Fall, 2005. Lecture (Sec. 001) MW 11–12, 1200
Allan Gibbard, gibbard@umich.edu, phone 764-6892, office Angell Hall 2187.
A current version of this syllabus will be kept posted at
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gibbard/sy361f05.htm
Requirements: The course requires three fairly short
papers, a
midterm exam, and a final exam, along with possible brief exercises,
attendance
at lectures and discussion sections, and participation in
discussion. The
papers are due October 12, November 9, and December 7. The
midterm exam
is on October 26 in class, and the final exam is Tuesday December 20,
4–6
p.m. (Make sure you will be able to be at the final exam.)
Preparation for the course: It is assumed that you have
some
familiarity with philosophy in the "analytic" tradition, but you
needn't have taken a course in ethics before. Any philosophy
introduction
taught by the Department of Philosophy at the
Participation: We meet together for two lectures per week, and in smaller sections for recitation/discussion. The course is designed for active participation, and so regular attendance is required for both lecture and section. Please let us know your thoughts, what's puzzling you, where you're lost and where things are getting too glaringly obvious. In the lectures, questions, discussion, and debate are welcome (although we might at times have to cut it off and leave it for sections). At the end of a lecture, I may ask for brief questions and philosophical thoughts on a sheet of paper.
Time demands: It is assumed that for each two hours of lecture and discussion, you will spend about four hours outside class in careful reading, thinking, note-taking, short assignments, and paper writing, making about eight hours of work outside of class each week. (The course thus constitutes about one-quarter of a serious full-time course load.) Besides the major assignments of 5-page papers and exams, there will probably be brief, half-page exercises due at many section meetings. These will be required, and not turning them in in satisfactory form would affect your course grade, but these short exercises will not be formally graded.
[Note: A few things should go without saying, but with
apologies for what I hope must be an insult to your intelligence, I
spell them
out: (1) The work must be your own, and academic dishonesty would
result in
failing the course, along with the usual other possible penalties.
(2)
All requirements of the course must be met if you are to receive a
passing
grade for the course. (3) Regular attendance of class sessions is
required.]
POJMAN, Louis P. (ed.)
Ethical Theory: Classic and Contemporary Readings (fourth
edition, 2002)
· 1.1 Plato (8–14), 2.1 Herodotus (20), 2.2 Aquinas (20–33)
· 2.3 Benedict (33–38), 2.4 Pojman (38–51), 2.5 Harman (52–61)
· 3.1 Hobbes (66–78), 3.2 Feinberg (79–90)
· 3.3 Medlin
(90–95), 3.4
Kalin (95–108)
· 4.1 Bentham
(115–117),
4.2 Nozick (118–119), 4.3
· 4.5 Parfit
(134–140),
4.6 Nagel (141–150)
· 5.1 Mill (155–176)
· 5.2 Smart (177–183), 5.3 Nielsen (183–191), 5.4 Williams (192–201)
· 5.5 Hospers (201–210), 5.6 Nozick (211–214), 5.7 Foot (215–224)
· First short
paper due
Fall break Mon. Oct. 17
· 5.8 Scheffler
(224–233), 5.9 Jeske & Fumerton (233–240), 5.10
Singer
(241–248)
· 6.1 Kant (255–275)
· Midterm Exam
· 6.2 Ross (275–283), 6.3 O'Niell (284–294), 6.4 Nagel (294–302)
· 6.5 Foot
(302–309),
6.6 Thomson (309–318), 6.7 Quinn (318–328)
· 7.1 Aristotle (333–346), 7.2 Mayo (347–349), 7.3 Frankena (350–355)
· 8.1 Hume (405–412), 8.2 Moore (412–418), 8.3 Ayer (419–424)
· 8.4 Hare
(425–432),
8.5 Warnock (433–440)
· 9.1 Mackie
(446–456),
9.2
· 9.3 Harman (465–474), 9.4 Sturgeon (474–485)
· 10.1 Plato (540–546), 5.3 Gauthier (546–558), 5.4 Kavka (559–571)
· Part XI:
11.1 Plato
(600–601), 11.2 Kant (602–606), 11.3 Russell
(606–610), 11.4
Mavrodes (611–618), 11.5 Nielsen (619–624)
· Part XII.A:
A.1 Darwin
(630–643), A.2
· Third short
paper due in
section.
· 9.6 Williams (501–512), 9.8 Smith (525–535)