from. niether is really going to
alter the status quo much; they pay lip service
to different ideals, but the machinations and the
political process make for very little difference
in outcomes. there are a few real differences--
abortion policy, for example--and those who care
about those issues vote.
I suppose I could be considered a direct cause
for the "low voter turn-out" - I have never
voted; I believe the reason I don't is because
it seems to be a big "head game". I can't seem
to sort out the real issues - it is very
frustrating to deal with all the bullshit - so
I have no interest. To change this, I think it
would take a very impressive, down-to-earth
human being (if there are any left) who could
capture and keep my attention. Does it really
matter who you vote for? (and please no lecture
on "one person can make the difference)
Because people are lazy. It takes effort to vote, and it is far
easier for people to talk about
what they believe than actually act on it. And because nobody listens to
them,
because they
don't vote, then they figure nobody will ever listen to them and they
write the
whole thing off.
(This really annoys me.)
What to do about it? Voting by mail might work. Or maybe not. Maybe apathetic
people should just
be shot. They certainly don't seem to care about the terrible destruction
that
a few dedicated voters can do, when the majority stays home.
My answer:
I feel that people don't vote because they don't realize the power of the
vote. But more importantly, they take the right for granted. Were people
no longer allowed to vote they would feel outraged. If they were then
given the right back they would vote, at least for a while. This
however, is not practical. A more practical solution would involve
easier absentee baloting.
I however, do not mind the low turnout. The people that do not vote
tend to be the people ignorant of the issues. I would rather that only
knowledgable people vote - and by not encouraging the general populace
to vote acomplish this.
Answer this week's question.
Check out other weeks' answers.
Or all the way to Donald's Homepage.