Bob's Links and Rants

Welcome to my rants page! You can contact me by e-mail: Blog roll. Site feed.

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

WTC collapse official story is "bogus"

That's according to Morgan Reynolds, economist for the Department of Labor during aWol's first term:
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
Like I said earlier today, all 9/11 conspiracy theories are improbable, but the official story is the most improbable of all. Hopefully, if former Bushies from Texas are saying that, and the Moonie Times is reporting it, maybe we're finally getting somewhere. Or maybe Rev. Moon has something even more evil in store for us!

Thanks to Michael for the link.

In the stunning documentary 9/11, one of the firefighters who saw one of the towers collapse said it looked just like a demolition.

Of all the discrepancies about what really happened on 9/11, I'd say that the suspicious nature of the collapse of the WTC buildings is the second most convincing. That the headquarters building of the world's largest-ever military could be attacked without even a pretense of defense over half an hour after it was clear to everyone that some sort of attack was happening is the most convincing. No way in the world would the Pentagon have been left undefended without inside help.