I hate to defend Dr. Dean, but...
This Washington Post editorial is, to use their own word, ludicrous:
The argument that this tyrant was not a danger to the United States is not just unfounded but ludicrous.
Maybe Dean was basing his judgment on that of Colin Powell:
He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. -- Colin Powell, Feb. 24, 2001
If the editorial board at the Post thinks former dictators of disarmed nations hiding in spider holes are a danger to the U.S., they must not be getting much sleep. Which would probably explain the utter stupidity of this editorial.
This Washington Post editorial is, to use their own word, ludicrous:
The argument that this tyrant was not a danger to the United States is not just unfounded but ludicrous.
Maybe Dean was basing his judgment on that of Colin Powell:
He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. -- Colin Powell, Feb. 24, 2001
If the editorial board at the Post thinks former dictators of disarmed nations hiding in spider holes are a danger to the U.S., they must not be getting much sleep. Which would probably explain the utter stupidity of this editorial.
<< Home