This page provides an overview of UCDT program and evaluation activities. A more detailed summary of UCDT evaluation plans may be found here.

 

UCDT Activity Overview

(Last update: 8/8/97)

Project Objectives

PROJECT OBJECTIVES DATA COLLECTION METHODS

INFORMATION

SOURCE

PROGRESS REPORT TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETION
Create a university-wide introductory sequence in global change document analysis course syllabi; university course guides; college and/or school curriculum committee minutes As of 6/97: Global Change I & II are available. Global Change III was pulled from the curriculum approval process. June-98
Create an upper division, capstone course in earth system science document analysis course syllabi; university course guides; college and/or school curriculum committee minutes As of 6/97: The Global Change capstone course is under development. ?
Develop pedagogical tools: (a) create multimedia laboratory modules document analysis; observations laboratory materials; examples of lab assignments and student work. As of 6/97: The labs have been designed to incorporate the programs STELLA and ArcView 3.0 GIS. Aug-97
Develop pedagogical tools: (b) require students to use of the WWW and other Internet Sevices as learning tools surveys; document analysis; observations Internet artifacts (e.g. lab assignments posted to students' homepage); students' reported perceptions and behaviors. As of 6/97: Students have demonstrated that they can utilize the WWW and other Internet services. Aug-97
Develop pedagogical tools: (c) encourage students to utilize the NSF-sponsored U of M Digital Library document analysis; student surveys; content analysis examples of lab assignments and student work. As of 6/97: No progress to report. Item will be discussed at retreat. ?
Develop pedagogical tools: (d) create customized educational CD-ROMS document analysis; student surveys; faculty interviews; observations; content analysis CD documentation; student work; faculty As of 6/97: No progress to report. Item will be discussed at retreat. ?
Develop pedagogical tools: (e) hands-on experimental and computational components for inquiry-based learning document analysis; student surveys; faculty interviews; laboratory observations; content analysis student work; faculty; labs As of 6/97: No progress to report. Item will be discussed at retreat. Dec-97
Identify the climate for interdisciplinary teaching at the U of M faculty and administrator interviews; content analysis faculty and administrator interviews As of 6/97: The evaluation team has conducted one round of interviews with faculty and administrators. We have submitted our analysis to the curriculum development group. Dec-97
Enhanced incentives and support for interdisciplinary teaching through the direct participation of deans from several schools interviews with the deans; meeting minutes deans; meetings As of 6/97: The evaluation team has conducted one round of interviews with deans. We are preparing our report. ?
Development of software tools and lab modules for infusion into the curriculum both on and off campus document analysis of lab assignments developed for STELLA and ArcView 3.0 GIS lab assignments As of 6/97: Members of the curriculum development group have developed labs and shared information at several conferences. ?
Partnership with the 21 colleges and universities participating in the NASA Earth System Science Education Program document analysis; faculty interviews meeting notes; faculty As of 6/97: No progress to report. Item will be discussed at retreat. ?
Partnership with the 9 colleges and universities participating in the Michigan Space Grant Program document analysis; faculty interviews meeting notes; faculty As of 6/97: No progress to report. Item will be discussed at retreat. ?
Partnership with ongoing undergraduate U of M Research Opportunity Program document analysis; student interviews UROP program notes; students As of 6/97: Interviewed UROP student. Dec-97

 

Evaluation Work Plan: Evaluation Questions
Evaluation Questions or Issue Data Collection Method Information Source Target Date for Completion
Core Question A: What impact has the interdisciplinary teaching format had on students? Early Student Feedback; Classroom Assessment Techniques; student surveys (pre- and post-test); observations; focus groups students; faculty; CRLT learning experts; classroom; laboratory Aug-98
Core Question B: How has the electronic learning environment been structured to promote student learning? focus group; student surveys (pre- and post-test); faculty interviews; observational protocol; software document analysis, software evaluation instruments students; faculty; classroom; laboratory Aug-98
Core Question C: What tools and templates have been used and/or developed by UCDT personnel? What UCDT tools and templates are can be used to assist other interdisciplinary groups? document analysis; faculty interviews; observations at faculty meetings tool and template documentation; faculty Aug-98
Core Question D: What is the climate for interdisciplinarity at the U of M as seen through the experiences of UCDT personnel? faculty and administrator interviews; literature review faculty; administrators; literature Aug-98
Core Questions E: What institutional barriers exist that impede the growth of interdisciplinary teaching at U of M? faculty and administrator interviews; literature review faculty; administrators; literature Aug-98

Last content update: 8 August 1997
Last html update: 23 November 1997