John M. Lawler


      I am Associate Professor of Linguistics in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LS&A), and in the Residential College (RC), both of which are at the University of Michigan (UM) in Ann Arbor.

Here are some other Official links:

And here are some unOfficial links, the closest I come to Cheap Thrills for Websurfers (in decreasing order of Cheapness of Thrill :-)


      I am a general practitioner of linguistics, and I have a rather expansive definition of what that includes.   From my Curriculum Vitae:

        Research interests and publications           Education
        Teaching interests and courses taught         Languages        
        Professional activities              Current projects


      I am the chair of the Undergraduate Committee in the UM's Linguistics Program, and I am the principal advisor for those undergraduates who are majoring (concentrating, in UM terminology) in linguistics.   Although linguistics is not a widely-studied undergraduate field in the United States, the UM undergraduate program has been blessed with a relatively large and highly accomplished group of majors, including far more double majors than the LS&A average:
        Undergraduate linguistics majors         Program requirements
        What is linguistics, anyway?             Make an advising appointment


      I've been concerned for a long time about an American linguistic dilemma: on the one hand, Americans are really mystified about language, in my opinion much more so than people in most other countries; there are a lot of reasons for this, but it's a fact.   On the other hand, American linguistics, which ought to be doing something to remedy this situation, has become increasingly irrelevant to everything, including language, over the past few decades; there are a lot of reasons for this, too, but it's equally true and equally depressing.

      Rather than simply accepting this as the unfortunate situation we all have to deal with, in a characteristically Quixotic attempt to do something useful about the problem I've begun posting a series of Frequently Asked Questions about English usage and grammar, written in a non-technical style and intended for anyone concerned about language in general and the English language in particular.   These complement my piece on Frequently Asked Questions on Linguistics, which is part of the UM Linguistics Program Home Page.


      I've also been concerned for a long time -- perhaps even longer -- about another American educational problem: in addition to their general ignorance about language, Americans are much more than usually confused (and, I think, frightened) about mathematics.   Indeed, they boast about it:
    "Math was never my best subject"
    "Oh, I'm no good at math"
    "Never could do that stuff"
etc.   In fact, it is socially acceptable in our culture to be mathematically illiterate; to experience the awesome stupidity of this attitude, merely substitute words referring to some subject Americans are willing to take seriously (sex, for instance) in these disclaimers and imagine how likely they are.   Perhaps if we were left to pick it up on the streets like sex, we might take math more seriously; or perhaps if it were taught as if it were an activity that human beings could indulge in with pleasure, it might do a bit better.

      In any event, in an equally quixotic attempt to do something useful about this problem, I've been teaching a series of what I call "Math Appreciation" courses over the years in the UM's Residential College.   Just as a Music Appreciation course doesn't aim to make a musician of you, but rather tries to help you understand why musicians do what they do, and why they think so highly of it, a Math Appreciation course is not intended to produce more mathematicians and still more failures, but rather to teach what mathematics really is, what it's been (history is rather important, after all), and what it's becoming.   Most of all, it tries to show the fun parts of math, the weird and crazy and startling parts, the truly magnificent parts that burst on you like Beethoven's version of Schiller.   For that purpose, I've found no better organizing source than Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach, and that's the name and the principal text of the course I'm currently teaching.


      A few years ago, when I was chair of the Computer Committee of the Linguistic Society of America, the Commission on the Status of Women in Linguistics was collecting syllabi from academics all over the world who had been offering courses in Language and Gender.

      I helped them get these into ASCII and up on the Linguistics Server, and now that the Web is here, it turned out to be easy to make them more widely available. There are 26, all dating from 1989-93, so some things won't be completely up to date.


      I also do quite a few things with computers.   As a linguist and semanticist, much of my interest centers on the metaphors people use in designing and using computers, and their effects -- and their remedies.

      This summer I taught a brief but instructive Computer Skills class in a Science Camp at the UM. We put up a few Web pages, which you are welcome to look at and use, if you're interested.

      I have developed some software, which may be downloaded and distributed freely, with the usual disclaimers.

      (Two shareware programs that are useful for dealing with downloaded files are:
    StuffitExpander, for Mac files               PK-Zip, for DOS files
All this software is from the Michigan Linguistics Archive, which I maintain.)

  • A World of Words etymology courseware
    (640K Macintosh version - requires Hypercard and Macintalk, works best on System 6)
  • Monosyllable sound-symbolism research database
    (120K DOS Version, including source code in Pascal)
  • Myers-Briggs personality tester
    (52K DOS version, including source code in Pascal)
  • Membership Survey, Linguistic Society of America (LSA): Computer Usage, 1992
    (115K Macintosh version - requires Hypercard)
  • Foggy text generator:  Mac (Hypercard)     DOS version     The Chomskybot (Web version)

  • Last change 1/16/97 John Lawler