When Neocon is the better option

Thanks again to Jeff. While I've been playing soccer and watching baseball, Jeff has raised the confusion about the new UN Secretary General to a much higher level, chasing the links I couldn't find. Unfortunately, the links don't agree with each other:

Well, I did say 'BELIEVED to be a moonie.' scared the hell out of me, and I'm still not ENTIRELY convinced, as Wayne Madsen usually -- though not always -- knows what he's talking about. But if he isn't, I can't tell you how relieved I am. He's just a friendly neo-con. And as for NK, hell, you call that a
nuke?

You may have already seen this -- if not, it's worth reading. Ki-moon: Moonie or Neocon Toady?

And there's this: Next UN Chief is Member of Pacifist Christian Group

Okay. let's say Ban ki-Moon is NOT a member of the Unification Church. Thank God for that. Now back to the Foley/Haster thing, which is interesting enough.

Check this out: Does D.C. Sex Scandal Go All the Way to the Top?

and this: Sex under the Moon: Was Brock meant to be a Gannon?

To summarize what I've read in those links: Using gay prostitution to blackmail Republicans, Rev. Moon and some other Koreans have been running the United States (and hence the world) for the past 35 years.

And you thought it was something bad.