|
Walter Christaller: Hierarchical Patterns of
Urbanization By Pragya Agarwal
Back to
Classics |
Background |
The size distribution of urban locations has been a
significant question in urban science. Walter Christaller, a
German geographer, originally proposed the Central Place
Theory (CPT) in 1933 (trans. 1966). Christaller was studying
the urban settlements in Southern Germany and advanced this
theory as a means of understanding how urban settlements
evolve and are spaced out in relation to each other. The
question Christaller posed in his landmark book was 'Are there
rules that determine the size, number and distribution of
towns?' He attempted to answer this question through a theory
of central places that incorporated nodes and links in an
idealistic situation.
The model in CPT is explained using geometric shapes, such
as hexagons and triangles. Similar to other location theories
by Weber and Von Thunen, the locations are assumed to be
located in a Euclidean, isotropic plane with similar
purchasing power in all directions. The assumption of
universality in the transport network was also established and
all parts of the plain were served by the central place. A
Central Place is a settlement or a nodal point that serves the
area around with goods and services (Mayhew, 1997).
Christaller's model also was based on the premise that all
goods and services were purchased by consumers from the
nearest central place, that the demands placed on all central
places in the plain were similar, and that none of the central
places made any excessive profit. |
Innovation |
Christaller's CPT was evolved from the concept of
centralization as an ordering principle. Chirstaller proposed
that if the centralization of mass around a nucleus is an
elementary form of order, then the same centralistic principle
can be equated in urban settlements. The Christaller model
proposed a hierarchical arrangement of settlements and
conceptualized the model with hexagonal arrangements. The
hexagon best equated a circle for maximum coverage and some of
the problems of overlap within circular arrangements were
removed from hexagonal arrangements. The population size and
importance of a settlement were not necessarily synonymous,
but the centrality of the place was conceptualized in terms of
its importance in the region around it.
The theory consisted of the basic concepts of centrality,
threshold, and range. Centrality is the draw to a
particular place. The threshold is the minimum market
that is needed to bring a new firm or service provider or city
into existence and keep it running, and range is the
average minimum distance that people will travel to buy these
services or goods. This is the marketing principle in
Christaller?s model. The variations in Christaller?s central
place theory were based on transportation (mid-point) and
administration (strong centralization and central market). The
marketing principle is better known as the k=3
system, where a hexagonal space is envisaged with the central
places serving two lower-order places each or one-third of the
lower-order neighbors surrounding them. So, including the
central place itself, a total of three places are served. The
goal in the marketing principle was to serve a maximum number
of consumers from a minimum number of centers. The hierarchy
in the marketing model follows the rule of 3s
(1,3,9,27,81,..), where a consumer equidistant from three
higher order places A1, A2 and A3 would purchase 1/3 from A1,
1/3 from A2 and 1/3 from A3. In the transportation
model, the goal was to minimize the network length and
maximize the connectivity of centers being served. To minimize
transportation costs, a different model of k=4 is proposed,
where the hexagon is shifted so that the settlements are
located at the center point of each side, and each central
place serves a half-share of the surrounding hexagon; thus,
the number of places served is four. In the
administrative model, the goal was to provide a
hierarchy of controls where the lower level centers are
completely controlled/administered by the higher order places.
The administrative model is where k=7, and all the six
lower-order places in the hexagon are served by the central
place. Christaller envisaged these models as hierarchical,
with all higher order places in the hexagon surrounded by
other higher-order places to explain not only local but
regional economics and spatialization of urban centers.
Extensions and modifications to Christaller's CPT have been
proposed. The foremost contribution was from August Losch, a
German Economist, who proposed in the 1940s a consumer model
based on administrative and manufacturing structure as opposed
to service centres in Christaller's model. Losch started from
the 'bottom' of the model by considering one 'equivalent
customer' or one unit of consumption and build up from there.
In the Losch model, the ten smallest market areas, each with a
different k-value are plotted with each network surrounding a
central place. These networks were then laid over each other
and positioned to produce the largest number of places for
each k-value. This model produced wedges of city-rich and
city-poor areas spread out around a major central place.
Examples of this for Toledo and Indiannapolis are shown in
Figure 2, below.
Despite the inapplicability of the model in realistic
situations, CPT was a breakthrough in predicting and
understanding the hierarchical development of settlements,
where each level of the hierarchy provides different and
distinctive services. This hierarchical arrangement has been
applied in regional and urban economies, in describing the
location of trade and service activity, and for describing
consumer market- oriented manufacturing. This hierarchical
arrangement also results in a distinctive social network as
the economic activities and movement of people are modified
according to the hierarchical level of services provided. CPT
has acted as a foundation for a large body of work on 'systems
of cities'. The best analogy has been made to the planetary
system, where individual units are kept in place by
gravitational forces between them (Heilbrun, 1987). Simliarly,
the CPT attempts to show that each urban settlement is held in
place within a system of cities and any changes in these are
determined by a place's position within the system (Heilbrun,
1987). |
|
Publications |
Christaller, Walter. Die zentralen Orte in S?schland. Jena:
Gustav Fischer, 1933. (Translated (in part), by Charlisle W.
Baskin, as Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice Hall
1966).
Christaller, Walter, "How I discovered the Theory of
Central Places: A Report about the Origin of Central Places.
in: English, P.W. and R.C. Mayfield, eds., Man Space and
Environment. Oxford Univ. Press, 1972, pp.601-610. |
Related Works |
Berry, Brian J.L. and Chauncy D. Harris, "Walter
Christaller: An Appreciation," Geographical Review LX (1),
1970, pp.116-9.
Heilbrun, James. Urban Economics and Public Policy, 3rd
Edition. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987
Von B?ter, Edwin. "Walter Christaller's Central Places and
Peripheral Areas: The Central Place Theory in Retrospect,"
Journal of Regional Science. Vol.9, 1969, 117-24.
Preston, R.E., "The Dynamic Component of Christaller's
Central Place Theory and the Theme of Change in his Research,"
Canadian Geographer, vol.27, 1983, pp.4-16.
L?, August, "The Nature of Economic Regions," Southern
Economic Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, July 1938, pp.
71-78. |
Links |
Lecture slides of Dr. J. Osleeb, City University
of New York |
|
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2005 by Regents of University of
California, Santa Barbara Webmaster: Gamaiel Zavala, Page
Author: Pragya
Agarwal
| | |